Stop Calling It Marriage Equality

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by martybegan, Oct 8, 2014.

  1. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    41,899
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +21,502
    Interesting article in the Federalist:

    Stop Calling It Marriage Equality

    Some quotes:

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  2. R.D.
    Offline

    R.D. Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 7, 2011
    Messages:
    8,445
    Thanks Received:
    2,373
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +3,375
    All you’ve done is redefine the parameters of marriage. You support gay marriage, not “marriage equality.”


    In a nutshell
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  3. Iceweasel
    Offline

    Iceweasel Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2013
    Messages:
    43,358
    Thanks Received:
    6,400
    Trophy Points:
    1,870
    Location:
    Washington State
    Ratings:
    +33,211
    It's not a slippery slope. What's the argument against it? It has a history as long as mankind and rejecting traditional marriage while claiming we need to adhere to the late tradition of two people is odd and illogical.
     
  4. Luddly Neddite
    Offline

    Luddly Neddite BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    63,484
    Thanks Received:
    9,730
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +28,019
    A look at history and the whole "traditional marriage" argument falls apart.

    Not to mention that government has no place in our private lives.

    MYOB

    [​IMG]
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 6
  5. Luddly Neddite
    Offline

    Luddly Neddite BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2011
    Messages:
    63,484
    Thanks Received:
    9,730
    Trophy Points:
    2,040
    Ratings:
    +28,019
    Some RWs are against nanny state type laws right up until they're for it.
     
  6. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    41,899
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +21,502
    Defining the marriage contract is not a "nanny state type law."

    Fining a baker for not baking a cake? THAT'S a nanny state type law.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    89,157
    Thanks Received:
    13,548
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +41,060
    If three people are married and one dies, are the remaining two still married? And if not, who gets custody of the kids?
     
  8. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    165,416
    Thanks Received:
    14,852
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +50,391
    Polygamy is indeed a slippery slope fallacy.
     
  9. martybegan
    Offline

    martybegan Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Apr 5, 2010
    Messages:
    41,899
    Thanks Received:
    5,806
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Ratings:
    +21,502
    But the reasons used to advocate for legal gay marriage can be used unchanged to advocate for legal plural marriage. That isn't a slippery slope.
     
  10. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    165,416
    Thanks Received:
    14,852
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +50,391
    Dead wrong. You can have your own opinions but not your own definitions.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

stop gay marriage in the us