Stand With Brett Kavanaugh

No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.
 
Indeed. When the Chief Accuser provides no corroborating evidence and insists that she testify AFTER the accused, it smells like a political hit job.
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.


That is why the left and the Demo-frauds want to hold off the nomination until after the election. But in reality; they are just trying to derail it. So why throw in a scandal in, to make it "appear" factual. When in reality, it was all some elaborate scheme to dump Kavanaugh instead. And rail Trump second term in the process.
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.

Rumor has it he raped 44 women. And the Dems actually stalled the nomination to stop the embarrassment.

See how baseless allegations work?
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.

Rumor has it he raped 44 women. And the Dems actually stalled the nomination to stop the embarrassment.

See how baseless allegations work?
I heard it was 44 sheep. I guess that could also mean Democrat voter? But then how do you know they were all female?
 


Juanita Broaddrick (alleged survivor of Bill Clinton rape) slams Brett Kavanaugh accusers. Juanita Broaddrick is one of many women who have accused Bill Clinton of rape (and didn't wait ~30 years to come forward with the accusation). She explains what happened on April 25, 1978, when Bill Clinton allegedly raped her. She then explains why the Kavanaugh accusers are not credible and have not produced a single shred of evidence.
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.
well actually the presidential election isn't until 2020 right? how is that rushing exactly? isn't that like 26 months? you and yours still don't understand the word precedence do you? lmao. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
The larger issue with Kavanaugh is that he refusing to admit that the incident ever happened - despite some pretty convincing evidence that it did.

That means he's lying under oath - committing perjury. He should not only be denied the SCOTUS seat, but should be removed from the bench entirely and disbarred.

If he would have man'd up, admitted what he had done and apologized to Dr. Ford, it would have been somewhat reasonable for the Senate to put him on SCOTUS - and write off his actions from 36 years ago as a youthful mistake.

But perjury under oath in these confirmation hearings is UNFORGIVABLE!
 
The larger issue with Kavanaugh is that he refusing to admit that the incident ever happened - despite some pretty convincing evidence that it did.

That means he's lying under oath - committing perjury. He should not only be denied the SCOTUS seat, but should be removed from the bench entirely and disbarred.

If he would have man'd up, admitted what he had done and apologized to Dr. Ford, it would have been somewhat reasonable for the Senate to put him on SCOTUS - and write off his actions from 36 years ago as a youthful mistake.

But perjury under oath in these confirmation hearings is UNFORGIVABLE!
what incident? where was the incident he's supposed to remember exactly and who was there and when was it?

see the accused doesn't give the accuser information to use against himself. what alternative world do you live in. Fringe?

how about have the accuser state when where and who for us all? you really do believe people are stupid :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:only leftists who make posts like yours I guess.
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.


and, the jack ass GOP is STILL withholding over 40K pages of docs on the rapist judge
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.
Look at you howling at the moon because the GOP followed the rules both times.

Well no, they changed the long standing rule on the confirmation process for SC Judges. They had to really, after they refused to have any hearings or even meet with Garland. It is a move that will haunt them in the future.
 
No hearing for Garland because ? nomination 237 days before an election.
Now rushing to confirm Kavanaugh 49 days before an election?
And you dare to call that fair.


and, the jack ass GOP is STILL withholding over 40K pages of docs on the rapist judge

"rapist judge"?

Do you have any evidence to back that claim? Or are you just asserting to the #MeToo movement, too?
 
Stand With Brett Kavanaugh
And not with the lying POS
The fact that our weak leadership in The Senate is entertaining these wild assed last minute accusations is infuriating to me.

If even one last second accuser has even a shred of evidence, even a hint of credibility, of course they should be heard. Personally I think all the attorneys representing these people should have their law license stripped, and the false accusers sued, and prosecuted.

It's time to stop treating these people with kid gloves and just bring down the hammer on this type of subversive activities.
 

Forum List

Back
Top