Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You don't think.
MSNBC is no more credible than FNC. That is not my opinion. It is the view of researchers from non-partisan institutions. That research reaches very different conclusions to your opinions. Whether it suits you or not, it is what it is.
Provide us a list of those institutions.
She won't do it, because she doesn't have anything to back up her statement.
However...........there IS a study from a non partisan institution about Fox news viewers.....
If Fox News viewers want to be informed about current events, they might as well turn off the TV.
A poll released by Fairleigh Dickinson University on Monday found that people who get their news from Fox News know significantly less about news both in the U.S. and the world than people who watch no news at all.
In a survey of 612 New Jersey natives, Fox News fans flunked questions about Egypt and Syria when compared with people who don't watch the news. Fox viewers were 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians toppled their government and 6 points less likely to be aware that Syrians have not yet overthrown theirs.
Fox News viewers less informed than those who don?t watch news at all: study - New York Daily News
No, I'm saying liberal talk radio was and is a dismal failure.Liberals dominate the commercial media?
If so, wouldn't that be because they're better at it?
Maybe if conservatives took the trouble to develop some business acumen, they might be able to dominate the commercial media.
I gotta admit, the Air America business plan was sheer genius.
1. Screech incoherently 24/7 about BOOOOOSH!!
2. ?????
3. Profit!!!
Are you saying that liberals don't dominate the media? I guess all your rightwing pals are full of shit then.
That's what we've been trying to tell them.
You don't think.
MSNBC is no more credible than FNC. That is not my opinion. It is the view of researchers from non-partisan institutions. That research reaches very different conclusions to your opinions. Whether it suits you or not, it is what it is.
Provide us a list of those institutions.
She won't do it, because she doesn't have anything to back up her statement.
However...........there IS a study from a non partisan institution about Fox news viewers.....
If Fox News viewers want to be informed about current events, they might as well turn off the TV.
A poll released by Fairleigh Dickinson University on Monday found that people who get their news from Fox News know significantly less about news both in the U.S. and the world than people who watch no news at all.
In a survey of 612 New Jersey natives, Fox News fans flunked questions about Egypt and Syria when compared with people who don't watch the news. Fox viewers were 18-points less likely to know that Egyptians toppled their government and 6 points less likely to be aware that Syrians have not yet overthrown theirs.
Fox News viewers less informed than those who don?t watch news at all: study - New York Daily News
Poor Dinnerjacket. So misunderstood.You would think for for Ivy League students they would have a little more understanding and intelligence.
Liberals dominate the commercial media?
If so, wouldn't that be because they're better at it?
Maybe if conservatives took the trouble to develop some business acumen, they might be able to dominate the commercial media.
I gotta admit, the Air America business plan was sheer genius.
1. Screech incoherently 24/7 about BOOOOOSH!!
2. ?????
3. Profit!!!
I'm watching Meet the Press with David Gregory.
I'm amazed watching him grill Harry Reid. Attacking, Attacking, Attacking.
But then when Lindsey Grahame and other Republicans are on, no interruptions, all softball questions and he lets them go on endlessly with their message.
MSNBC can have "opinion anchors" like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz, but when it comes to the "serious" interviews, like with David Gregory, it's all "conservative" and "fluff". Unless you're a Democrat.
And the right is always screaming about "liberal bias". I just don't see it.
I'm watching Meet the Press with David Gregory.
I'm amazed watching him grill Harry Reid. Attacking, Attacking, Attacking.
But then when Lindsey Grahame and other Republicans are on, no interruptions, all softball questions and he lets them go on endlessly with their message.
MSNBC can have "opinion anchors" like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz, but when it comes to the "serious" interviews, like with David Gregory, it's all "conservative" and "fluff". Unless you're a Democrat.
And the right is always screaming about "liberal bias". I just don't see it.
Then check the research done by UCLA and Harvard.
They both made it clear that FOX is just to the right, while CNN is off to the left and MSNBC is far left whacks.
don't like the research results? Take it up with the academics.
I'm watching Meet the Press with David Gregory.
I'm amazed watching him grill Harry Reid. Attacking, Attacking, Attacking.
But then when Lindsey Grahame and other Republicans are on, no interruptions, all softball questions and he lets them go on endlessly with their message.
MSNBC can have "opinion anchors" like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz, but when it comes to the "serious" interviews, like with David Gregory, it's all "conservative" and "fluff". Unless you're a Democrat.
And the right is always screaming about "liberal bias". I just don't see it.
Then check the research done by UCLA and Harvard.
They both made it clear that FOX is just to the right, while CNN is off to the left and MSNBC is far left whacks.
don't like the research results? Take it up with the academics.
I find it fascinating that the left never site that research. Perhaps because it was based considerably more than 612 New Jersey natives? Or because it covers decades of regular, academically solid, outcomes? Or maybe they're just too fucking dumb to look further than the media to be spoon fed the 'results'? Or... maybe the truth just doesn't suit their partisan agenda?
Personally, based on my observational research, I believe it may be that they are just plain stupid.
Makes you wonder why do many on the left support the man.Poor Dinnerjacket. So misunderstood.You would think for for Ivy League students they would have a little more understanding and intelligence.
I doubt many (if any) people in the audience spoke Persian. What I understood him to say is there is not an openly gay society in ultra conservative Iran as there is America.
Then check the research done by UCLA and Harvard.
They both made it clear that FOX is just to the right, while CNN is off to the left and MSNBC is far left whacks.
don't like the research results? Take it up with the academics.
I find it fascinating that the left never site that research. Perhaps because it was based considerably more than 612 New Jersey natives? Or because it covers decades of regular, academically solid, outcomes? Or maybe they're just too fucking dumb to look further than the media to be spoon fed the 'results'? Or... maybe the truth just doesn't suit their partisan agenda?
Personally, based on my observational research, I believe it may be that they are just plain stupid.
Funny thing is the research looks like Harvard copied UCLA. The numbers are almost exactly the same.
I see you're totally ignorant about how the radio business works.Liberals dominate the commercial media?
If so, wouldn't that be because they're better at it?
Maybe if conservatives took the trouble to develop some business acumen, they might be able to dominate the commercial media.
I gotta admit, the Air America business plan was sheer genius.
1. Screech incoherently 24/7 about BOOOOOSH!!
2. ?????
3. Profit!!!
Exactly it's more profitable to preach Corporations should own Americam and working people shoulkd be thankful to them and bend over for them. Corpoatation love to hear that BS.
Liberals dominate the commercial media?
If so, wouldn't that be because they're better at it?
Maybe if conservatives took the trouble to develop some business acumen, they might be able to dominate the commercial media.
I'm watching Meet the Press with David Gregory.
I'm amazed watching him grill Harry Reid. Attacking, Attacking, Attacking.
But then when Lindsey Grahame and other Republicans are on, no interruptions, all softball questions and he lets them go on endlessly with their message.
MSNBC can have "opinion anchors" like Rachel Maddow and Ed Schultz, but when it comes to the "serious" interviews, like with David Gregory, it's all "conservative" and "fluff". Unless you're a Democrat.
And the right is always screaming about "liberal bias". I just don't see it.
Then check the research done by UCLA and Harvard.
They both made it clear that FOX is just to the right, while CNN is off to the left and MSNBC is far left whacks.
don't like the research results? Take it up with the academics.
I find it fascinating that the left never site that research. Perhaps because it was based considerably more than 612 New Jersey natives? Or because it covers decades of regular, academically solid, outcomes? Or maybe they're just too fucking dumb to look further than the media to be spoon fed the 'results'? Or... maybe the truth just doesn't suit their partisan agenda?
Personally, based on my observational research, I believe it may be that they are just plain stupid.
Liberals dont think for themselves?
how can you keep up with that idiot line Cali?