So In The Absence of Deity: Financial Inclusion(?)!

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril.: About the number of deities alleged in all of history--not that pre-humans of any type knew anything about that. The Hebrew calendar only goes back 6000 to 7000 years. Everyone else clocks in about 4.0 bil. years. Humans had come out of the primordial rain forest only about 5000 years ago: Even creating farming, and all by themselves.

Humans could eat, get fat, large, and dominating of one another. An exiled Egyptian Prince would be able to actually help write down a lot stories about what happened next. One thing happening was counting. Primitives of the last century, finally discovered, understood one, two, and many. Conquering and subjugating Egypt was far more advanced than that. It could not only count, but create, and construct. It could count its own peoples, and other peoples: And learn to kill them, enslave them, and create additional time-off for other inventions.

One thing new was usury. Just numbers themselves could be manipulated. One thing plus one thing could be two things. One woman could multiply even more things. Two women could multiply even more things. And so numbers were able to be multiplied. And then counting could be assigned, even to things that mattered. Mail toiler had five plow sticks, and could trade one for other stuff. By the By, numbers could be assigned so that some had way more, and could exchange them for even labor, materials, food, clothing, animals, and anything else.

Then others had less. One number applied to all the others could create very rich people, and people with less to exchange. The market place arose, able to support the more greatly numbered. They could use the numbers to subjugate the lesser numbers: Early labor.

So Moses came up with Deut. 23:19-20. Primitive Israel would not do usury arithmetic like that amongst one another. Everyone else they could set to subjugation with joyful abandon. The one peoples could be a nation just doing math to everyone else. At least one king could see himself blessed with so many numbers as to be able to take on many of the women multipliers, and make them--whatever happened in history.

Other nations were also able to subjugate their own peoples--laboring slaves and educated democracy participants, most famously arose. So one or more carpenters could notice that numbers on one side of a board rectangle could apply to a diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little lines could be drawn from the left side to the diagonal: And just like usury. Then a line could be drawn down the middle, parallel to the left side. Up at the top, there were more little lines in some of the space. At the bottom there were no lines at all in the space. So if people at those levels on the board went to a market--they were worthless. The marketplace needed that gap filled.

So Alexander the Great would start to spread concepts like that around--not entirely consciously or deliberately.

New Testament Matthew 25: 14-30 would show the usury outcome--the Foreclosure Crisis of of 2008, 2009. New Testament Matthew 20:1-16 would remedy the problem of the missing lines at the lower levels. Everyone could go to market with something, plus some newly earned--and regardless if they had worked all the (year) or not: Like the Obama refundable, equal-amount refundable: Make Work Pay Income Tax Credit.

That's a fast-forward. "Good Without A God" was not applied.

And certainly not by New Testament, subject the Gospels. Certainly not Mohammed, who would only condemn wealth from usury. Certainly not Adam Smith, appreciative of accumulation and sloth. Certain not Karl Marx, who would backtrack to "Kill everyone in sight:" No new numbering method applied. Keynes would pick up on the numbers, but not the remedy method, only the usury method. John Kenneth Galbraith would also leave that out of any explanations. Milton Friedman, and any remaining followers, would offer no such remedy.

US President Nixon had created a reliance on usury-based wage and price guidelines. Senator George McGovern had proposed and equal amount, national remedy--at last. President Ford would launch equal amount tax rebates. Congress would create the per child equal amount tax credit, advertised directly as a remedy for the heinous and usury based: Regressive payroll tax. Later on, in 1986: Then Congress would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. By the time of the Bush Presidency, after the first one: So many people were off the tax rolls that tax cuts offered no stimulus at all to the economy.

And famously now: There are giant federal deficits, and fears of a global recession.

There is no deity about it.

A description would appear in the Free Venice Beach, mid-1980's, an underground paper, famous author, Ken Kesey had been a founder.

Only last year, Nigeria could create "Traders Moni," as first-time-ever-in history equal amounts of credit for 2.0 mil. micro-businesses. When the credit is repaid, then a new limit is created, equally, at a higher amount. It can be called credit, but not wealth from Riba: Nigeria being Commonwealth, but also nearly half Moslem.

So Look Ma! No Deity!

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes soar like Great Crow of Liberation(?)!)
 
US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril.: About the number of deities alleged in all of history--not that pre-humans of any type knew anything about that. The Hebrew calendar only goes back 6000 to 7000 years. Everyone else clocks in about 4.0 bil. years. Humans had come out of the primordial rain forest only about 5000 years ago: Even creating farming, and all by themselves.

Humans could eat, get fat, large, and dominating of one another. An exiled Egyptian Prince would be able to actually help write down a lot stories about what happened next. One thing happening was counting. Primitives of the last century, finally discovered, understood one, two, and many. Conquering and subjugating Egypt was far more advanced than that. It could not only count, but create, and construct. It could count its own peoples, and other peoples: And learn to kill them, enslave them, and create additional time-off for other inventions.

One thing new was usury. Just numbers themselves could be manipulated. One thing plus one thing could be two things. One woman could multiply even more things. Two women could multiply even more things. And so numbers were able to be multiplied. And then counting could be assigned, even to things that mattered. Mail toiler had five plow sticks, and could trade one for other stuff. By the By, numbers could be assigned so that some had way more, and could exchange them for even labor, materials, food, clothing, animals, and anything else.

Then others had less. One number applied to all the others could create very rich people, and people with less to exchange. The market place arose, able to support the more greatly numbered. They could use the numbers to subjugate the lesser numbers: Early labor.

So Moses came up with Deut. 23:19-20. Primitive Israel would not do usury arithmetic like that amongst one another. Everyone else they could set to subjugation with joyful abandon. The one peoples could be a nation just doing math to everyone else. At least one king could see himself blessed with so many numbers as to be able to take on many of the women multipliers, and make them--whatever happened in history.

Other nations were also able to subjugate their own peoples--laboring slaves and educated democracy participants, most famously arose. So one or more carpenters could notice that numbers on one side of a board rectangle could apply to a diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little lines could be drawn from the left side to the diagonal: And just like usury. Then a line could be drawn down the middle, parallel to the left side. Up at the top, there were more little lines in some of the space. At the bottom there were no lines at all in the space. So if people at those levels on the board went to a market--they were worthless. The marketplace needed that gap filled.

So Alexander the Great would start to spread concepts like that around--not entirely consciously or deliberately.

New Testament Matthew 25: 14-30 would show the usury outcome--the Foreclosure Crisis of of 2008, 2009. New Testament Matthew 20:1-16 would remedy the problem of the missing lines at the lower levels. Everyone could go to market with something, plus some newly earned--and regardless if they had worked all the (year) or not: Like the Obama refundable, equal-amount refundable: Make Work Pay Income Tax Credit.

That's a fast-forward. "Good Without A God" was not applied.

And certainly not by New Testament, subject the Gospels. Certainly not Mohammed, who would only condemn wealth from usury. Certainly not Adam Smith, appreciative of accumulation and sloth. Certain not Karl Marx, who would backtrack to "Kill everyone in sight:" No new numbering method applied. Keynes would pick up on the numbers, but not the remedy method, only the usury method. John Kenneth Galbraith would also leave that out of any explanations. Milton Friedman, and any remaining followers, would offer no such remedy.

US President Nixon had created a reliance on usury-based wage and price guidelines. Senator George McGovern had proposed and equal amount, national remedy--at last. President Ford would launch equal amount tax rebates. Congress would create the per child equal amount tax credit, advertised directly as a remedy for the heinous and usury based: Regressive payroll tax. Later on, in 1986: Then Congress would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. By the time of the Bush Presidency, after the first one: So many people were off the tax rolls that tax cuts offered no stimulus at all to the economy.

And famously now: There are giant federal deficits, and fears of a global recession.

There is no deity about it.

A description would appear in the Free Venice Beach, mid-1980's, an underground paper, famous author, Ken Kesey had been a founder.

Only last year, Nigeria could create "Traders Moni," as first-time-ever-in history equal amounts of credit for 2.0 mil. micro-businesses. When the credit is repaid, then a new limit is created, equally, at a higher amount. It can be called credit, but not wealth from Riba: Nigeria being Commonwealth, but also nearly half Moslem.

So Look Ma! No Deity!

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes soar like Great Crow of Liberation(?)!)

US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril.:

What is "net debt"?
How is it different than "debt"?
 
Accounting and accountants is the answer. A giant Corporation has a lot of debt. There is so much that subsidiaries report how much of it they account for. No one adds the subsidiary total to the original Total.

Except for Federal Reserve USA: Which measures "Flow of Funds," a different kind of accounting.

And in that too: There is really no deity about it!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Problem is that the flies seem attracted to the crow, maybe? USA! USA! USA! NRA! NRA! (SPCA! SPCA!)!)
 
Accounting and accountants is the answer. A giant Corporation has a lot of debt. There is so much that subsidiaries report how much of it they account for. No one adds the subsidiary total to the original Total.

Except for Federal Reserve USA: Which measures "Flow of Funds," a different kind of accounting.

And in that too: There is really no deity about it!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Problem is that the flies seem attracted to the crow, maybe? USA! USA! USA! NRA! NRA! (SPCA! SPCA!)!)

Accounting and accountants is the answer. A giant Corporation has a lot of debt. There is so much that subsidiaries report how much of it they account for. No one adds the subsidiary total to the original Total.

Adding it together would be total debt.

What's "net debt"?
 
Adding it would be counting some twice. The Corporation reports its debt, including all subsidiary accounting. That accounting, a separate report, has to be subtracted in a Total Reporting--already a part of a Corporate Debt sheet. The subsidiary sheets can no longer be in a Total reporting.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many say Great White Sheets of history: Need to Wash-out all other sheets, even(?)!
 
Adding it would be counting some twice. The Corporation reports its debt, including all subsidiary accounting. That accounting, a separate report, has to be subtracted in a Total Reporting--already a part of a Corporate Debt sheet. The subsidiary sheets can no longer be in a Total reporting.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many say Great White Sheets of history: Need to Wash-out all other sheets, even(?)!

Adding it would be counting some twice.

Do you have any examples?

The subsidiary sheets can no longer be in a Total reporting.

Subsidiary A has $20 million in debt and Subsidiary B has $70 million in debt.
Add them together and you see Corporation C has $90 million in debt.

That's total debt, not net debt.

Anyone else use the term "net debt"? Ever?

Maybe if you post the link from the OP that says......
"US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril."

Thanks!
 
Bureau of Economic Analysis was computing Total Net Debt in the 1960's and 1970's, and Census had the historical series. So anyone looks at the report of the Corporation debt load of $90.0, mil., the report of two thought to be additional subsidiaries: And concludes $180.00: That is a debt report, but not Total Nebt Debt.

Analysts create the final report from all the various sources which have the total of the reports, everywhere available.

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Brave Warrior take many squaw, so young papoose have only one mama, or many(?). Hmmmm!)
 
Bureau of Economic Analysis was computing Total Net Debt in the 1960's and 1970's, and Census had the historical series. So anyone looks at the report of the Corporation debt load of $90.0, mil., the report of two thought to be additional subsidiaries: And concludes $180.00: That is a debt report, but not Total Nebt Debt.

Analysts create the final report from all the various sources which have the total of the reports, everywhere available.

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Brave Warrior take many squaw, so young papoose have only one mama, or many(?). Hmmmm!)

Bureau of Economic Analysis was computing Total Net Debt in the 1960's and 1970's, and Census had the historical series.

Please post a link to either.
 
Immaterial, unnecessary, and public information. The answer to the question is in the cited message.

Bureau of Economic Analysis, in fact, is even a fairly public link. Suggesting that every Bureau of Economic page--going back in its history--- has not been linked is likely accurate. BEA goes farther back than the internet. BEA does exist, and even links that BEA has online can be said to exist themselves. Before the internet, there really was BEA!

All I have are page numbers, and so on.

Request is for links, Not For page numbers: Anyone can see that so!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(White Eyes always counter with marks on paper, not with links and higher forms!)
 
Immaterial, unnecessary, and public information. The answer to the question is in the cited message.

Bureau of Economic Analysis, in fact, is even a fairly public link. Suggesting that every Bureau of Economic page--going back in its history--- has not been linked is likely accurate. BEA goes farther back than the internet. BEA does exist, and even links that BEA has online can be said to exist themselves. Before the internet, there really was BEA!

All I have are page numbers, and so on.

Request is for links, Not For page numbers: Anyone can see that so!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!'
(White Eyes always counter with marks on paper, not with links and higher forms!)

BEA does exist, and even links that BEA has online can be said to exist themselves. Before the internet, there really was BEA!

And none of the links say, "Net debt is about $80 trillion"
 
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and clearly applies(?). The BEA series went to Budget Cuts in the Carter Administration. FRB Flow of Funds tends to be widely quoted in recent estimates of Total Net Debt, though it may not be. That is why I allude to the BEA formulation.

Mainly Republican Party Conservatives--any moderates or liberals too--tend not to much notice even US Federal Deficits. The Trump Administration so loves them it keeps cutting taxes, and proposing more tax cuts.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(If no one buys silly marks on paper, or perceives fiscal problems backing the paper: Lands of Many Nations do stand ready to offer a Manhattan Buy-Back, in valueable Turquoise to boot--$24.99, a special deal!)
 
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, and clearly applies(?). The BEA series went to Budget Cuts in the Carter Administration. FRB Flow of Funds tends to be widely quoted in recent estimates of Total Net Debt, though it may not be. That is why I allude to the BEA formulation.

Mainly Republican Party Conservatives--any moderates or liberals too--tend not to much notice even US Federal Deficits. The Trump Administration so loves them it keeps cutting taxes, and proposing more tax cuts.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(If no one buys silly marks on paper, or perceives fiscal problems backing the paper: Lands of Many Nations do stand ready to offer a Manhattan Buy-Back, in valueable Turquoise to boot--$24.99, a special deal!)

You have no source that says, "Net debt is about $80 trillion"
 
Yardeni Research makes a chart available, more current than FRED research. "Total Debt" is the chart title, and my caveat goes back to the Carter Administration and before.

You're not too up on things, so going further is pointless.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mostly "Funds-Rarely-Flow-To-Lands-Of-Many-Nations:" Is also commonly reported.)
 
Last edited:
Yardeni Research makes a chart available, more current than FRED research. "Total Debt" is the chart title, and my caveat goes back to the Carter Administration and before.

You're not too up on things, so going further is pointless.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mostly "Funds-Rarely-Flow-To-Lands-Of-Many-Nations:" Is also commonly reported.)

"Total Debt" is the chart title

"Total debt" makes sense, "Net debt" not so much.

You're not too up on things, so going further is pointless.

For some reason, I react when I see gibberish.
 
Everyone else can even Google that "Net Debt" and "Total Debt" are genuinely synonymous.

Point-free Toddsterpatriot poster: Waltzed right in to the personal glaring deficiencies, (of Toddsterpatriot poster)!

Not to worry anyone: Some posters simply will never know(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mental Deficiencies among many White Eyes start with Deut 23: 19-23, causing the Holocaust of the believers--Not including the Christians who managed to actually shoot back(?)! As United Nations may tend to describe it: "So many trainloads, So many waiting!" Surely Trump Administration can find a suitable remedy for the Justice Miscarriage(?)!)
 
US Federal Reserve estimates Total Net Debt to be about $80.0 tril.: About the number of deities alleged in all of history--not that pre-humans of any type knew anything about that. The Hebrew calendar only goes back 6000 to 7000 years. Everyone else clocks in about 4.0 bil. years. Humans had come out of the primordial rain forest only about 5000 years ago: Even creating farming, and all by themselves.

Humans could eat, get fat, large, and dominating of one another. An exiled Egyptian Prince would be able to actually help write down a lot stories about what happened next. One thing happening was counting. Primitives of the last century, finally discovered, understood one, two, and many. Conquering and subjugating Egypt was far more advanced than that. It could not only count, but create, and construct. It could count its own peoples, and other peoples: And learn to kill them, enslave them, and create additional time-off for other inventions.

One thing new was usury. Just numbers themselves could be manipulated. One thing plus one thing could be two things. One woman could multiply even more things. Two women could multiply even more things. And so numbers were able to be multiplied. And then counting could be assigned, even to things that mattered. Mail toiler had five plow sticks, and could trade one for other stuff. By the By, numbers could be assigned so that some had way more, and could exchange them for even labor, materials, food, clothing, animals, and anything else.

Then others had less. One number applied to all the others could create very rich people, and people with less to exchange. The market place arose, able to support the more greatly numbered. They could use the numbers to subjugate the lesser numbers: Early labor.

So Moses came up with Deut. 23:19-20. Primitive Israel would not do usury arithmetic like that amongst one another. Everyone else they could set to subjugation with joyful abandon. The one peoples could be a nation just doing math to everyone else. At least one king could see himself blessed with so many numbers as to be able to take on many of the women multipliers, and make them--whatever happened in history.

Other nations were also able to subjugate their own peoples--laboring slaves and educated democracy participants, most famously arose. So one or more carpenters could notice that numbers on one side of a board rectangle could apply to a diagonal from the lower left to the upper right. Little lines could be drawn from the left side to the diagonal: And just like usury. Then a line could be drawn down the middle, parallel to the left side. Up at the top, there were more little lines in some of the space. At the bottom there were no lines at all in the space. So if people at those levels on the board went to a market--they were worthless. The marketplace needed that gap filled.

So Alexander the Great would start to spread concepts like that around--not entirely consciously or deliberately.

New Testament Matthew 25: 14-30 would show the usury outcome--the Foreclosure Crisis of of 2008, 2009. New Testament Matthew 20:1-16 would remedy the problem of the missing lines at the lower levels. Everyone could go to market with something, plus some newly earned--and regardless if they had worked all the (year) or not: Like the Obama refundable, equal-amount refundable: Make Work Pay Income Tax Credit.

That's a fast-forward. "Good Without A God" was not applied.

And certainly not by New Testament, subject the Gospels. Certainly not Mohammed, who would only condemn wealth from usury. Certainly not Adam Smith, appreciative of accumulation and sloth. Certain not Karl Marx, who would backtrack to "Kill everyone in sight:" No new numbering method applied. Keynes would pick up on the numbers, but not the remedy method, only the usury method. John Kenneth Galbraith would also leave that out of any explanations. Milton Friedman, and any remaining followers, would offer no such remedy.

US President Nixon had created a reliance on usury-based wage and price guidelines. Senator George McGovern had proposed and equal amount, national remedy--at last. President Ford would launch equal amount tax rebates. Congress would create the per child equal amount tax credit, advertised directly as a remedy for the heinous and usury based: Regressive payroll tax. Later on, in 1986: Then Congress would raise and index the standard deduction and personal exemptions in the tax code. By the time of the Bush Presidency, after the first one: So many people were off the tax rolls that tax cuts offered no stimulus at all to the economy.

And famously now: There are giant federal deficits, and fears of a global recession.

There is no deity about it.

A description would appear in the Free Venice Beach, mid-1980's, an underground paper, famous author, Ken Kesey had been a founder.

Only last year, Nigeria could create "Traders Moni," as first-time-ever-in history equal amounts of credit for 2.0 mil. micro-businesses. When the credit is repaid, then a new limit is created, equally, at a higher amount. It can be called credit, but not wealth from Riba: Nigeria being Commonwealth, but also nearly half Moslem.

So Look Ma! No Deity!

Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(White Eyes soar like Great Crow of Liberation(?)!)


I don't know what you are smoking but you should try pot. I'm sure you'll get better results.
 
Everyone else can even Google that "Net Debt" and "Total Debt" are genuinely synonymous.

Point-free Toddsterpatriot poster: Waltzed right in to the personal glaring deficiencies, (of Toddsterpatriot poster)!

Not to worry anyone: Some posters simply will never know(?)!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Mental Deficiencies among many White Eyes start with Deut 23: 19-23, causing the Holocaust of the believers--Not including the Christians who managed to actually shoot back(?)! As United Nations may tend to describe it: "So many trainloads, So many waiting!" Surely Trump Administration can find a suitable remedy for the Justice Miscarriage(?)!)

Everyone else can even Google that "Net Debt" and "Total Debt" are genuinely synonymous.

Cool story, bro.

So post a link to the Fed, or the Treasury, or Merrill, or Goldman, or the World Bank, or the IMF, or any real source where they discuss $80 trillion "Net Debt".
 
The Diligence is done, as $72.0 tril from some sources--one year outdated--is approaching $80.0 tril. in others, estimated more currently.

And without the poetic license of allusion to previous accounting: Total Net Debt at BEA!.

Some will even say that there is no arithmetic, anywhere in the Bible. And so others will say that nobody does it, in public statutes. Support of the Law of Lethal denigration is at The Fed, Treasury, Merrill, Goldman, the World Bank, and IMF and all the sources! That is the law! Interest rates on loans, savings, and notes; Pay Raise Computing, National Laws like Social Security COLA and others; statutory raises and others: Is clearly intentionally supported, And shown indirectly by Toddsterpatriot poster!

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Now to get them to all go back where they came from(?)!)
 
The Diligence is done, as $72.0 tril from some sources--one year outdated--is approaching $80.0 tril. in others, estimated more currently.

And without the poetic license of allusion to previous accounting: Total Net Debt at BEA!.

Some will even say that there is no arithmetic, anywhere in the Bible. And so others will say that nobody does it, in public statutes. Support of the Law of Lethal denigration is at The Fed, Treasury, Merrill, Goldman, the World Bank, and IMF and all the sources! That is the law! Interest rates on loans, savings, and notes; Pay Raise Computing, National Laws like Social Security COLA and others; statutory raises and others: Is clearly intentionally supported, And shown indirectly by Toddsterpatriot poster!

"Crow: James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Now to get them to all go back where they came from(?)!)

The Diligence is done, as $72.0 tril from some sources--one year outdated--is approaching $80.0 tril

Sources that say net?
 

Forum List

Back
Top