Snopes founder blew 98,000 on hookers we got pics now this garbage far left website is smearing TGP over US flags


Same ole, same ole. what the dems accuse you of their doing.


why are you so surprised?

Human beings are the most duplicitous creature to have ever existed

I'd be surprised to find someone who wasn't a hypocrite


Every conservative Republican thinks they aren't.

And you speak for every conservative republican?

Plenty of democrats think they're not hypocrites as well.

ALL people are hypocritical in one way or another


ALL conservatives are hypocrites. And those conservatives that aren't wealthy old white guys are delusional as well.
 
We don't have to do anything but laugh at you trump supporters trying to make this an issue after your boy trump paid 2-300,000 to a porn star and a playboy nude model to be quiet about him fucking them and cheating on his pregnant wife.

Trump never claimed to be a "moral compass".

He could kill someone in cold blood and you'd be tossing his salad.
So

You are one very sad person.
 
So we're saying that blowing $98,000 on hookers is a BAD thing, then?

:dunno:

Depends. I "blow" 20k/mo each on two bisexual sugar baby's. Well worth it!!!!!
You're paying too much. Prices have dropped. Strippers are all sitting at home not on laps.

He's not paying anything...he is so full of shit it bubbles out his ears.

Keep thinking that, then add it to the 99% of those thing you've believed in your life that have been wrong.
 

The founder of the far left Internet website Snopes, which brags of being the moral compass for what is honest reporting on the Internet, allegedly embezzled and spent nearly $100,000 on prostitutes during his divorce.
Snopes Founder Blew $98,000 on Hookers — We Got Pics — Now This Garbage Far Left Website is Smearing TGP Over US Flags


Snope's one of the pigest left ass sites there is. These losers were used to feed the American sheep every lie there was. Most Obama asses used this site because hte idiots saw this as the truth bible and omg it proved their little leftist bitch innocent every time. I wonder why.

And then dummies really can't figure out how crooked they are just by the fact Obama and Clinton made it a point to mention this site to their idiots who used it as the die hard truth bible lmfao-------and no FACT CHECK isn't any better and neither is politfact......THEY ARE LEFTIST LEANING and get SOROS donation gawd ppl follow the gawd dam money!!!


That's still 32,000 below what trump paid for just one.

So much winning....
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
WHICH IS questioning the methodology of connectivity which has to be done in an even standard least there be hypocracy. :)
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
WHICH IS questioning the methodology of connectivity which has to be done in an even standard least there be hypocracy. :)


I just see you try to question the messenger not the message.
 
We don't have to do anything but laugh at you trump supporters trying to make this an issue after your boy trump paid 2-300,000 to a porn star and a playboy nude model to be quiet about him fucking them and cheating on his pregnant wife.
The snopes founder spent half as much, but the whores he was porking were ugly as fuck. Playboy models and porn stars are in a whole 'nother league. WAY better than those snopes dogs.
 
I spent WAYY more than that on concerts, cars, bikes,boats, airline tickets,resorts, Bacardi and blow to get some pussy.
That stupid snopes guy should have paid a few bucks more for some pornstar or playboy pussy.
 
We don't have to do anything but laugh at you trump supporters trying to make this an issue after your boy trump paid 2-300,000 to a porn star and a playboy nude model to be quiet about him fucking them and cheating on his pregnant wife.
The snopes founder spent half as much, but the whores he was porking were ugly as fuck. Playboy models and porn stars are in a whole 'nother league. WAY better than those snopes dogs.


And there we have it. Wingnut rationalizations
 
We don't have to do anything but laugh at you trump supporters trying to make this an issue after your boy trump paid 2-300,000 to a porn star and a playboy nude model to be quiet about him fucking them and cheating on his pregnant wife.
The snopes founder spent half as much, but the whores he was porking were ugly as fuck. Playboy models and porn stars are in a whole 'nother league. WAY better than those snopes dogs.


And there we have it. Wingnut rationalizations
Would you rather pork one of those ugly ones that the snopes guy was doing, or would you rather have some porn star or playboy pussy?
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
WHICH IS questioning the methodology of connectivity which has to be done in an even standard least there be hypocracy. :)


I just see you try to question the messenger not the message.
Reflective mirror time: listen to your own words, this is what you did. Instead of refuting and proving Snopes had no liberal agenda and ties to Clinton, you attacked the messenger with an
ad hominem reply. That is called trolling.
Checkmate-you traped yourself by arguing against yourself. :)
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
WHICH IS questioning the methodology of connectivity which has to be done in an even standard least there be hypocracy. :)


I just see you try to question the messenger not the message.
Reflective mirror time: listen to your own words, this is what you did. Instead of refuting and proving Snopes had no liberal agenda and ties to Clinton, you attacked the messenger with an
ad hominem reply. That is called trolling.
Checkmate-you traped yourself by arguing against yourself. :)

Wrong, I just tried to poke an idiot.
 
I did a thorough investigation of SNOPES a while back (see my conclusions on post in 2018):

Snopes is not a legit unbias fact check source, I noticed their fact checking was based on subjective opinion of flawed logic not actual investigation or hard evidence, so I dug into who owned the web site and found their parent co owned a Clinton web site which was also validated by another source that busts fake news and here is more:
Fact-Checking Snopes Website of Political ‘Fact-Checking' Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger

Snopes is already exposed by who owns them (Proper Media in liberal San Diego, California), exposing that Clinton and Snopes needs to hide who's behind their propaganda sites posing as journalism and that you don't know who owns or is behind your info.
Proper Media owns 'web properties' and
their execs are kept secret as is the web page ownerships through Perfect Privacy.

If you want to connect the dots to snopes then try:
Snopes owner that is Proper Media partners with BlueKai® that is Oracle
and Oracle is a partner of The Nature Conservancy, a liberal and active proponent of cap and trade and a carbon tax, they support planned parenthood and same sex marriage=have a liberal agenda.


Wheres Kevin Bacon in all that?
SO YOU ARE SAYING Rachel Maddow's methods of connecting the dots is faulty & she should be fired and you signed the petition to fire her and ban all MSM tabloid news? :)


I posted where's Kevin Bacon in all that.
WHICH IS questioning the methodology of connectivity which has to be done in an even standard least there be hypocracy. :)


I just see you try to question the messenger not the message.
Reflective mirror time: listen to your own words, this is what you did. Instead of refuting and proving Snopes had no liberal agenda and ties to Clinton, you attacked the messenger with an
ad hominem reply. That is called trolling.
Checkmate-you traped yourself by arguing against yourself. :)

Wrong, I just tried to poke an idiot.
But that's a double negative, so thanks for the compliment and validating my post about deflecting with ad hominem trolling responses.
chess-rage.jpg
 

The founder of the far left Internet website Snopes, which brags of being the moral compass for what is honest reporting on the Internet, allegedly embezzled and spent nearly $100,000 on prostitutes during his divorce.
Snopes Founder Blew $98,000 on Hookers — We Got Pics — Now This Garbage Far Left Website is Smearing TGP Over US Flags


Snope's one of the pigest left ass sites there is. These losers were used to feed the American sheep every lie there was. Most Obama asses used this site because hte idiots saw this as the truth bible and omg it proved their little leftist bitch innocent every time. I wonder why.

And then dummies really can't figure out how crooked they are just by the fact Obama and Clinton made it a point to mention this site to their idiots who used it as the die hard truth bible lmfao-------and no FACT CHECK isn't any better and neither is politfact......THEY ARE LEFTIST LEANING and get SOROS donation gawd ppl follow the gawd dam money!!!


That's still 32,000 below what trump paid for just one.

So much winning....
Trump got it half right! He said we would get sick.....of winning. Well we're getting sick.
 

Same ole, same ole. what the dems accuse you of their doing.


why are you so surprised?

Human beings are the most duplicitous creature to have ever existed

I'd be surprised to find someone who wasn't a hypocrite


Every conservative Republican thinks they aren't.

And you speak for every conservative republican?

Plenty of democrats think they're not hypocrites as well.

ALL people are hypocritical in one way or another


ALL conservatives are hypocrites. And those conservatives that aren't wealthy old white guys are delusional as well.



1587043835629.png
 

Forum List

Back
Top