Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But he did. He claimed Saddam bought uranium from Niger. It's known as the Yellowcake Forgeries.Oh, not that tired old "Bush Lied" crap again. That has been disproven so many times, yet y'all repeat it over and over.
I agree that this is lame, especially in light of the fact that AlGore and company hampered the first few months in office, not to mention all the foot dragging by the Democrats in Congress to get appointments confirmed.And who had a PDB entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" come across his desk on August 6th 2001?...While he was on vacation in Crawford?.....
But he did. He claimed Saddam bought uranium from Niger. It's known as the Yellowcake Forgeries.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yellowcake_Forgery
During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim could not be substantiated with evidence. The Butler Report is believed to be the source for the claim and the British Government continues to believe it is accurate.[/quote]. [emphasis mine]
Just because, doesn't mean that the consensus among intelligence sources is that the reports are accuate.The classified documents... had allegedly been suspected by some individuals in U.S. intelligence as fraudulent according to news reports
I'm tired of lies by Democrats claiming that Bush lied. It's lame.
From your source:Just because they believe it's accurate doesn't necessarily mean it is accurate. I'm more than willing to bet my money that it is inaccurate.During the 2003 State of the Union speech, U.S. President George W. Bush said, "The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa." The British claim could not be substantiated with evidence. The Butler Report is believed to be the source for the claim and the British Government continues to believe it is accurate.[/quote]. [emphasis mine]
Just because , doesn't mean that the consensus among intelligence sources is that the reports are accuate.
I'm tired of lies by Democrats claiming that Bush lied. It's lame.
You know what, I'm tired of the lies on both sides. I'm sick of the lies from Bush (mostly him) and the Democrats. But that's life, ain't it?
Based on what I've read, Clinton himself isn't that bothered with it. I doubt he'd sue.
Just because they believe it's accurate doesn't necessarily mean it is accurate. I'm more than willing to bet my money that it is inaccurate.
....
So what is your definition of 'lie' then, becasue it doesn't seem to fit the Webster version.
Not admitting that you are wrong on this while continuing to politic on it appears to meet the definition of 'lie' more closely.
OUCH! That could leave a mark.....:whip3:
And who had a PDB entitled "Bin Laden determined to strike in US" come across his desk on August 6th 2001?...While he was on vacation in Crawford?
Who cares if the TV show has a few minor inaccuracies. The overriding theme still is true. Clinton was more wrapped up with adultery than with keeping us safe. Our President Bush has kept us safe. I live in constant fear that some day we will be hit again. But knowing that our President is on duty makes me less afraid. But what are we going to do when our President's term is up? Maybe our Vice President Cheney would change his mind and replace President Bush. Or maybe Mr. Rumsfeld. Has no one thought of Karl Rove? I believe all of these men practice family values, unlike some of the other potential candidates.
Who cares if the TV show has a few minor inaccuracies. The overriding theme still is true. Clinton was more wrapped up with adultery than with keeping us safe. Our President Bush has kept us safe. I live in constant fear that some day we will be hit again. But knowing that our President is on duty makes me less afraid. But what are we going to do when our President's term is up? Maybe our Vice President Cheney would change his mind and replace President Bush. Or maybe Mr. Rumsfeld. Has no one thought of Karl Rove? I believe all of these men practice family values, unlike some of the other potential candidates.