Should welfare recipients be allowed to breed?

[manifold]

I said nothing about the kids did I?

This is ALL on the parent.

Do you really think that a person who enters the welfare program with 2 kids should be able to have 10 more with no consequences?

So you support mandatory, tax-payer funded abortions for welfare recipients then?

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

 

[Skull Pilot]

Interesting.

And the kids could be inducted into the Surrogate Labor Action Vindication Employment force or S.L.A.V.E, to offset the cost of the welfare.

Hmm..this is really starting to gel.

I said nothing about the kids did I?

This is ALL on the parent.

Do you really think that a person who enters the welfare program with 2 kids should be able to have 10 more with no consequences?

Naw..there should be consequences for everything. In fact..life is just one be consequence!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcCXnXDiKoQ]YouTube - ‪Bugs bunny and Daffy Duck the happy miser‬‏[/ame]

So you agree with me.

 

[Skull Pilot]

So you support mandatory, tax-payer funded abortions for welfare recipients then?

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

No it's the parent of the children that are saying that.

If there was no incentive to keep pumping out welfare puppies then people would stop pumping out welfare puppies.

You have the right to have as many rug rats as you want but you don't have the right to have someone else pay for them.

 

[manifold]

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

No it's the parent of the children that are saying that.

Perhaps.

But you're certainly willing to slide on in there for sloppy seconds.

 

[Sallow]

I said nothing about the kids did I?

This is ALL on the parent.

Do you really think that a person who enters the welfare program with 2 kids should be able to have 10 more with no consequences?

Naw..there should be consequences for everything. In fact..life is just one be consequence!

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rcCXnXDiKoQ]YouTube - ‪Bugs bunny and Daffy Duck the happy miser‬‏[/ame]

So you agree with me.

Yes..all this breeding must stop.

For the sake of the children.

Oh..and check out this song..it's by the Breeders.

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0RiJMZQXa2o]YouTube - ‪The Breeders - Cannonball‬‏[/ame]

 

[Skull Pilot]

[youtube]nBgmC_USeoM[/youtube]

Been around the world and found
That only stupid people are breeding
The cretins cloning and feeding
And I don't even own a TV

 

[Sallow]

[youtube]nBgmC_USeoM[/youtube]

Been around the world and found
That only stupid people are breeding
The cretins cloning and feeding
And I don't even own a TV

Yes but..

Put me in the hospital for nerves
And then they had to commit me
You told them all I was crazy
They cut off my legs now I'm an amputee, Goddamn you

 

[Lonestar_logic]

So you support mandatory, tax-payer funded abortions for welfare recipients then?

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

How did people survive before governmental welfare programs?

 

[Mr Natural]

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

How did people survive before governmental welfare programs?

Not good.

Hence the reason we have governmental welfare programs.

 

[Skull Pilot]

No I would just refuse additional benefits.

It's called personal responsibility people.

I have no problem helping a person truly in need but I will not help anyone who is intentionally scamming me.

if a woman with 2 kids finds herself in a dire situation, then she should receive some aid to shelter and feed her kids until such a time as she can manage herself. But to say that she can enter the system with 2 kids and have unlimited benefit increases by having more kids is fucking moronic.

I understand your emotionally charged sentiment.

But at the end of the day what you're effectively saying is fuck the children.

How did people survive before governmental welfare programs?

They obviously didn't that's why there are so many people on the dole now.

 

[manifold]

How did people survive before indoor plumbing? I don't know but somehow they did and thats a great argument for not piping the shit right out of your house!

 

[Sallow]

How did people survive before indoor plumbing? I don't know but somehow they did and thats a great argument for not piping the shit right out of your house!

Hey the whole cholera thing was overblown..

Ah the good ol' days.

 

[dblack]

Well, pretty much everybody gets 'welfare' of one form or another - so let's quit beating around the bush. We should come up with solid state policy that applies to everyone. I think we could probably do something like this in the form of a tax 'incentive'. Or penalty - or, well, I guess we could call it whatever is politically expedient at the moment. The basic idea would be to penalize people who have kids (or, reward those who don't). And then maybe some kind of penalty on people who have dumb kids. Or, likewise, a reward for those who have smart kids.

We simply must get control of the situation. It's getting out of hand!

 

[Flopper]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Stopping those seniors from breeding should really turn things around. What other brilliant ideas do you have?

 

[manifold]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Stopping those seniors from breeding should really turn things around. What other brilliant ideas do you have?

Free weed and titties for everyone.

 

[Sallow]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Stopping those seniors from breeding should really turn things around. What other brilliant ideas do you have?

Zombie Ronald Reagan for President?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cyKYiJkvg98]YouTube - ‪Zombie Reagan Raised From Grave To Lead GOP The Onion - America's Finest News Source.mp4‬‏[/ame]

 

[Contumacious]

Should welfare recipients be allowed to breed?

Wrong question.

You should have asked "Does the welfare/warfare state have the authority to re-institute slavery?

Was The Thirteenth Amendment of the US Constitution abolished?

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

.

 

[Sheldon]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

Stopping those seniors from breeding should really turn things around. What other brilliant ideas do you have?

Free weed and titties for everyone.

Socialist.

 

[Spoonman]

It's a clear conflict of interest. They are not stakeholders when they are taking and not giving, and their breeding reflects it. They should not be able to breed. Two clarifications:

1) I am talking about all forms of welfare, including social security and medicare. You are living on someone else's money, it's welfare.

2) I am only not allowing them to breed for one year after they take a welfare check. Once they become a full citizen who is a stakeholder in our country again, they get to breed again.

Note: Thread inspired by kaz

yes, but i think there should be limits on how much child support they can receive

 

[Spoonman]

Should welfare recipients be allowed to breed?

Wrong question.

You should have asked "Does the welfare/warfare state have the authority to re-institute slavery?

Was The Thirteenth Amendment of the US Constitution abolished?

Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.

.

But that never said anything about supporting them.