Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
When They Swallow Their Pride Under Unpaid Education, They Choke Their TalentIt's important that the scientific community weighs in our daily decisions as consumers...
I've often described and criticized the destructive behaviors of wingers.RiiiightActually, I've had many, many squabbles with the illiberal, authoritarian Regressive Lefties here on this very topic.More hypocrisy from the king of identity politics everyone.You know someone is afraid when they start trying to ban things.
Bet you staged one or two of the bannings of conservatives speaking at the scumbag universities around the country.
Do you have your very own Malcolm X hat?
Do you go out of your way to constantly be wrong about my viewpoints? Seriously, do you have any shame at all?
If your memory were not so distorted by your ideology, you might remember these memes that I made and posted here.
Brilliant try, Einstein.
Do you know what hypocrisy is? You can argue whatever you want. At the end of the day YOU VOTE FOR THE MARXISTS.
Is there ANYTHING Trump has done that you agree with? How about the economy?
Try not crediting obama like you always do, or else I will need to post how the democrats directly contributed to the economic crash of 2008. I have pasted the official archives of exactly when the democrats DELIBERATELY ignored every warning.
So, back to Trump and this propaganda issue. Where or why do you suppose all of these leftists act like they do? Hmmmm?
You claim you argue with them, but are you acknowledging why they think the way they do?
How do you think propaganda works? You love to claim that I think the way I think cause of conservative radio. You point that out a lot. That is your go to.
So, why do you suppose they think the way they do? Remember, you claim you argue with them all of the time.
Agreed.Scientific propaganda as used in the mass media (e.x. popsi articles as a form of advertising or the perpetuation of scientific or scientist superstitions to the masses) relies on the average 100 IQ and 6th grade reading level of its misinformed consumers, via its childish spread of scientific mythology, popular superstitions, and false historical methods, associated with either as an industry or system, primarily for the purpose of consumerist 'marketing' and the selling of frivolous and fatuous consumer products, such as cell phones, washing machines, and things of that nature.
Higher education and intellectual inquisitiveness whether historical, methododical, logical, philosophical, anything else more or less renders all of these urban legends, modern superstitions, fables, narratives, and nonsensical predictions irrelevant and not taken seriously above the 100 IQ or 6th grade reading level to begin with (many of whom uneducated 'bubbas' aren't even so much as able deconflate the actual scientific information and the reading and subject matter comprehension thereof, from the archaic, simplistic 6th grade reading level low entry level-education methodologies and rote repetition which even a 5 year old could do, devoid of any deeper level learning(s) or comphension, archaic holdovers and relics from the 19th century they are to begin with, and an outdated, 'fast food' substitute for higher level intellectual education and or learning methodologies and systems, like those of Rhodes Scholar Edward De Bono...), nor within any contemporary higher-level academic industry, being primarily driving and filled with outdated 19th century scientific information and associated axioms to begin with, many if not most of which have been debunked or rendered obsolete within more contemporary, higher level research and or developments within those and / or other fields (such as the "systems sciences" by physicist Fritjof Capra, and his other writings such as the Dao of physics).
In other nonsensical instances, the propaganda and marketing in question even relies on popular and mass education on the bare basis of their own law, medical and /or legal institutions, and so on (such as falsely conflating "medicine" as an industry and its history thereof with natural sciences, or the use of 'scientific' jargon in propaganda and advertising to sell snake oil to the uninformed and superstitious).
Banning and eliminating scientific propaganda in America, Britain, and Western Europe (or other nations as well) would be a huge progressive step forward, as it would all thinking men and women of some contemporary intelligence or affinity for reading and learning the ability to read about the natural sciences, the history of them and their founder Francis Bacon's, as well as what said inductive method is limited to in practice and scope, with the use and abuse of anti-intellectual scientific propaganda and said mass media pedagogues thereof, whether childish and intellectually vapid idiots, liars, charlatans or demagogues. like Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins or anyone else, demonstrating a bare basic lack of knowledge about the rudiments of their own institutions, whether scientific, legal, political or otherwise, whether by an archaic 19th century standard or a contemporary 21st century and Information Age one, whose career would be out of business if anyone read or wrote at above a 6th grade reading level, or if the average national IQs in America and Britain were a paltry 10 points higher.
Don't feed the troll.
And what of it? When the 'right' side of history restores order you and and your ilk will comply whether you like it or not, as per the law and its authors.Agreed.Scientific propaganda as used in the mass media (e.x. popsi articles as a form of advertising or the perpetuation of scientific or scientist superstitions to the masses) relies on the average 100 IQ and 6th grade reading level of its misinformed consumers, via its childish spread of scientific mythology, popular superstitions, and false historical methods, associated with either as an industry or system, primarily for the purpose of consumerist 'marketing' and the selling of frivolous and fatuous consumer products, such as cell phones, washing machines, and things of that nature.
Higher education and intellectual inquisitiveness whether historical, methododical, logical, philosophical, anything else more or less renders all of these urban legends, modern superstitions, fables, narratives, and nonsensical predictions irrelevant and not taken seriously above the 100 IQ or 6th grade reading level to begin with (many of whom uneducated 'bubbas' aren't even so much as able deconflate the actual scientific information and the reading and subject matter comprehension thereof, from the archaic, simplistic 6th grade reading level low entry level-education methodologies and rote repetition which even a 5 year old could do, devoid of any deeper level learning(s) or comphension, archaic holdovers and relics from the 19th century they are to begin with, and an outdated, 'fast food' substitute for higher level intellectual education and or learning methodologies and systems, like those of Rhodes Scholar Edward De Bono...), nor within any contemporary higher-level academic industry, being primarily driving and filled with outdated 19th century scientific information and associated axioms to begin with, many if not most of which have been debunked or rendered obsolete within more contemporary, higher level research and or developments within those and / or other fields (such as the "systems sciences" by physicist Fritjof Capra, and his other writings such as the Dao of physics).
In other nonsensical instances, the propaganda and marketing in question even relies on popular and mass education on the bare basis of their own law, medical and /or legal institutions, and so on (such as falsely conflating "medicine" as an industry and its history thereof with natural sciences, or the use of 'scientific' jargon in propaganda and advertising to sell snake oil to the uninformed and superstitious).
Banning and eliminating scientific propaganda in America, Britain, and Western Europe (or other nations as well) would be a huge progressive step forward, as it would all thinking men and women of some contemporary intelligence or affinity for reading and learning the ability to read about the natural sciences, the history of them and their founder Francis Bacon's, as well as what said inductive method is limited to in practice and scope, with the use and abuse of anti-intellectual scientific propaganda and said mass media pedagogues thereof, whether childish and intellectually vapid idiots, liars, charlatans or demagogues. like Bill Nye, Richard Dawkins or anyone else, demonstrating a bare basic lack of knowledge about the rudiments of their own institutions, whether scientific, legal, political or otherwise, whether by an archaic 19th century standard or a contemporary 21st century and Information Age one, whose career would be out of business if anyone read or wrote at above a 6th grade reading level, or if the average national IQs in America and Britain were a paltry 10 points higher.
Don't feed the troll.
Problem is there are far too many on the authoritarian right who would support such a ‘ban.’
The Baconian natural sciences and the archaic 17th century inductive method that it's based on is an archaic and outdated industry, no more relevant in the real world than Blockbuster video, and eventually to go the way of the Catholic church, reduced to a culturally irrelevant archaism, many of whose workmen are less successful at actual sexual reproduction than the average ape is.What would be more appropriate to ban are media idiots incapable of understanding experiments and scientific methods in general. They are the ones who delight in broadcasting novel findings based on a single publication. But, speech should not be banned, ultimately we have only ourselves to blame if we cannot differentiate blather from actual scientific findings.
