Should we always believe women accusers?

  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #3
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Believing them has nothing to do with proving a crime.

You disprove a lie by proving you were never there. She still has to prove you did something to her.
 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Believing them has nothing to do with proving a crime.

You disprove a lie by proving you were never there. She still has to prove you did something to her.
What if she's to ugly to rape?
 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Believing them has nothing to do with proving a crime.

You disprove a lie by proving you were never there. She still has to prove you did something to her.
What if she's to ugly to rape?
Rape is about power not about if someone is pretty or not.
 
Like the one that always yells at the top of their lungs "fake News". Should we always believe that fool?
:5_1_12024:

 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Believing them has nothing to do with proving a crime.

You disprove a lie by proving you were never there. She still has to prove you did something to her.
What if she's to ugly to rape?
 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Believing them has nothing to do with proving a crime.

You disprove a lie by proving you were never there. She still has to prove you did something to her.
What if she's to ugly to rape?

Rape is about power not about if someone is pretty or not. Thats why some men rape elderly women.
 

YES lets believe scumbags TRUMP Thomas and Kavinough ,,, Franken had the decency to walk away Republicans and granpaw have no honor
 

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...
 

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...

I think women should be believed until it can be proven they are lying.
 
Only if I have substantial proof of the claim. But the majority of rape claims are bogus bullshit by manipulative women who regret consenting to it. To assassinate the character of any man who pisses them off.
 
No, we shouldn't believe all women since they can and will lie. They are often sensitive when it comes to child custody battles, so in that situation, many women will lie to keep their children.
 

YES lets believe scumbags TRUMP Thomas and Kavinough ,,, Franken had the decency to walk away Republicans and granpaw have no honor



Photographic evidence of Franken misstep.

Kavanaugh and Thomas?

He said, she said....

no evidence or proof of accusation.

(Are you forgetting B Clinton denied his actions, til the day he left office?)
 
Yes we should believe them until its settled in court or disproven with evidence prior to trial.
Aren't we supposed to prove a crime occurred rather than your supposition that we have to prove it didn't?

How do you disprove a lie? What if you really are innocent but have no alibi because you were home alone at the time of the alleged crime?
Are you kidding? This is the era of Mueller!
 

Always is a big word. So... “No.” Would seem to be the reasonable answer...

I think women should be believed until it can be proven they are lying.

Really? And why shouldn’t men be believed until it’s proved they are lying?
 

Forum List

Back
Top