Should NAMBLA's freedom of speech be infringed?

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by manifold, Nov 28, 2009.

?

Should NAMBLA's freedom of speech be infringed?

  1. Yes. The 1st Amendment shouldn't apply to low-life scum like NAMBLA

    14.3%
  2. No. Even the most vile speech should be protected by the 1st Amendment.

    85.7%
  1. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,687
    Thanks Received:
    7,226
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,725
    Everyone knows these scumbags are evil.

    And it seems many here would be just fine with the government stepping in and stripping them of the right to free speech.

    So let's see where everyone stands.
     
  2. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,687
    Thanks Received:
    7,226
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,725
    I fully expect to see at least 4 of you put your vote where your mouth is and vote yes.

    You know who you are.
     
  3. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    Silly Mani, expecting certain people to back up what they say with actions. :lol:
     
  4. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,687
    Thanks Received:
    7,226
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,725
    You know that by voting no, you support NAMBLA right? :lol:
     
  5. Modbert
    Offline

    Modbert Daydream Believer Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2008
    Messages:
    33,178
    Thanks Received:
    2,957
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +2,962
    :eek: That wasn't in the contract!?! :lol:
     
  6. xotoxi
    Offline

    xotoxi Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    30,322
    Thanks Received:
    5,203
    Trophy Points:
    1,110
    Location:
    your mother
    Ratings:
    +5,492
    What gives us the right to be discussing the First Amendment openly in a public forum???
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  7. chanel
    Offline

    chanel Silver Member

    Joined:
    Jun 8, 2009
    Messages:
    12,130
    Thanks Received:
    2,746
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    People's Republic of NJ
    Ratings:
    +2,749
    Yes. Hate speech, inciting violence, and death threats are currently prohibited. If NAMBLA is soliciting sex with minors, that is criminal. If their speech is confined to adults only websites, then they should be monitored by law enforcement. If they've committed no crime, they have nothing to fear. People who fuck children should accept that minor intrusion on their privacy. Either that, or be de-balled.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Wry Catcher
    Offline

    Wry Catcher Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2009
    Messages:
    31,738
    Thanks Received:
    4,241
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Location:
    San Francisco Bay Area
    Ratings:
    +8,151
    I detest false choice polls, and therefore vote present. I detest 'worser' those who abuse children, in any way, shape or form.
     
  9. manifold
    Offline

    manifold Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2008
    Messages:
    48,687
    Thanks Received:
    7,226
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Location:
    your dreams
    Ratings:
    +20,725
    What is the false choice? :confused:
     
  10. The Rabbi
    Offline

    The Rabbi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2009
    Messages:
    67,619
    Thanks Received:
    7,821
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Nashville
    Ratings:
    +18,214
    It is a false choice.
    What is their "free speech"? It is the ability propagate their repugnant views and try to persuade people that sex with underage boys is OK? Then I support their continued ability to do that, as much as I oppose their objective.
    If their free speech consists of actively trying to entice young boys into illegal relationships then that is criminal and they need to be prosecuted. There is a big difference between arguing for legalization of drugs and selling illegal drugs.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 5

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

nambla lowlife