occupied
Diamond Member
- Nov 8, 2011
- 36,705
- 17,202
- 1,590
You call yourself the "Questioner" but you kind of suck at asking questions. What do you really want to know?Corruption is corruption, has nothing inherently to do with arbitrary or imaginary "power" relations, which even Saul Alinsky himself said is all an illusion, not all "power", imaginary as it is being equal or equally desirable to begin with.The powerful should be shot as soon as they think they are above reproach by the common rabble. How do you like that you fucking loon?No, it really shouldn't - people criticizing the rich should be shot.Fuck no!Should criticizing the rich be illegal?
It should be the national pass-time.
Critiizing human behaviors such as "greed", "miserliness" is one thing, but in practice no one believes that "wealth" automatically equates to these things to begin with, as evidenced by their own miserly behaviors and unwillingness to part with their wealth and socioeconomic status of a 1st world country, which is "wealthy" compared to most of the 3rd world countries.
So idiots criticizing "the rich", (usually rich pedogogues) themselves as a stereotyped "demographic" and trying to drum up anarchy and "class warfare" should simply be shot.
A billion dollars, of course has less "power" than a knife or a gun in the event one was mugged, its power or what people imagine its power to be is meaningless outside of whatever arbitrary "faith" one puts in it to begin with.
Corrupt people should be prevented from being in power to begin with, but of course the reality is that most anti-intellectual media is simply preying on misinformation via class warfare sentiments, and preying on the immoral ways of man. Immoral people living materialistically and selfishly, impoverished as a result of their own consumerism shouldn't have any say in regards to serious men and women in business, law, society, or life in general.