Should Congressmen have a “Top Loss” position on the debt?

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
May 20, 2009
144,271
66,587
2,330
All of the finance experts here need to chime in.

Trump was responsible for the debts he incurred in the busted Atlantic City Casinos. When there was a deficit, he gave equity to his lenders in exchange for recasting the debt terms

Accordingly, shouldn’t our Congressman be the first ones that US Treasury holder go to if there’s any problem with repayment?
 
All of the finance experts here need to chime in.

Trump was responsible for the debts he incurred in the busted Atlantic City Casinos. When there was a deficit, he gave equity to his lenders in exchange for recasting the debt terms

Accordingly, shouldn’t our Congressman be the first ones that US Treasury holder go to if there’s any problem with repayment?
The debt is the debt, nothing can be done about it now.
What Congress should focus on is setting spending/tax levels at levels that reduce or eliminate the deficit.

I suggest a law requiring spending to be no more than 5% above revenues. To achieve the goal both sides would need to bend significantly.
 
The debt is the debt, nothing can be done about it now.
What Congress should focus on is setting spending/tax levels at levels that reduce or eliminate the deficit.

I suggest a law requiring spending to be no more than 5% above revenues. To achieve the goal both sides would need to bend significantly.
I fear the point of being able to ever repay the national debt has long past. This is the death of the dollar as we know it. It doesnt matter what happens, from this point forward, the dollar will founder.
 
I fear the point of being able to ever repay the national debt has long past. This is the death of the dollar as we know it. It doesnt matter what happens, from this point forward, the dollar will founder.
Not as long as there is a stable US
What currency is more stable?

The dollar is not a problem unless someone is stupid enough to try to print money to pay it.

In 2023 expenditures were about 33% over revenues
If we can shrink the rate of growth to 5% over revenues then economic growth will, over time, render the impact of the debt meaningless.
 
$7.3 TRILLION!!!

Congress and the President need to be held personally liable.

Why? The American people voted them into office. They didn't get there by themselves. The American people are the ones who need to be held liable and we will be when the house of cards come crashing down. We're already paying the price of inflation for our poor decisions.
 
What Congress should focus on is setting spending/tax levels at levels that reduce or eliminate the deficit.
The system is designed to require ever-increasing levels of debt just to continue.

And that's why politicians will always kick the can down the road and raise the so-called debt ceiling over and over again until the whole system finally collapses under its own weight.
 
$1 Million bonus to every congresscritter every year they pass a balanced budget. They would figure it out. Suddenly all that non-essential spending would vanish.

A little over a half-billion a year to balance the budget...
 

Forum List

Back
Top