Should Barr Recuse Himself from Mueller Probe?

[Toddsterpatriot]

Its not up to Mr. Barr, or any accused, to incriminate themselves.

If this is so important, the Democrat National Committee should buy and run ads with the information they already have. Maybe they can get the Liberal Media to run the ads for free?

It's up to Congress to get the truth. That is their job. That is what they are there for.

But you said that Congress already has the truth.

If they have the truth, its time for them to take action. Vote impeachment, Aye or Nay.

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

 

[BWK]

It's up to Congress to get the truth. That is their job. That is what they are there for.

But you said that Congress already has the truth.

If they have the truth, its time for them to take action. Vote impeachment, Aye or Nay.

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

You talk stupid silly shit. Impeach Trump now.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

But you said that Congress already has the truth.

If they have the truth, its time for them to take action. Vote impeachment, Aye or Nay.

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

You talk stupid silly shit. Impeach Trump now.

You're projecting.....again.

 

[BWK]

Bill Barr has a few previous employers who are connected to key subjects in the Mueller Report, and these facts didn't get much attention during Barr's confirmation hearing.

Should William Barr recuse himself from Mueller report? Legal experts say AG's ties to Russia are troubling

“The legal standard is really clear about these issues.

"'It’s not about actual conflict, it’s about the appearance of a conflict, about the appearance of bias,' Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University’s School of Law and an expert on judicial and government ethics, tells Newsweek . 'The problem is that we have so many flagrant conflicts that are so obvious, we get distracted from what the legal standard is.'

"This much is known: On Barr’s public financial disclosure report, he admits to working for a law firm that represented Russia’s Alfa Bank and for a company whose co-founders allegedly have long-standing business ties to Russia.

"What’s more, he received dividends from Vector Group, a holding company with deep financial ties to Russia."

Perhaps the House Judiciary Committee should hit Barr with another subpoena?

He's not investigating Russia, dumbass, he's investigating crimes linked to the Russia hoax, in other words, Democrats.

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

 

[BWK]

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

You talk stupid silly shit. Impeach Trump now.

You're projecting.....again.

And you haven't said shit for about twenty posts back. Impeach now. The Trump bs is over. David Jolly and John Heilemann are right. We have more than enough witnesses who testified under oath that points to Trumps obstruction. ttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=47QuTnI7WhQ

 

[BWK]

Funny? Not really! Time to impeach now.

 

[toomuchtime_]

Bill Barr has a few previous employers who are connected to key subjects in the Mueller Report, and these facts didn't get much attention during Barr's confirmation hearing.

Should William Barr recuse himself from Mueller report? Legal experts say AG's ties to Russia are troubling

“The legal standard is really clear about these issues.

"'It’s not about actual conflict, it’s about the appearance of a conflict, about the appearance of bias,' Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University’s School of Law and an expert on judicial and government ethics, tells Newsweek . 'The problem is that we have so many flagrant conflicts that are so obvious, we get distracted from what the legal standard is.'

"This much is known: On Barr’s public financial disclosure report, he admits to working for a law firm that represented Russia’s Alfa Bank and for a company whose co-founders allegedly have long-standing business ties to Russia.

"What’s more, he received dividends from Vector Group, a holding company with deep financial ties to Russia."

Perhaps the House Judiciary Committee should hit Barr with another subpoena?

He's not investigating Russia, dumbass, he's investigating crimes linked to the Russia hoax, in other words, Democrats.

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

So you are saying Obama is above the law?

 

[BWK]

Bill Barr has a few previous employers who are connected to key subjects in the Mueller Report, and these facts didn't get much attention during Barr's confirmation hearing.

Should William Barr recuse himself from Mueller report? Legal experts say AG's ties to Russia are troubling

“The legal standard is really clear about these issues.

"'It’s not about actual conflict, it’s about the appearance of a conflict, about the appearance of bias,' Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University’s School of Law and an expert on judicial and government ethics, tells Newsweek . 'The problem is that we have so many flagrant conflicts that are so obvious, we get distracted from what the legal standard is.'

"This much is known: On Barr’s public financial disclosure report, he admits to working for a law firm that represented Russia’s Alfa Bank and for a company whose co-founders allegedly have long-standing business ties to Russia.

"What’s more, he received dividends from Vector Group, a holding company with deep financial ties to Russia."

Perhaps the House Judiciary Committee should hit Barr with another subpoena?

He's not investigating Russia, dumbass, he's investigating crimes linked to the Russia hoax, in other words, Democrats.

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

So you are saying Obama is above the law?

You know what, stop asking stupid questions. You aren't insulting my intelligence, you're insulting your own. Do you have anything to debate concerning the thread? If not, you and I are done here.

 

[toomuchtime_]

He's not investigating Russia, dumbass, he's investigating crimes linked to the Russia hoax, in other words, Democrats.

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

So you are saying Obama is above the law?

You know what, stop asking stupid questions. You aren't insulting my intelligence, you're insulting your own. Do you have anything to debate concerning the thread? If not, you and I are done here.

lol How can I insult your intelligence since no sign of intelligence is to be found in your posts? If you had any intelligence you would know there is a serious criminal investigation going on led by the US Attorney for Connecticut into the origin of the Russia collusion hoax, the collusion between the Clinton campaign and the Obama Justice Department, and it is clear many people from the Clinton campaign, the Justice Department and the Obama WH will be questioned and some are likely to be charged. The evidence of corruption is overwhelming, but the question of criminality is yet to be determined. It is difficult to imagine that Obama won't be questioned under oath at some point.

 

[lantern2814]

But you said that Congress already has the truth.

If they have the truth, its time for them to take action. Vote impeachment, Aye or Nay.

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

You talk stupid silly shit. Impeach Trump now.

Well idiot, do it then. Go ahead and impeach Trump. When you fail, enjoy the landslide Trump win (which is likely coming anyway).

 

[BWK]

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

We'll, that is grounds for impeachment then. You can either testify and get caught lying, or you can obstruct by not testifying. It happened in Watergate, and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

It happened in Watergate,

Watergate? Wasn't that where someone connected to the government spied
on an opposing party's presidential campaign?

and they got rid of the miserable piece of shit.

Can't get rid of Obama, he's already out of office.

You talk stupid silly shit. Impeach Trump now.

Well idiot, do it then. Go ahead and impeach Trump. When you fail, enjoy the landslide Trump win (which is likely coming anyway).

Another Trump, and the Republic that you know about will be over, and so will your freedoms and your securities. Knock yourself out.

And when they finally have enough eggs in the basket, Democrats will impeach. And the ones who vote no were traitors to their country anyway, and we'll know who they all are.

 

[BWK]

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

So you are saying Obama is above the law?

You know what, stop asking stupid questions. You aren't insulting my intelligence, you're insulting your own. Do you have anything to debate concerning the thread? If not, you and I are done here.

lol How can I insult your intelligence since no sign of intelligence is to be found in your posts? If you had any intelligence you would know there is a serious criminal investigation going on led by the US Attorney for Connecticut into the origin of the Russia collusion hoax, the collusion between the Clinton campaign and the Obama Justice Department, and it is clear many people from the Clinton campaign, the Justice Department and the Obama WH will be questioned and some are likely to be charged. The evidence of corruption is overwhelming, but the question of criminality is yet to be determined. It is difficult to imagine that Obama won't be questioned under oath at some point.

LOl! ReallY? What evidence is that? The evidence the fairy told you about? You folks are so corrupt and pathetic.

 

[BWK]

Bill Barr has a few previous employers who are connected to key subjects in the Mueller Report, and these facts didn't get much attention during Barr's confirmation hearing.

Should William Barr recuse himself from Mueller report? Legal experts say AG's ties to Russia are troubling

“The legal standard is really clear about these issues.

"'It’s not about actual conflict, it’s about the appearance of a conflict, about the appearance of bias,' Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University’s School of Law and an expert on judicial and government ethics, tells Newsweek . 'The problem is that we have so many flagrant conflicts that are so obvious, we get distracted from what the legal standard is.'

"This much is known: On Barr’s public financial disclosure report, he admits to working for a law firm that represented Russia’s Alfa Bank and for a company whose co-founders allegedly have long-standing business ties to Russia.

"What’s more, he received dividends from Vector Group, a holding company with deep financial ties to Russia."

Perhaps the House Judiciary Committee should hit Barr with another subpoena?

He's not investigating Russia, dumbass, he's investigating crimes linked to the Russia hoax, in other words, Democrats.

It has never been proven by anyone on the Right that there is a Russian hoax. They're all lies and there exists no evidence based information proving that. Stop lying.

Well, if that's true, Barr won't find anything but we both know he will find find Obama officials conspired with the Clinton campaign to invent the collusion nonsense and now the question is how much of what they did is criminal and how much of it is just corrupt but not criminal. By the time the FBI starts interrogating Obama under oath, we will know.

Lol! Not in a thousand lifetimes. You believe in fairy dust and Republican lies. So sad.

So you are saying Obama is above the law?

If the Right had something on Obama they would have come up with something when he was president. They didn't so they won't, because they can't. This is even more ridiculous than Benghazi. They grab something out of thin air, and magically Republicans have a scandal. When does this party stop acting the fool?

 

[mudwhistle]

Bill Barr has a few previous employers who are connected to key subjects in the Mueller Report, and these facts didn't get much attention during Barr's confirmation hearing.

Should William Barr recuse himself from Mueller report? Legal experts say AG's ties to Russia are troubling

“The legal standard is really clear about these issues.

"'It’s not about actual conflict, it’s about the appearance of a conflict, about the appearance of bias,' Jed Shugerman, a professor at Fordham University’s School of Law and an expert on judicial and government ethics, tells Newsweek . 'The problem is that we have so many flagrant conflicts that are so obvious, we get distracted from what the legal standard is.'

"This much is known: On Barr’s public financial disclosure report, he admits to working for a law firm that represented Russia’s Alfa Bank and for a company whose co-founders allegedly have long-standing business ties to Russia.

"What’s more, he received dividends from Vector Group, a holding company with deep financial ties to Russia."

Perhaps the House Judiciary Committee should hit Barr with another subpoena?

I think anyone who has ever seen Doctor Zhivago should recuse themselves.

 

[Polishprince]

Funny? Not really! Time to impeach now.

If its "time to impeach now", then put it up for a vote now. No need for any testimony as you have already made up your mind. The witness has rights, in fact he shouldn't be permitted to testify

 

[Polishprince]

Nadler should be recusing himself from anything dealing with Trump. The two have a history, Nadler tried to obstruct Trump's tremendous redevelopment plans and still has a chip on his shoulder

 

[hadit]

There is no reason whatsoever to do that.

Of course there is. He has proven himself untrustworthy and biased.

"Untrustworthy" and "biased" is worthy of prosecution? Do you really want to go down that road? If so, I'd like to add one, "Extremely careless".

No. Actions are. Barr has acted on his biases and proven himself to be untrustworthy.

And if you wanna talk about extremely careless let's not forget tRump letting classified info out to the Russians right there in the White House.

You're kind of all over the place. Name a few of Barr's actions that are worthy of prosecution. And yes, "extremely careless" applies to actions.

/www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-10/attorney-general-william-barr-used-pardons-to-protect-president

Barr covered up Iran Contra with pardons because investigators were closing in on Bush. That is criminal.

Barr could not pardon anyone as he was not president. But you knew that.

 

[hadit]

That's collusion to help a foreign country get your candidate elected.

Post the portion of the anti-collusion statute that mentions polling data.

The Act and Commission regulations include a broad prohibition on foreign national activity in connection with elections in the United States. 52 U.S.C. § 30121 and generally, 11 CFR 110.20. In general, foreign nationals are prohibited from the following activities:

• Making any contribution or donation of money or other thing of value, or making any expenditure, independent expenditure, or disbursement in connection with any federal, state or local election in the United States;

Thanks.
No mention of collusion or polling data.

Thing of value is the same thing. Get a clue.

Manafort gave a thing of value to his Russian buddy.....bad Manafort.

So you won't post the anti-collusion statute?

Because I don't post silly shit. I left that for you.

Sounds a lot like you just said the actual law is silly shit, which means what, that your feelz are more important?

 

[hadit]

Tax payers need to know the truth about officials who hold an office dedicated to working for us, not themselves.

And if applicable and necessary, Democrats will be forced to tell Barr just that. We can't have criminals working for us.

Its not up to Mr. Barr, or any accused, to incriminate themselves.

If this is so important, the Democrat National Committee should buy and run ads with the information they already have. Maybe they can get the Liberal Media to run the ads for free?

It's up to Congress to get the truth. That is their job. That is what they are there for.

But you said that Congress already has the truth.

If they have the truth, its time for them to take action. Vote impeachment, Aye or Nay.

They do. All they're doing is going through the motions of checking the I's and dotting all the T's.

If they need Mr. Barr's help, they don't have everything. And since he is one of the accused, he is under no obligation to cooperate with his persecutors.

And meanwhile, he goes about doing his job, ferreting out the corruption at the source of the Muller investigation.

 

[Crepitus]

Of course there is. He has proven himself untrustworthy and biased.

"Untrustworthy" and "biased" is worthy of prosecution? Do you really want to go down that road? If so, I'd like to add one, "Extremely careless".

No. Actions are. Barr has acted on his biases and proven himself to be untrustworthy.

And if you wanna talk about extremely careless let's not forget tRump letting classified info out to the Russians right there in the White House.

You're kind of all over the place. Name a few of Barr's actions that are worthy of prosecution. And yes, "extremely careless" applies to actions.

/www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-01-10/attorney-general-william-barr-used-pardons-to-protect-president

Barr covered up Iran Contra with pardons because investigators were closing in on Bush. That is criminal.

Barr could not pardon anyone as he was not president. But you knew that.

Don't be deliberately obtuse.