Sens. Harris, Warren and Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding Supreme Court

[jc456]

Clearly, democrats want to live in some country other than the USA

so why are they still here? it's very obvious they hate our country. why else do they wish to change every fking piece of it?

Electoral college
1st amendment
2nd amendment
14th amendment
now the supreme court. it seems logical to me that they don't like the USA. Why are we coddling that fact. Let's start calling them traitors for which it is obvious they are?

Anyone?

 

[Papageorgio]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

The republicans. Top to bottom. They are cheaters and exploiters and the democrats should pull all the stops. Then, once the white men are crying like little bitches, maybe we can finally have a discussion of our messed up system. You can believe it wont happen until then.

So you prefer Democratic Party cheaters rather than Republican cheaters.

You cry like a little bitch because you aren’t in power. This is such moronic partisan reasoning.

 

[The Original Tree]

They want to expand the Supreme Court to 15 and will only attempt this the next time a Dem President is in Office so they can add 6 Liberal SCOTUS in one Presidential Term.

People better wake up to what these people are trying to attempt every day. They are never going to stop trying to change all of our laws, traditions, rights, and privileges.

BTW, NOT BUILDING A WALL IS IMMORAL.

Even The Bible says That God has established borders for all peoples.

 

[Tehon]

Clearly, democrats want to live in some country other than the USA

so why are they still here? it's very obvious they hate our country. why else do they wish to change every fking piece of it?

Electoral college
1st amendment
2nd amendment
14th amendment
now the supreme court. it seems logical to me that they don't like the USA. Why are we coddling that fact. Let's start calling them traitors for which it is obvious they are?

Anyone?

Start?

 

[Tehon]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

 

[Claudette]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

Hope they realize that this could bite them in the ass like the nuclear option did.

They sure aren't able to think outside their little box. Sheeple one and all.

 

[Fueri]

The Supreme Tantrum continues.

following this logic, the Supreme Court will eventually have more members than Congress, as the incoming administration just backfills the court to suit itself.

what an utterly horrible idea.

 

[Auld Phart]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.

 

[candycorn]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

If they become the president, declare a national emergency and expand the court. Easy.

I agree that it’s a ridiculous idea but the ridiculous is now the norm in Trump’s America. We currently have a President who thinks he can rape someone and then pardon himself.

Not the same thing.

Really? What is more ridiculous than a President who thinks he can pardon himself for murdering you?

 

[Mac1958]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

It's a given. If they can, they'll do it.
.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

If they become the president, declare a national emergency and expand the court. Easy.

I agree that it’s a ridiculous idea but the ridiculous is now the norm in Trump’s America. We currently have a President who thinks he can rape someone and then pardon himself.

Not the same thing.

Really? What is more ridiculous than a President who thinks he can pardon himself for murdering you?

He never said that.

 

[Tehon]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.

It would seem that the Democrats have no case.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...7841be-dbdf-11e5-81ae-7491b9b9e7df_story.html

Roberts was not alone in being denied a hearing or a vote by Biden. According to a report by the Congressional Research Service (CRS), in 1992 Biden killed the nominations of 32 Bush appointees to the federal bench without giving them so much as a hearing. And that does not count an additional 20 nominations for the federal bench where Biden did not hold hearings that year, which CRS excluded from its count because they reached the Senate “within approximately [four] months before it adjourned.”

 

[Stormy Daniels]

They should wait, til they have a chance of getting what they want.

That's what they're getting at, though. Republicans have repeatedly been successful by putting the Supreme Court on the ballot as a way to energize their voters. The Democrats are trying to replicate that for themselves. The message here is "vote for a Democratic White House and Senate in 2020 and you'll have a liberal court as well."

 

[sakinago]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

This is the equivalent kids on the playground making up new rules when they’re loosing and are being sore loosers. Except it’s not kids, it’s adults running for president, so it’s pathetic. And it’s also not just a playground game, its one of the three branches of government they wish to add new judges and force their agenda on the entire nation.

 

[candycorn]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

If they become the president, declare a national emergency and expand the court. Easy.

I agree that it’s a ridiculous idea but the ridiculous is now the norm in Trump’s America. We currently have a President who thinks he can rape someone and then pardon himself.

Not the same thing.

Really? What is more ridiculous than a President who thinks he can pardon himself for murdering you?

He never said that.

 

[jc456]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

And? Doesn't the senate own then the justices to the SC? so how is it they believe they can just add SCOTUS's? Don't these stupid fks know the constitution yet? is this really who we need in a position as president, someone unknowing of the country's constitution? I"m just saying, where do these traitors come from?

 

[jc456]

Anyone surprised by this? You can't win, just change the rules.


Americans can see this, if you vote for this, you can't say you weren't forewarned...

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/03/18/2020-democrats-supreme-court-12236254


After watching Mitch McConnell transform the judiciary over the past four years, liberals are demanding a bold response. And Democrats are listening.

Sens. Kamala Harris, Elizabeth Warren and Kirsten Gillibrand told POLITICO they would not rule out expanding the Supreme Court if elected president, showcasing a new level of interest in the Democratic field on an issue that has until recently remained on the fringes of debate.

The surprising openness from White House hopefuls along with other prominent Senate Democrats to making sweeping changes — from adding seats to the high court to imposing term limits on judges and more — comes as the party is eager to chip away at the GOP’s growing advantage in the courts.

“We are on the verge of a crisis of confidence in the Supreme Court,” said Harris (D-Calif.). “We have to take this challenge head on, and everything is on the table to do that.”

It's a given. If they can, they'll do it.
.

tell us how?

 

[Tehon]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

And? Doesn't the senate own then the justices to the SC? so how is it they believe they can just add SCOTUS's? Don't these stupid fks know the constitution yet? is this really who we need in a position as president, someone unknowing of the country's constitution? I"m just saying, where do these traitors come from?

I said they dont have a legitimate gripe.

Tell me, how does the Constitution limit the quantity of judges?

 

[Stormy Daniels]

Anyone surprised by this?

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

And? Doesn't the senate own then the justices to the SC? so how is it they believe they can just add SCOTUS's? Don't these stupid fks know the constitution yet? is this really who we need in a position as president, someone unknowing of the country's constitution? I"m just saying, where do these traitors come from?

The constitution says that Congress cannot increase the nine justice limit? I was not aware of that. Please let us know the article, section, and clause.

 

[jc456]

Not at all. It's smart political strategy to combat cheaters.

who cheated?

/-----/ "who cheated?"
Anyone who beats a democRAT is a cheater.

This is the complaint. Do they have a legitimate gripe?

Three Democratic presidential candidates are saying they're willing to consider adding justices to the Supreme Court as a response to the Senate GOP's refusal to consider former President Obama's last pick for the court.
Warren, Harris, Gillibrand back efforts to add justices to Supreme Court

And? Doesn't the senate own then the justices to the SC? so how is it they believe they can just add SCOTUS's? Don't these stupid fks know the constitution yet? is this really who we need in a position as president, someone unknowing of the country's constitution? I"m just saying, where do these traitors come from?

I said they dont have a legitimate gripe.

Tell me, how does the Constitution limit the quantity of judges?

so tell me. you think a president can just make up the count? then why wouldn't trump just do that? I'm puzzled by some in here.