Senate Republicans block "Buffett Rule", which would have put a 30% income tax on mil

Discussion in 'Politics' started by nitroz, Apr 17, 2012.

  1. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    (Reuters) - Senate Republicans on Monday blocked President Barack Obama's "Buffett Rule" legislation, which would have put a 30-percent minimum tax on millionaires, in a debate that is likely to resonate through the November general election.

    Democrats, as expected, failed to garner the 60 votes needed in the 100-member Senate to move to a full debate and vote on the bill aimed at getting more tax revenues out of the wealthy.

    Obama and congressional Republicans are squaring off this week over the tax hikes for millionaires and a Republican plan to give new tax cuts for businesses.

    "Tonight, Senate Republicans voted to block the Buffett Rule, choosing once again to protect tax breaks for the wealthiest few Americans at the expense of the middle class," Obama said in a statement.

    Though scant changes to tax policy are expected ahead of the November 6 election, the skirmishes are giving voters a preview of debates they will hear over the next seven months.

    Obama and his fellow Democrats argue that raising taxes on the rich will help reduce deficits and bring more fairness to the tax code. Republicans are pushing a much different narrative of tax cuts - even if they add to deficits - as a way of creating jobs.

    As Americans scurried to file tax returns by Tuesday, the Senate debated the Buffett Rule, which would require households earning more than $1 million to pay at least a 30-percent tax rate.

    Central to Obama's "tax fairness" re-election campaign theme, the rule is named after billionaire Warren Buffett, who supports it and famously complains that he pays a lower effective tax rate than his secretary. Republicans argued that raising taxes would hurt the fragile economy.

    Fifty-one senators voted for the bill, while 45 senators voted no, effectively killing it. Republican Senator Susan Collins voted for the tax hike, while Democratic Senator Mark Pryor voted against it.

    A series of pivotal decisions on tax policy are looming at the year-end, when lower tax rates for all individuals - enacted under former President George W. Bush - are set to expire. These include estate, capital gains and dividend tax rates.

    Economists worry that partisan wrangling after the presidential and congressional elections could stall action on those decisions and several other measures, hobbling the economic recovery.

    "Politicians' time would be better spent working on an overhaul of the tax system that could actually pass rather than reforms that are likely to go nowhere," said Maya MacGuineas, president of the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Budget.

    CLASS WARFARE?

    Republicans say the Buffett measure will do nothing to solve the larger problem of deficits and unemployment.

    "We have a president that seems more interested in pitting people against each other than he is in doing anything," said Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell.

    He was hitting on a Republican theme that raising taxes on the rich was tantamount to class warfare.

    On Thursday Republicans - in firm control the House of Representatives - are expected to debate and likely approve a bill to give a one-year, 20-percent tax deduction on business income to owners of businesses with fewer than 500 employees.

    Republicans are portraying that tax cut as one for "small businesses," a group they say the Buffett Rule will harm.

    Democrats say the legislation will add to already huge budget deficits, since Republicans do not include any measures to offset the $46 billion revenue loss. And they cite studies showing that the tax cut will mainly go to those with incomes over $200,000 a year.

    That measure is not likely to make it through the Senate.

    BATTLE ESCALATING

    The battle over taxes has been escalating for weeks with the White House speaking nearly daily about the Buffett Rule.

    The Obama campaign played offense last week by releasing the president's tax returns several days before the deadline, to put pressure on Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney.

    Obama and his wife paid about 20.5 percent of their income in taxes in 2011, compared to an estimated 15.4 percent rate paid by the Romney's.

    Romney, however, has asked for an extension to file his taxes.

    A Gallup poll out on Monday said that Americans are split fairly evenly between those who say their federal tax bill is fair and those who say they pay too much.

    But when asked specifically about how the wealthy are taxed, about 60 percent back some kind of Buffett Rule, Gallup's surveys have found.

    "It is a robust finding across whichever polls that ask, you usually get 60 percent plus that say, 'yes, higher income are paying too little,'" Frank Newport, editor in chief of Gallup polling, said.

    The polling, telephone interviews with about 1,000 adults, has a margin of error of 4 percentage points.

    Buffett rule fails Senate vote in tax fight | Reuters
     
  2. LordBrownTrout
    Offline

    LordBrownTrout Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    15,492
    Thanks Received:
    2,962
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    South Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,353
    More taxation is not the solution to the mess that we're in.
     
  3. nitroz
    Offline

    nitroz INDEPENDENTly ruthless

    Joined:
    May 18, 2011
    Messages:
    3,421
    Thanks Received:
    445
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    Merritt Island, FL
    Ratings:
    +457
    So we should let the millionaires/billionares and high class have continued tax breaks?
     
  4. BreezeWood
    Offline

    BreezeWood VIP Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,674
    Thanks Received:
    293
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +475
    Lowering one's own tax while continuing to spend is the reason we are in the mess we are in - paying the fair share owed by everyone will solve the problem.
     
  5. Claudette
    Offline

    Claudette Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 3, 2009
    Messages:
    19,603
    Thanks Received:
    3,020
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +7,668
    Your so right.

    The Clowns have got to cut spending.

    The more money they get, the more they spend. Cut the damned spending.
     
  6. Dick Tuck
    Offline

    Dick Tuck Board Troll

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,511
    Thanks Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +502
    You're correct. However a fairer taxation method is a good first step.
     
  7. LordBrownTrout
    Offline

    LordBrownTrout Gold Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    15,492
    Thanks Received:
    2,962
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    South Texas
    Ratings:
    +6,353
    Even if tax rates went up to 39 percent for the top bracket, the monies received over a 10 year period is approx 47, 48 billion. Our interest is averaging 30-50B a month with a high last December of 98B, Government - Interest Expense on the Debt Outstanding.

    The class envy has been around since the beginning. We need to be discussing how we're really going to solve our debt, unemployment, bad economy....not some trivial class envy notion that O continually throws around.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. Kevin_Kennedy
    Offline

    Kevin_Kennedy Defend Liberty

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2008
    Messages:
    17,590
    Thanks Received:
    1,581
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Ohio
    Ratings:
    +2,027
    You do realize it's their money, right?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. blastoff
    Offline

    blastoff Undocumented Reg. User

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2009
    Messages:
    13,505
    Thanks Received:
    1,707
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    In a galaxy far far away...
    Ratings:
    +4,599
    Everyone knows that including Barry and the other members on his cabal in D.C., but they know millions of their base will be turned on by the class warfare aspect of it. Kinda silly since it's just more preaching to their choir, but they're hoping to at least keep their dumb voters in line.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. RDD_1210
    Offline

    RDD_1210 Forms his own opinions

    Joined:
    May 13, 2010
    Messages:
    14,642
    Thanks Received:
    1,295
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Ratings:
    +2,001
    No it's not. But increased revenues (taxes) combined with spending cuts is the solution. Taxing those who have been receiving the biggest breaks for years now is just one step in the right direction.
     

Share This Page