Senate has uncovered no direct evidence of conspiracy between Trump campaign and Russia

[The Purge]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

 

[Lesh]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

 

[The Original Tree]

LIES!

I knows it.

Putin told me its so.

 

[JGalt]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

When did we start convicting people on "circumstantial evidence", dolt? I just heard that Mueller might not even release his findings.

Please turn out the lights and lock the door when you leave. The party's over.

 

[BlackFlag]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

 

[g5000]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

The REPUBLICAN Senate has found no collusion between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, despite coverage of that fact being all over the news for some time!

Gee, there's a surprise...

 

[Pete7469]

I'm shocked....

 

[Intolerant]

Something we knew all along.

 

[JGalt]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

 

[JGalt]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

The REPUBLICAN Senate has found no collusion between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, despite coverage of that fact being all over the news for some time!

Gee, there's a surprise...

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

 

[bendog]

There's no note from Trump to Vlad.

And Trump gave Manafort the polling data used by the Russians to send bot messages to targeted geographical areas, and Assange gave

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

The REPUBLICAN Senate has found no collusion between members of the Trump campaign and Russia, despite coverage of that fact being all over the news for some time!

Gee, there's a surprise...

and Trump gave Manafort the polling date used by the former KGB to target specific voting areas with bot messages, and Assange gave Stone emails Trump referenced in speeches before they were released to the media.

But there is apparently no love note from Vlad to Don.

LOL

 

[Lesh]

To start with we know that the e-mails released by wikileaks were stolen by Russian Intel (GRU...Military Intel)

We now know that there was collusion between wikileaks and the Trump campaign that goes as far as Steve Bannon and "someone" above him in the campaign .That leaves only a few people

We know that Trump was in negotiations with the Russian government to get the biggest deal of his life done (Trump Moscow Tower...300 million) all the way through the 2016 election campaign

We know that Putin (as stated in the Helsinki Conference) admits that he favored Trump

We know that virtually everyone in the Trump campaign had meetings with high ranking Russians and lied about them to the public and Federal investigators

We know that the RNC Convention platform was changed from being pro-Ukraine to being Pro-Russia

We know that there was a meeting in the Trump Tower in which opposition research on Clinton was offered

We know that Trump crafted a statement lying about that meeting

We know that Trump has not initiated sanctions against Russia that were enacted into law by Congress after the Skripal poisoning

We know that Trump never said a word about the Russian mercenary attack on our forces in Syria

We know that Trump just eased sanctions on the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska

We know that Trump has made a number of very puzzling statements that sound like Russian propaganda (Montenegrans being warlike people...the Soviet incursion in Afghanistan being caused by terrorism)

What we don't know (or can't yet prove)

Where those bizarre statements came from (virtually no one in Trump's cabinet would have fed him that)

Why those actions regarding sanctions occurred

Why the Platform was changed at the RNC Convention and by whom

Which upper campaign official (above Bannon) was colluding with Stone and wikileaks

DId Stone or the campaign officials know that the wikileaks stuff came from Russians

DId Assange and Wikileaks know that

Were leaked e-mails discussed at the Trump Tower meeting?

 

[OldLady]

Oh Noooos.....not what the ABNORMALS want to hear!

After two years and 200 interviews, the Senate Intelligence Committee is approaching the end of its investigation into the 2016 election, having uncovered no direct evidence of a conspiracy between the Trump campaign and Russia, according to both Democrats and Republicans on the committee.

Senate: No direct proof of conspiracy between Trump campaign, Russia

What a waste of time. Damn their egos. They should have trusted Mueller to do it.

 

[JGalt]

To start with we know that the e-mails released by wikileaks were stolen by Russian Intel (GRU...Military Intel)

We now know that there was collusion between wikileaks and the Trump campaign that goes as far as Steve Bannon and "someone" above him in the campaign .That leaves only a few people

We know that Trump was in negotiations with the Russian government to get the biggest deal of his life done (Trump Moscow Tower...300 million) all the way through the 2016 election campaign

We know that Putin (as stated in the Helsinki Conference) admits that he favored Trump

We know that virtually everyone in the Trump campaign had meetings with high ranking Russians and lied about them to the public and Federal investigators

We know that the RNC Convention platform was changed from being pro-Ukraine to being Pro-Russia

We know that there was a meeting in the Trump Tower in which opposition research on Clinton was offered

We know that Trump crafted a statement lying about that meeting

We know that Trump has not initiated sanctions against Russia that were enacted into law by Congress after the Skripal poisoning

We know that Trump never said a word about the Russian mercenary attack on our forces in Syria

We know that Trump just eased sanctions on the Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska

We know that Trump has made a number of very puzzling statements that sound like Russian propaganda (Montenegrans being warlike people...the Soviet incursion in Afghanistan being caused by terrorism)

What we don't know (or can't yet prove)

Where those bizarre statements came from (virtually no one in Trump's cabinet would have fed him that)

Why those actions regarding sanctions occurred

Why the Platform was changed at the RNC Convention and by whom

Which upper campaign official (above Bannon) was colluding with Stone and wikileaks

DId Stone or the campaign officials know that the wikileaks stuff came from Russians

DId Assange and Wikileaks know that

Were leaked e-mails discussed at the Trump Tower meeting?

 

[BlackFlag]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

 

[OldLady]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

 

[bendog]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The Russia Trump connection is there for anyone who doesn't want to ignore it. Politically Trump has probably succeeded in inoculating himself from any YuuuGE loss of his base ... although I always doubted any would care that he's owned by Russia and gave Russia the polling data they used for their illegal social media campaign.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

But then they weren't privy to all the information available (Manafort giving internal RNC polling data to a Russian agent for instance) and left the question of collusion open ended.

"No DIRECT proof"...but plenty of circumstantial evidence

Circumstantial evidence is not enough to convict.

 

[BlackFlag]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The legislature is supposed to have oversight over the executive. We have an independent investigation going on, the Senate just concluded a total sham, and the House will finally do its duty after abandoning it for Trump’s first 2 years.

 

[The Original Tree]

The GOP led Senate investigation has never tried to look for any evidence of conspiracy. It’s only purpose has been to rescue Trump from his own incimpetence.

"....doing the same thing over and over, while expecting a different result."

Like 8 Benghazi investigations. We’re just starting our 1st.

Just because the GOP were morons, must we be too?

The Russia Trump connection is there for anyone who doesn't want to ignore it. Politically Trump has probably succeeded in inoculating himself from any YuuuGE loss of his base ... although I always doubted any would care that he's owned by Russia and gave Russia the polling data they used for their illegal social media campaign.

So you are saying 7 Investigations done by Bipartisan Groups in Congress and the Senate were all Ignoring Russian Collusion when they said Zero Evidence of Russian Collusion?

The Senate Intelligence Committee which is bipartisan and has access to classified intel that Moscow Mueller does not, also said, NO COLLUSION.

Some people should take their heads out of Clinton's Stanky Vagina.