Sen.-elect Brown demands to be seated

the dems will play games and then look up their asses for their lost seats, come NOV.
 
Round of applause for the Dems for acquiescing to Brown's request to be seated early?
 
The answer is "Deliberatly frustrate the will of the voter and try to ram asinine legislation through as quickly as they can before the voters are aware of what they are up to."

So what is the question?
 
It appears the Dems have to many votes upcoming between now and the 11th, he wants his seat.

Will the Dems give it to him or play games?

Stay tuned...

Sen.-elect Brown demands to be seated - Washington Times

I'll take "Political Games" for $200, Alex.

The answer is:

This Internet poster didn't bother to read the article in the OP or everyone's response before replying.

Oh brother. The purpose of this thread is so simple to understand, yet you're totally lost. Drink some more coffee.
 
A link in case there was not one already...

Scott Brown to be sworn in as Massachusetts senator Thursday - TheHill.com

Sen.-elect Scott Brown (R), the successor to the late Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.), will be sworn in to office Thursday afternoon, giving Republicans 41 seats in the upper chamber.

"Once we get his certificate, we expect to swear him in tomorrow afternoon as early as 5 o'clock, which is earlier than he suggested," said Jim Manley, spokesman for Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), in an interview Wednesday.

(Hat tip to Hot Air for the linky)
 

Forum List

Back
Top