Keep in mind this was back in 09:
and?
And the function of our military is national defense, not preemptive global offense. The US Armed Forces are to protect US citizens, not bankrupt them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Keep in mind this was back in 09:
and?
I'm glad the "Super Committee" failed. Now at least we'll see some cuts. It's not nearly enough but at least they're beginning to cut.
Obama says he will veto any attempt to stop the cuts.
All of this mess makes it quite clear to me that Obama STILL puts ideology above the best interest of our country. It also makes me feel that NOTHING will change as long as he remains in office.
We do need to transform our military to deal with the threats we face in this new global age and there may be room for cuts in that transformation. BUT just blindly cutting military budgets without forethought is foolish.
I'm glad the "Super Committee" failed. Now at least we'll see some cuts. It's not nearly enough but at least they're beginning to cut.
never happen, and they all know it.
Keep in mind this was back in 09:
Keep in mind this was back in 09:
Whoever doesn't want defense cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining defense spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination.
Whoever doesn't want defense cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining defense spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination.
And we are the most threatened country next to Israel. Especially since Obama took office.
I'm actually ok with these cuts. I'll take any cuts i can get at this point. But it is interesting one of his own lackeys is opposing him this way. Stay tuned i guess.
So you support cutting defense in order to fund Obamacare? 1 trillion out of one put right into another. It's just a game. A game at the expense of our safety.
True...and high time that the Countries we are helping defend step thier spending a bit...Keep in mind this was back in 09:
Whoever doesn't want defense cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining defense spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination.
Whoever doesn't want medicare, medicaid or SSI cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining this entitlements spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination
I'm actually ok with these cuts. I'll take any cuts i can get at this point. But it is interesting one of his own lackeys is opposing him this way. Stay tuned i guess.
So you support cutting defense in order to fund Obamacare? 1 trillion out of one put right into another. It's just a game. A game at the expense of our safety.
Whoever doesn't want defense cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining defense spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination.
Whoever doesn't want medicare, medicaid or SSI cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining this entitlements spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination
Social Security is paying for itself. Get your facts straight before you try to be a smartass.
Medicare needs a combination of higher payroll taxes and less benefits to bring it into line actuarily.
Medicaid we can pay for by putting the top tax rate back and using the savings we get from cutting defense.
I'm actually ok with these cuts. I'll take any cuts i can get at this point. But it is interesting one of his own lackeys is opposing him this way. Stay tuned i guess.
So you support cutting defense in order to fund Obamacare? 1 trillion out of one put right into another. It's just a game. A game at the expense of our safety.
We spend much more than any other country spends. You're "either/or" stance is bullshit.
Whoever doesn't want defense cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining defense spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination.
Whoever doesn't want medicare, medicaid or SSI cuts should tell us how we should pay for maintaining this entitlements spending at the current levels, or even increasing it.
Increase revenue? or increase borrowing? or cut something else...
which is it? Those are the choices, in any combination
Social Security is paying for itself. Get your facts straight before you try to be a smartass.
Medicare needs a combination of higher payroll taxes and less benefits to bring it into line actuarily.
Medicaid we can pay for by putting the top tax rate back and using the savings we get from cutting defense.
So you support cutting defense in order to fund Obamacare? 1 trillion out of one put right into another. It's just a game. A game at the expense of our safety.
We spend much more than any other country spends. You're "either/or" stance is bullshit.
I never said either/or. I said cut frivolous spending first THEN plan the cuts to necessary items.
Nice projection attempt though.