Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Every major University has Black Study centers, I forget the specific name, they include dorms and include efforts by the black students to discourage any non blacks from using them. Been a fact for quite some time now. You can easily discover this for your self by researching it. But of course you won't because you don't care. It says loads about your knowledge that your not aware of this.
The only segregation occurring in the US now is on College Campuses by Blacks demanding segregated living and studying arrangements.
Every major University has Black Study centers, I forget the specific name, they include dorms and include efforts by the black students to discourage any non blacks from using them. Been a fact for quite some time now. You can easily discover this for your self by researching it. But of course you won't because you don't care. It says loads about your knowledge that your not aware of this.
Thats nice. However you stated:
Meaning there are no other types of segregation in this country.
Now...would you like that to retract that...take my deal...or just continue saying blatant falsehoods?
Segregation is illegal in the form YOU have argued here, that of race
It does not occur in any meaningful way in the US, or rather when it does, it is always brought out and a court decides the issue.
EXCEPT when minorities are the instigators of segregation.
The only segregation occurring in the US now is on College Campuses by Blacks demanding segregated living and studying arrangements.
But of course, I on the other hand, am as he has insinuated, a liar?
No, actually its not.
As I stated before...go to NYC...take the F train up...wait...actually not the F train, the 1 train. Its been a while. Anyway...prime example of segregation.
Or do you think that blacks all living in 1 area and whites all living in another area is NOT segregation?
So you went from it not occuring at all...to not occurring in a "meaningful way". At least you've started to qualify your absurd statements.
No...actually thats usually the only time nowadays that courts rule against it.
An obvious, and easy, counter-example to your lie.
http://www2.saintmarys.edu/
But of course, I on the other hand, am as he has insinuated, a liar?
If you are claiming that I am an inexpert layman in matters of the middle east and your opinion is just as valid as mine, then if you are NOT a liar, you certainly ARE mistaken.
again... would my opinion of marine corps procedures, policies, history and customs be just as valid as yours?
Segregation exists. It will be found in any major city. The issue is whether or not school placements should take into account race. SCOTUS said no.
Now, how many think school choice, where parents could influence school placements might be a more fair option? Since our congresspeople do not need to worry about immigration for the next 18 months or so, this might give them something meaningful to do?
So I guess this means only 4 of the Conservative Justices on the Supreme Court are racists?
I haven't read your article, but I'll take a stab at who the swing vote is. Kennedy. And he is not conservative, he is moderate...although he does tend to go conservative more often than not.
Were there any decisions this time around that weren't the 4 liberals vs. the 4 conservatives with Kennedy deciding who wins?
I haven't read your article, but I'll take a stab at who the swing vote is. Kennedy. And he is not conservative, he is moderate...although he does tend to go conservative more often than not.
Were there any decisions this time around that weren't the 4 liberals vs. the 4 conservatives with Kennedy deciding who wins?
Ahh so you ADMIT that when the 5 votes are for what YOU believe all is well even though it was 5-4? But when it is 5-4 against your belief then it is because of those damn racist, ignorant conservatives?
I doubt it, though that's not unusual on the SCOTUS, especially when in process of change. Mind you, if there are no more appointment possibilities and a Democrat wins in 2008, you will be very glad of the narrowness.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Please, tell me exactly what part of my post you got that deluded crap you just posted from.
Not really...the next one to die/retire will probably be...what Stevens? I know the liberal ones are right now much older than the conservatives.
I mean, sure, I'd rather it be narrow than it be all Scalia clones, but at the same time it worries me that every single case seems like its basically coming down to Kennedy...
posted by Retired
Read the thread if you can, I realize you liberals don't actually read whats written, being able to read between the lines and surmise what was REALLY meant but not written.
I read the thread. This should be fucking obvious considering I've been posting in the thread all along. What, do you think my posts have relevance just by accident? Do you think I randomly quote people and respond to them without reading them?
You "surmised" something from my post which was obviously not there. You got from a simple factual statement about Kennedy and a question about whether there had been any court cases in a particular vein to an absurd statement about your asinine preconceived beliefs about me.
Yes, I am a liberal. However, unlike yourself, I am not a partisan hack. My political beliefs do not mean that I can't "read between the lines". My political beliefs do not mean I can't appreciate someone elses point of view. My political beliefs do not mean I am uneducated, or stupid. Nor, obviously enough but somehow I need to point this out to some of these amazingly intelligent members, does it mean that my head is pointy.
Now, your arrogance would work much better if you were less incoherent. So, I ask again, how the fuck did you get from what I ACTUALLY said (you can quote me...in fact please do) to what you THOUGHT I said (which I specifically said I don't believe)