Scientific dissent from darwinism

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by Freeman, Apr 2, 2010.

  1. Freeman
    Offline

    Freeman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +401
  2. rdean
    Online

    rdean Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Quote from your article:

    "We know intuitively that Darwinism can accomplish some things, but not others. The question is what is that boundary? Does the information content in living things exceed that boundary? Darwinists have never faced those questions. They've never asked scientifically, can random mutation and natural selection generate the information content in living things."


    -----------------------------

    Didn't Darwin die in 1882? I wonder what we've learned since then?

    Intuitively?

    intuitive:
    instinctive, spontaneous, innate, involuntary, instinctual, untaught, unreflecting

    Untaught and unreflecting being the operative words.

    Science has to be more than, "Just a feeling".

    [ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j_P5OWJImHo&feature=related[/ame]
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 2, 2010
  3. Dr Gregg
    Offline

    Dr Gregg BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,901
    Thanks Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +200
    all this shows is event he most intelligent people can get wrapped up in wishful thinking and delude themselves into throwing out their logical thinking to believe. Not very good scientists if they throw away their logic and reasoning that makes a good scientist, or conveniently ignore the same scientific method they use in their careers when its inconvenient to their beliefs
     
  4. Diuretic
    Offline

    Diuretic Permanently confused

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2006
    Messages:
    12,653
    Thanks Received:
    1,397
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South Australia est 1836
    Ratings:
    +1,397
    I see it's really rocked the scientific world......:lol:
     
  5. Freeman
    Offline

    Freeman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +401
    absurd
    what's the relation between logical thinking and darwinism :confused: darwinism is just an hypothsis like Big bang. it gets supporters and sceptics.
     
  6. Father Time
    Offline

    Father Time I'll be Still Alive

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,130
    Thanks Received:
    437
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +437
    [youtube]Ty1Bo6GmPqM[/youtube]
     
  7. amrchaos
    Offline

    amrchaos Pentheus torn apart

    Joined:
    Nov 1, 2008
    Messages:
    9,501
    Thanks Received:
    926
    Trophy Points:
    215
    Location:
    Miami
    Ratings:
    +2,573
    Actually, the passage rdean highlighted is a wonderful dissent.

    Are there any experiments in the process that highlight "random" mutations(exactly what is a random mutation? The logic sounds very familiar, hmmm. ) in cells or biological models in which natural selection is a recordable variable?

    Of course, experiments that show mutations of organisms that were directed by evironmental conditions do exists. Which may suggest that Darwins original idea need to be expanded since it incorporates more than just "natural selection" or "random cell mutations" in which the latter I am having trouble fully understanding.

    What is meant by "Random"? Darwinism screams determinism, not randomness, so what really gives here?
     
  8. Dr Gregg
    Offline

    Dr Gregg BANNED

    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2010
    Messages:
    2,901
    Thanks Received:
    198
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +200
    "If religion has taught us anything, its that we get nowhere calling our ignorance, god"
     
  9. Freeman
    Offline

    Freeman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Sep 30, 2009
    Messages:
    3,063
    Thanks Received:
    128
    Trophy Points:
    85
    Ratings:
    +401
    or calling our ignorance "spontaneous occurrence" or "chance"?

    the hazard is the god of darwinists :cool:
     
  10. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    40,723
    Thanks Received:
    6,254
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +10,482
    Evolution has NEVER been proven to have created a whole new species from an old one. With in a species we can clearly see changes occurring but no one has EVER provide a direct link to an ANIMAL changing from one form to a completely different one.
     

Share This Page