- Nov 11, 2008
- 3,209
- 453
- 98
Let's just say that the wedge document confirmed the existing goal of creationism/ID. Why do you think, when it became clear that creationism wasn't going to be accepted in public school science classes, that they retooled it to become Intellignt Design by removing the overt references to God??? It was nothing but an attempt to dress up religion to look like science to advance their selfish agenda. As they say, if you put a dress on a pig, it's still a pig. Now that ID was embarrassed on a national level at the Dover, PA trial, they are making more attempts to disguise their intent.
That is nothing but conjecture on your part and doesn't belong in a science class.
Immie
Your faith is blinding you (did you follow the Dover, PA trial? Apparently not) and I never suggested that it belongs in a science class. You're being disingenuous.