Ruth Bader Ginsburg was one of the worst justices on the Supreme Court, a polite debate...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,970
52,237
2,290
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

 
We are forever indebted for not resigning during the waning years of Obama. Got to give her that.


But that again goes to show just how bad she was........her bad decision allowed our great and good President to be in a position to replace her....her whole life she made bad decisions and in the end, her decision to stay on the court hurt her side of the aisle.........
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.
Yeah, and then BLM/ANTIFA can tear them down.


Yes....as her statements on abortion become known........

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:

Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

The mobs who pulled down statues will target her as well............and she isn't even innocent like J.K. Rowling, and they are burning her harry potter books.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

:thankusmile:
 
And on her being a eugenicist....who didn't want certain people around? She actually stated this.............and one day it will come out to the general public....

Here's what Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg said in Sunday's New York Times Magazine: "Frankly I had thought that at the time [Roe vs. Wade] was decided," Ginsburg told her interviewer, Emily Bazelon, "there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don't want to have too many of."

The comment, which bizarrely elicited no follow-up from Bazelon or any further coverage from The New York Times -- or any other major news outlet -- was in the context of Medicaid funding for abortion.

 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

Yes we know you hate women and women with equal rights you hate even more it is the Republican mantra to have that stag only party and to deny females and minorities rights and inclusion. I can tell you that you are a minority in your active depreciation of equal rights and females in active roles in our nation.
 
This columnist makes the case that Ginsburg is perhaps one of the worst Supreme Court justices...

Ginsburg used her seat on the Supreme Court as a political office and, reputedly, her dying wish was political. The politicization of her Supreme Court seat and the political fallout from her death are, therefore, appropriate topics.
------
That praise -- that she “fought” for “justice and equality” -- sums up everything that was wrong with Ginsburg for it describes a political activist, not a judge. The Supreme Court is supposed to consist of nine people who try, apolitically, to ensure that the United States is run along constitutional lines.

Ginsburg, though, had little love for the Constitution. She was quite open about that in 2012 when she offered some “helpful” advice to the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt as it was contemplating the Egyptian Constitution of 2012:


“I would not look to the U.S. Constitution, if I were drafting a constitution in the year 2012,” Ginsburg said in an interview on Al Hayat television last Wednesday. “I might look at the constitution of South Africa. That was a deliberate attempt to have a fundamental instrument of government that embraced basic human rights, have an independent judiciary. It really is, I think, a great piece of work that was done.”
The South African Constitution does not promote a small government for free people who possess inherent rights that must be free from political interference. Instead, it’s a micromanaging monstrosity that identifies “rights” (some copied from us), that are, in fact, privileges subject to the political winds.
--------

Ginsburg was also a covert eugenicist. In 2009, she confessed that she had imagined abortion as a way to get rid of undesirables:


Frankly I had thought that at the time Roe was decided, there was concern about population growth and particularly growth in populations that we don’t want to have too many of. (Emphasis added.)
Since the late 19th century, when progressives have spoken about getting rid of undesirable populations, they’ve meant blacks. Of the 61 million babies aborted since Roe v. Wade, 32% have been black. Blacks make up less than 14% of the population.

Ginsburg was also an awful judge. A good Supreme Court opinion, like a solid house, is built on a constitutional foundation, with the materials coming from clear and strong precedent and law. Ginsburg’s opinions, especially when she was pushing political ends, were composed of random bits and pieces of law that could be cobbled together to make a rough shack. She and her clerks hid this shoddy construction in muddy and muddled writing surrounded by myriad case citations that were never entirely on point.

Yes we know you hate women and women with equal rights you hate even more it is the Republican mantra to have that stag only party and to deny females and minorities rights and inclusion. I can tell you that you are a minority in your active depreciation of equal rights and females in active roles in our nation.


You are obviously wrong. I want Amy Barrett to replace Ginsburg.....and this is the CDZ......attacks on other posters is not allowed.
 
Lefties do love a justice that doesn't allow the constitution to get in the way.

You mean slavery and women not allowed to vote??


Slavery was ended...because of our Constitution, and women have the Right to vote...because of our Constitution..... our country was founded when slavery was a universal practice around the world, and it was also a universal practice that men had the vote .......... our Constitution made it possible to change both.....
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...


Yes....and one day she will be seen as one of the worst Justices on the Supreme Court...she will be studied for how not to be a judge....
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...


Yes....and one day she will be seen as one of the worst Justices on the Supreme Court...she will be studied for how not to be a judge....

That is your opinion and I am sure many on the right will feel that way while many on the left will kindly disagree ( well not so kindly ) and it will be debated if her votes and her opinion of ruling really sway any other minds on the court like O’Connor could...

In the end she will be viewed by your side as horrible and from the left as great and by me someone that had less impact than O’Connor did...

Her replacement should be a woman...
 
She'll be remembered as one of the giants of the first part of the 2000's. There will be statues made of her.

I doubt any statues will be made of her but she and her work will be studied and debated for generations to come especially with future students in law and political science...


Yes....and one day she will be seen as one of the worst Justices on the Supreme Court...she will be studied for how not to be a judge....

That is your opinion and I am sure many on the right will feel that way while many on the left will kindly disagree ( well not so kindly ) and it will be debated if her votes and her opinion of ruling really sway any other minds on the court like O’Connor...

In the end she will be viewed by your side as horrible and from the left as great and by me someone that had less impact than O’Connor did...

Her replacement should be a woman...


Her replacement should be anyone qualified to be a Supreme Court justice no matter the sex or race...

But this time, Amy Barrett is in the pipeline.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top