Russia claims it captured Trump's nice, new smart missiles after Syrian strike

MindWars

Diamond Member
Oct 14, 2016
42,227
10,743
2,040
Russia Claims It Captured Trumpā€™s ā€˜Nice, New & Smartā€™ Missiles After Syrian Strike
Two of President Trumpā€™s ā€œnice and new and smartā€ cruise missiles were recovered non-detonated by the Syrian Armed Forces on April 14, one day after the US, the UK and France fired more than 100 rockets into Syria according to the Russian TASS new agency.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russia can probably capture a lot more than we know about that's for sure.
 
Russia Claims It Captured Trumpā€™s ā€˜Nice, New & Smartā€™ Missiles After Syrian Strike
Two of President Trumpā€™s ā€œnice and new and smartā€ cruise missiles were recovered non-detonated by the Syrian Armed Forces on April 14, one day after the US, the UK and France fired more than 100 rockets into Syria according to the Russian TASS new agency.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russia can probably capture a lot more than we know about that's for sure.
They didn't show anything on your dumb link. Better luck next time.
 
Russia says a lot of things.

Yeah they do, but there are several news agencies that are saying that Russia now has 2 of our missiles.
If Russia wants our missiles so much, then they are admitting that their weapons are inferior. Anyways, soon, China will be able to kick everyone's ass.

Actually, they are telling us that they have them and are more than likely seeing what kind of technology is in it so that they can defeat them in the future.

No, they are not saying their weapons are inferior.
 
This was one of the reasons given for not engaging in a non-crucial use of these weapons. All we did was reduce their effectiveness in the event they might really be needed.
And where in heck was the 'self-destruct' mechanism?
 
This was one of the reasons given for not engaging in a non-crucial use of these weapons. All we did was reduce their effectiveness in the event they might really be needed.
And where in heck was the 'self-destruct' mechanism?

You know, I'm not really sure that Tomahawk missiles come with self destruct buttons. You might want to ask a Naval Missile Tech (MT). They would know something like that.
 
This was one of the reasons given for not engaging in a non-crucial use of these weapons. All we did was reduce their effectiveness in the event they might really be needed.
And where in heck was the 'self-destruct' mechanism?

You know, I'm not really sure that Tomahawk missiles come with self destruct buttons. You might want to ask a Naval Missile Tech (MT). They would know something like that.
Standard procedure would dictate that the capacity to destroy such a device, in case it went awry, be necessary. That is could just 'come down' somewhere unexploded and intact is unthinkable.
 
Russia says a lot of things.

Yeah they do, but there are several news agencies that are saying that Russia now has 2 of our missiles.

This was one of the reasons given for not engaging in a non-crucial use of these weapons. All we did was reduce their effectiveness in the event they might really be needed.
And where in heck was the 'self-destruct' mechanism?

You know, I'm not really sure that Tomahawk missiles come with self destruct buttons. You might want to ask a Naval Missile Tech (MT). They would know something like that.

https://www.quora.com/Do-cruise-mis...n-case-of-accidental-launch-or-change-of-mind
 
Russia says a lot of things.

Yeah they do, but there are several news agencies that are saying that Russia now has 2 of our missiles.


Do you have any idea how easy it is to put a transponder in a missile of that cost and sophistication that reports back its status that would tell us it hadn't detonated? And for us to give it an either auto-destruct or manual destruct signal in that case? Russia hasn't the military budget to even try to produce a missile of that high a cost in any sort of number---- don't forget that such missiles require a massive support system. When Russia has a failure, a success, either way, it NEVER tells you the truth. They either lie to cover up their mistakes and misdeeds or they lie to keep the enemy in the dark. The very fact that they are leaking this out there tells you immediately it is all propaganda to try to gain a political bluff. Bluff is their main tool of offense. Or as the Russians call it: strategy. The Russians are NEVER where they say they are doing what it is they say they are doing. They would never give away such a valuable secret until absolutely necessary.
 
Russia Claims It Captured Trumpā€™s ā€˜Nice, New & Smartā€™ Missiles After Syrian Strike
Two of President Trumpā€™s ā€œnice and new and smartā€ cruise missiles were recovered non-detonated by the Syrian Armed Forces on April 14, one day after the US, the UK and France fired more than 100 rockets into Syria according to the Russian TASS new agency.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Russia can probably capture a lot more than we know about that's for sure.
Trump gave them the blueprints months ago. This is just the cover up.
 

Forum List

Back
Top