- Thread starter
- #101
So, Rudy was wrong to back trials in civilian court for the terrorists of the 1993 bombings?
I believe so, even though the circumstances surrounding the arrests and detaining of those 1993 animals was far more conducive to a civilian trial.
Not so with this current crop of 9-11 terrorists.
You would do well to educate yourself on the subject more - and do so post-haste.
This thing is gonna be a fiasco for Obama - and unfortunately, potentially dangerous for America...
What's the difference? They are criminals, murderers, nothing more. Nothing less. They planned these crimes againats Americans on American soil. What's the difference, again?
The fact you are asking that very question betrays your own alarming ignorance.
Please study up on the facts surrounding the apprehension of these two cases - and how they will directly impact the probabilty for success this time around.
A very-very naive move by this White House...