Rudy Blasts Obama's Idiotic Move

[Sinatra]

So, Rudy was wrong to back trials in civilian court for the terrorists of the 1993 bombings?

I believe so, even though the circumstances surrounding the arrests and detaining of those 1993 animals was far more conducive to a civilian trial.

Not so with this current crop of 9-11 terrorists.

You would do well to educate yourself on the subject more - and do so post-haste.

This thing is gonna be a fiasco for Obama - and unfortunately, potentially dangerous for America...

What's the difference? They are criminals, murderers, nothing more. Nothing less. They planned these crimes againats Americans on American soil. What's the difference, again?

The fact you are asking that very question betrays your own alarming ignorance.

Please study up on the facts surrounding the apprehension of these two cases - and how they will directly impact the probabilty for success this time around.

A very-very naive move by this White House...

 

[Vast LWC]

So, getting back to YOUR boy Rudy.....why was is OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now?

Simple - pre-9-11 vs post-9-11.

And you can dislike Rudy all you want - his statement was completely correct on this matter.

HUGE error by the White House...

What does "pre-9-11 vs post-9-11" mean? And what does it have to do with our Judicial system?

Apparently some right-wing political hacks are under the impression that the rule of our nations justice system were somehow re-written on 9/11.

Not to mention the fact that they think 9/11 somehow negated the Geneva Convention.

 

[VaYank5150]

I believe so, even though the circumstances surrounding the arrests and detaining of those 1993 animals was far more conducive to a civilian trial.

Not so with this current crop of 9-11 terrorists.

You would do well to educate yourself on the subject more - and do so post-haste.

This thing is gonna be a fiasco for Obama - and unfortunately, potentially dangerous for America...

What's the difference? They are criminals, murderers, nothing more. Nothing less. They planned these crimes againats Americans on American soil. What's the difference, again?

The fact you are asking that very question betrays your own alarming ignorance.

Please study up on the facts surrounding the apprehension of these two cases - and how they will directly impact the probabilty for success this time around.

A very-very naive move by this White House...

It's OK....you don't know and everyone knows it. The BIGGER question is, if you think Rudy is such a swell guy and has all the answers, why didn't he admit that he made a mistake backing the civilian trials for the 1993 bombing?

 

[Vast LWC]

Simple - pre-9-11 vs post-9-11.

And you can dislike Rudy all you want - his statement was completely correct on this matter.

HUGE error by the White House...

Oh so post an attack on the World Trade Center in 2001 is a whole different world than the post an attack on the World Trade Center 1993 world?

LOL, who's writing your gags, Sinatra? Funny stuff.

The government response should have been different post - 1993.

Given the resulting and far more significant damage of 9-11, even more so...

Yeeeeaaaah.

Let me ask you a question:

How many people per year die from Terrorist attacks?

Now, how many people per year die from Lightning Strikes?

Your continuous attempts to keep the entire country under a blanket of fear, for the purpose of right-wing political gain, are not working anymore.

 

[Ravi]

KSM will be convicted and either executed or spend life in federal prison.

Bet on it.

Sorry to burst your bubble, Sinatra...your hopes for his freedom will never be realized.

 

[Sinatra]

What's the difference? They are criminals, murderers, nothing more. Nothing less. They planned these crimes againats Americans on American soil. What's the difference, again?

The fact you are asking that very question betrays your own alarming ignorance.

Please study up on the facts surrounding the apprehension of these two cases - and how they will directly impact the probabilty for success this time around.

A very-very naive move by this White House...

It's OK....you don't know and everyone knows it. The BIGGER question is, if you think Rudy is such a swell guy and has all the answers, why didn't he admit that he made a mistake backing the civilian trials for the 1993 bombing?

No - the bigger question is the setting up of a civilian trial for these 9-11 animals.

The 1993 case is not a valid comparable - legally speaking.

You best find out why as your ignorance is glaring...

 

[Contessa_Sharra]

So far, the Islamists have attacked us twice under the reign of the Boy King Obama.

Source?

 

[Vast LWC]

So far, the Islamists have attacked us twice under the reign of the Boy King Obama.

Source?

I think Frankie boy is trying to compare some guy going insane and shooting a dozen people in Texas in the name of Allah, to 3000 people dying on 9/11 in an organized terrorist strike..

Because there's NO difference there at all, right?

 

[Sinatra]

So far, the Islamists have attacked us twice under the reign of the Boy King Obama.

Source?

I think Frankie boy is trying to compare some guy going insane and shooting a dozen people in Texas in the name of Allah, to 3000 people dying on 9/11 in an organized terrorist strike..

Because there's NO difference there at all, right?

Your same muddied stream of attempted logic would then discount the 1993 Twin Tower attacks as being applicable to the 2001 attacks.

Can't have it both ways pard...

 

[Ravi]

AQ is not sitting around waiting for a reason to dislike us...quit being such a coward, Sinatra.

 

[Vast LWC]

Source?

I think Frankie boy is trying to compare some guy going insane and shooting a dozen people in Texas in the name of Allah, to 3000 people dying on 9/11 in an organized terrorist strike..

Because there's NO difference there at all, right?

Your same muddied stream of attempted logic would then discount the 1993 Twin Tower attacks as being applicable to the 2001 attacks.

Can't have it both ways pard...

The 1993 Twin Tower attacks were also an organized terrorist plot by a terrorist organization to kill thousands of people, it was just not as effective as 9/11.

There are many simliarities between the two Twin Towers plots and almost none between either and Fort Hood.

Two apples and one orange there, pard.

 

[Vast LWC]

Ask Rudy, He could tell you, after all, 9/11 was his only campaign platform.

Oh, and, as a New Yorker, I can guarantee that the majority of my fellow New Yorkers will be quite estatic to have justice done on these motherfuckers right here in NYC.

In fact I can find a whole lot of residents of the five boroughs that will be happy to pull the switch themselves.

Rudy's been blinded by pure political ambition. He should know better.

 

[Rinata]

Wait a minute.........I think it there

Yes.....no mistake about it



When republicans don't get their way



I smell FEAR MONGERING

Perhaps, but Obama doesn't hesitate to shit on the survivors of the 9/11 victims in favor of his 2012 campaign. What a guy.

What are you talking about?? If you people ever go even one day without making untrue and stupid remarks about the prez, I think I'll have a parade.

 

[Rinata]

Rudy, one more flip flopping phoney hypocrite...

...who supported trying the 1993 twin tower bombers IN NYC.

jeezus, mary, and joseph...

Yes, he most certainly did.

 

[Sinatra]

I think Frankie boy is trying to compare some guy going insane and shooting a dozen people in Texas in the name of Allah, to 3000 people dying on 9/11 in an organized terrorist strike..

Because there's NO difference there at all, right?

Your same muddied stream of attempted logic would then discount the 1993 Twin Tower attacks as being applicable to the 2001 attacks.

Can't have it both ways pard...

The 1993 Twin Tower attacks were also an organized terrorist plot by a terrorist organization to kill thousands of people, it was just not as effective as 9/11.

There are many simliarities between the two Twin Towers plots and almost none between either and Fort Hood.

Two apples and one orange there, pard.

The motivation for the attacks were quite similar - but the details of the actual arrests were not.

Go back and study up - you clearly don't understand the legal logistics of what is currently and unwisely being attempted - to say nothing of the more far-reaching terrorism implications...

 

[Liability]

Giuliani is RIGHT ON THE MARK with these comments, and states them with the kind of clarity and force missing from our current crop of elected officials and media elite. The last couple of minutes in particular are particularly strong.

Well done Mr. Mayor - and thank you...

___


YouTube - Rudy Giuliani on KSM's trial in NYC (2 of 2)

Hizzoner, the former Mayor of NYC, was, of course, quite simply correct.

And, the President is a schmuck.

 

[Sinatra]

Giuliani is RIGHT ON THE MARK with these comments, and states them with the kind of clarity and force missing from our current crop of elected officials and media elite. The last couple of minutes in particular are particularly strong.

Well done Mr. Mayor - and thank you...

___


YouTube - Rudy Giuliani on KSM's trial in NYC (2 of 2)

Hizzoner, the former Mayor of NYC, was, of course, quite simply correct.

And, the President is a schmuck.

Agreed - Rudy clearly layed out the folly of what Holder and the White House are attempting with these civilian trials of terrorist criminals.

It is quite possible the detractors of Giuliani in this thread did not actually view his comments - just as they don't understand the actual legal implications of what the Obama administration is attempting to undertake - and which they had no actual NEED to attempt.

 

[Ravi]

Rudy is a coward that wants to placate AQ.

 

[Sinatra]

Giuliani is RIGHT ON THE MARK with these comments, and states them with the kind of clarity and force missing from our current crop of elected officials and media elite. The last couple of minutes in particular are particularly strong.

Well done Mr. Mayor - and thank you...

___


YouTube - Rudy Giuliani on KSM's trial in NYC (2 of 2)

Hizzoner, the former Mayor of NYC, was, of course, quite simply correct.

And, the President is a schmuck.

Agreed - Rudy clearly layed out the folly of what Holder and the White House are attempting with these civilian trials of terrorist criminals.

It is quite possible the detractors of Giuliani in this thread did not actually view his comments - just as they don't understand the actual legal implications of what the Obama administration is attempting to undertake - and which they had no actual NEED to attempt.

,,,

 

[Ravi]

Rudy is a coward that wants to placate AQ.

...