Rudy Blasts Obama's Idiotic Move

[Sinatra]

Ah, the collective yearnings of the liberals to return to a pre 9-11 world.

Not gonna happen folks...

 

[Bfgrn]

Using deferments allowed by law does not a draft dodger make, but I suspect you know that.

We're not talking about laws, we're talking about character...

OK. Then we can expect no hypocrisy from you on that. Clinton, Biden, just for starters, got deferments. What does that say about their character to you?

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers... Rudy is...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers

No, they're just typical liberal pussies.

 

[WillowTree]

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers

No, they're just typical liberal pussies.

and both of them are dumb as dirt!

 

[VaYank5150]

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers

No, they're just typical liberal pussies.

and both of them are dumb as dirt!

Can you say "Strategery"? I knew you could....

 

[Ravi]

Rudy is a coward.

 

[bodecea]

Ah, the collective yearnings of the liberals to return to a pre 9-11 world.

Not gonna happen folks...

We know YOU are pissing your pants over this....Be Afraid! Be Very Afraid! OBL wants you to be!

 

[bodecea]

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers

No, they're just typical liberal pussies.

and both of them are dumb as dirt!

Well, how far in the world have they gotten compared to Brilliant You?

 

[Dee]

Rudy is so morally bankrupt, I put little stock into anything he says.

If we do not give everyone a fair trial then we are becoming the thing we used to hate, and in the process creating more terrorists not less.

 

[Si modo]

We're not talking about laws, we're talking about character...

OK. Then we can expect no hypocrisy from you on that. Clinton, Biden, just for starters, got deferments. What does that say about their character to you?

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers... Rudy is...

Your hypocrisy is so very transparent, thus whatever you are trying to claim about another's character just doesn't seem to have much weight.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Ex-NY mayor says 'America won' in Moussaoui trial - ki news ?

But the former mayor added: "If you believe in this system, you have to be willing to agree with conclusions that you would not share.

"The greater value I think would have been if he was executed. But the greater value is demonstrating what America is like.

"America won tonight," he said, arguing that the United States had upheld the worth of its legal system in the eyes of the world.

Oh dear....that's leaving a mark, isn't it?

Rudy supported bringing the 1993 world trade center bombers to NYC as well.

Kneejerk opposition to the Obama administration trumps hypocrisy on the right.

 

[Si modo]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

 

[VaYank5150]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

So, according to Rudy, it was OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now? Why would that be, do you think?

 

[bodecea]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

So, according to Rudy, it was OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now? Why would that be, do you think?

Well, we are seeing some systematic ignoring of that little inconsistancy on this thread. Have you noticed?

 

[Sinatra]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

Yes - the White House has made a terrible error in judgement here.

Just heard a report that Holder stated on one of the weekend news programs that he simply called Obama to inform him of his decision - meaning Obama was "out of the loop". Holder stated he had only consulted his wife and brother regarding the decision. WTF?????

In the political world this is a clear message of trying to construct deniability for Obama if/when this fiasco blows up in their faces - OR - we have a president who is in fact out of the loop and is a mere figurehead while various operatives are actually running the show. To have a president not be the primary policy decision maker on something as important as these 9-11 trials, would be astounding - and disturbing...

 

[Bfgrn]

I don't consider Clinton or Biden warmongers

No, they're just typical liberal pussies.

Yea, killing and torturing are as American as apple pie...we're a christian nation... thanks for reminding me...


"War will exist until that distant day when the conscientious objector enjoys the same reputation and prestige that the warrior does today"
John Kennedy

 

[VaYank5150]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

Yes - the White House has made a terrible error in judgement here.

Just heard a report that Holder stated on one of the weekend news programs that he simply called Obama to inform him of his decision - meaning Obama was "out of the loop". Holder stated he had only consulted his wife and brother regarding the decision. WTF?????

In the political world this is a clear message of trying to construct deniability for Obama if/when this fiasco blows up in their faces - OR - we have a president who is in fact out of the loop and is a mere figurehead while various operatives are actually running the show. To have a president not be the primary policy decision maker on something as important as these 9-11 trials, would be astounding - and disturbing...

So, getting back to YOUR boy Rudy.....why was is OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now?

 

[LibocalypseNow]

This embarrassing stuff really isn't all that surprising. This U.S. President is nothing more than an inexperienced Community Organizer. This guy is clearly in way over his head. Without his teleprompter,he seems to be completely clueless. This stuff is both funny and sad at the same time.

 

[AllieBaba]

So far, the Islamists have attacked us twice under the reign of the Boy King Obama.

And where are the attackers?

Calling a black president "boy" is racist. Turd. But you knew that. Both.

Bullshit. Not when he's being called "The Boy King".

That isn't the same as saying, "Move over to the right, boy".

But nice try to keep that racism rolling.

 

[Sinatra]

The lib talking points in this thread are so pat, yet Obama has really stepped in it with having this in a civilian court. He has already alienated many in the IC, and this may likely give him a unanimous alienation of a large group on which he heavily depends.

And, it seems Obama knows he has stepped in it as he is already trying to toss Holder under the bus on this one.

Yes - the White House has made a terrible error in judgement here.

Just heard a report that Holder stated on one of the weekend news programs that he simply called Obama to inform him of his decision - meaning Obama was "out of the loop". Holder stated he had only consulted his wife and brother regarding the decision. WTF?????

In the political world this is a clear message of trying to construct deniability for Obama if/when this fiasco blows up in their faces - OR - we have a president who is in fact out of the loop and is a mere figurehead while various operatives are actually running the show. To have a president not be the primary policy decision maker on something as important as these 9-11 trials, would be astounding - and disturbing...

So, getting back to YOUR boy Rudy.....why was is OK to try the 1993 bombers in civilian court, but not now?

Simple - pre-9-11 vs post-9-11.

And you can dislike Rudy all you want - his statement was completely correct on this matter.

HUGE error by the White House...