Discussion in 'Current Events' started by crazy canadian, Jun 11, 2004.
I think all the socialists should move to Canada.
Socialists are welcome in America. For now...
Really though, America is the land of opinion, they can stay just as well as capitalists. They have the same rights, including the right to ignore reason and logic.
Hey Crazy - I like your avatar
I also am a 'fan' of RWA - probly his biggest
Are we talking about the liberals or communist style socialists?
Im one of those old style liberals and capitalists, and if anyone trys to kick our founding ideals out of this country, im gonna start shootin, or move to canada eh.
There is no difference. There idealogy is still flawed in the basic premises. The liberal movement is a neocommunist movement. Has been since the late sixties. Read David Horowitz sometime. He is very good and analyzing the flaws with communism and the left.
HAH! modern communism has no similarities with our founding ideals. .. But Ill look into it.
Then I think there should be two governments. People shouldn't vote for their gov't of choice, they should sign up for their gov't of choice. Two governments could run the American people.
Socialists vs. Capitalists. And it's a race from there.
If capitalists win, then they get to save the world, if socialists win, then they get to save the world.
Either way, the world gets saved.
You get to sign up for which tax bracket you choose.
One at 18%, or whatever a capitalist would want, the other at 45% or whatever a socialist would want.
The socialists get to give their money to their gov't, and build up a stash, the capitalists get to keep theirs and donate it to charities.
Just share laws and everything. Or they could be sub-gov'ts, or something. Would people be able to live that way, or is that to much of a division?
But socialism depends on keeping the producers and achievers of society in the system against their will. If those willing to work and take care of their own needs are able to opt out, they will, leaving the deadbeats to distribute the income of other deadbeats. It just won't work, as it depends on the victimization of society's successful. What income will be redistributed if the earners are allowed to opt out, which they most certainly would?
Two governments? You're lost it. You're quite nutty.
Separate names with a comma.