Ron Paul: "Successful Economic Policies? For Whom?"

Discussion in 'Politics' started by Reasoning, Sep 7, 2010.

  1. Reasoning
    Offline

    Reasoning Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 15, 2010
    Messages:
    403
    Thanks Received:
    70
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +71
    Ron Paul: "Successful Economic Policies? For Whom?"

    REAL FULL ARTICLE HERE @
    Successful Economic Policies? For Whom?

    Last week, in the wake of another uptick in the official unemployment rate, the administration continued to claim that their economic policies were working, just not fast enough. This administration inherited an unemployment rate of 7.7% and promised a peak of no higher than 8% if their policies were followed. Not only does the administration have a funny way of ending a war, but now they claim their economic policies are successful. For whom, I wonder?

    These policies are not working for the 9.6% of Americans who are out of work, nor for the over16% underemployed. They are not working for nearly 3 million Americans who have declared bankruptcy in the last two years, or the 40 million currently on food stamps. Nearly 1 in 6 Americans depend on those and other government anti-poverty programs such as Medicaid and unemployment benefits. As more Americans are added to the unemployment rolls, the tax base from which to hand out their benefits is shrinking. Still, businesses are being taxed and regulated out of the market, adding to the problem. What solutions are put forth? More government spending - even as each citizen’s portion of the public debt is over $43,000 and expected to increase by $250,000 over the next 40 years.

    No, this economy is not working for these people. But current economic policy does “work” for some people. For example, it has worked out very well for certain bankers and large corporations, who took on too much risk and got themselves in hot water, and were declared “too big to fail” which is really a euphemism for “friends in high places”. It works well for large, well-connected military industrial corporations, who can always count on perpetual war and conflict to keep them in business. It also works for those on the government’s payroll, which is increasing as the tax base is decreasing.

    So where does the government get all this money even as its most obvious stream of revenue dries up? How can it keep spending seemingly indefinitely? Once it steals as much from you as it can get away with through taxation, it steals even more from you through what central bankers like to call quantitative easing, which is more or less the same thing as counterfeiting. When the money is no longer based on a finite quantity of something of value, like a store of gold or silver, the amount of money in circulation is not limited by anything but the restraint of those in control of the printing presses, in our case the Fed and the US Treasury. When increasing pressure is put upon them by irresponsible politicians, it is predictable that out of thin air, more money will be created to satisfy the insatiable appetites of those on political spending sprees. As money becomes more plentiful, it becomes less valuable, and the average citizen suffers again as the value of their savings evaporates. It has happened over and over in history, and what usually follows is the total debasement of the currency, hyperinflation and chaos.

    Sound economic policy would be to take our foot off the gas and apply the brakes to government spending as the economic cliff approaches. We must get back to where our economy produces actual wealth, rather than mere paper wealth. The road back to fiscal sanity and a strong economy is simple: Congress just needs to get back to following the Constitution.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Micky G. Jagger
    Offline

    Micky G. Jagger Member

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2009
    Messages:
    656
    Thanks Received:
    31
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +31
    We can't save ourselves to a robust economic expansion.

    Huh?

    Huh?
     
  3. Avatar4321
    Online

    Avatar4321 Diamond Member Gold Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2004
    Messages:
    70,568
    Thanks Received:
    8,171
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Minnesota
    Ratings:
    +12,207
    George Soros. He's doing pretty well. Cant possibly be because his organizations are writing the policies, could it? Funny how that works...
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. johnrocks
    Offline

    johnrocks Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,919
    Thanks Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    West Monroe, La.
    Ratings:
    +279
    He was the only one in 08 on the GOP side that I could enthusiastically vote for, thanks for the article, his economic perspectives makes more sense to me than either the demand or supply siders.
     
  5. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    The only ones who have been successful and have benefited from this Socialist nightmare are the Corrupt Politicians & Corporate Fat Cats on Wall Street. There has been no success for the people. How sad.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. shintao
    Offline

    shintao Take Down ~ Tap Out

    Joined:
    Aug 27, 2010
    Messages:
    7,231
    Thanks Received:
    320
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +339
    Yeah, you might have to run government for yourselfs to end corruption, but you can do it.
     
  7. Dick Tuck
    Offline

    Dick Tuck Board Troll

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 2009
    Messages:
    8,511
    Thanks Received:
    501
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +502
    Talk about dogmatic nonsense, Paul takes the cake. What would have happened if Bush didn't do TARP and our largest financial institutions failed? Can you say depression cycle? It's amazing that he can sell this economic libertarian bullshit, and have people agreeing with him.
     
  8. johnrocks
    Offline

    johnrocks Silver Member

    Joined:
    Feb 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,919
    Thanks Received:
    279
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    West Monroe, La.
    Ratings:
    +279
    As opposed to the Obama bullshit or Bush bullshit people eat up,lol.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. DiamondDave
    Offline

    DiamondDave Army Vet

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 2008
    Messages:
    18,169
    Thanks Received:
    2,812
    Trophy Points:
    183
    Location:
    MD, on the Potomac River
    Ratings:
    +2,816
    Or socialism inspired bullshit which has been proven to fail economically?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. kwc57
    Offline

    kwc57 BOHICA Obama

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2009
    Messages:
    12,166
    Thanks Received:
    2,304
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Oklahoma City, OK
    Ratings:
    +2,799
    Their assets and accounts would be sold off to solvent institutions as was done back during the banking crisis of the 80's and S&L crisis of the 90's and life would continue on as before. Before you say I don't know what I'm talking about, I've spent the last 30 years in bank data processing and have run many projects where insolvent bank's assets were absorbed into solvent banks. It's simply business as usual. It is survival of the fitest. Let the weak and corrupt die instead of keeping them alive. It makes for a much more robust economy and industry in the long run.
     

Share This Page