ROFLMAO, Kellog's Reports $53 Million in Losses After Banning all its Ads on Breitbart

JimBowie1958

Old Fogey
Sep 25, 2011
63,590
16,757
2,220
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence
^^^ FAKE NEWS ^^^
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

While it might be Karmic, the graph shown at the link would seem to indicate the company was already doing poorly before pulling ads from Breitbart.
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

While it might be Karmic, the graph shown at the link would seem to indicate the company was already doing poorly before pulling ads from Breitbart.
4th quarter 2015 Kellog's lost almost $300 million. If they only lost $50 million in 2016, looks like dumping Breitbart was a good idea.

http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/02/1...oss-as-consumers-abandon-cereal-products.html
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

While it might be Karmic, the graph shown at the link would seem to indicate the company was already doing poorly before pulling ads from Breitbart.
4th quarter 2015 Kellog's lost almost $300 million. If they only lost $50 million in 2016, looks like dumping Breitbart was a good idea.

A Sharp Loss for Kellogg as Sales of Cereal Falter

2014-2015, but yeah, that's a much worse quarterly loss. Kelloggs seems to have far worse problems than whether they advertise on Breitbart.
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

While it might be Karmic, the graph shown at the link would seem to indicate the company was already doing poorly before pulling ads from Breitbart.
4th quarter 2015 Kellog's lost almost $300 million. If they only lost $50 million in 2016, looks like dumping Breitbart was a good idea.

A Sharp Loss for Kellogg as Sales of Cereal Falter

2014-2015, but yeah, that's a much worse quarterly loss. Kelloggs seems to have far worse problems than whether they advertise on Breitbart.
It'll be okay once Trump brings all our cereal jobs back from China :laugh:
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

While it might be Karmic, the graph shown at the link would seem to indicate the company was already doing poorly before pulling ads from Breitbart.
Suga loaded products like cereal have been losing popularity by consumers. Kellogg's has not adjusted.
 
2014-2015, but yeah, that's a much worse quarterly loss. Kelloggs seems to have far worse problems than whether they advertise on Breitbart.
While sugar based cereals are going out, for the most part, not all of Kellogs cereals were sugar based, like their most popular Cornflakes a health and easily prepared staple of many Americans breakfasts.

There is generally no one cause that continues from quarter to quarter of a mega-corporations failures, but instead these tend to be repeated failures that are separate from each other.

Does one seriously think that the same mothers who dropped Kellogs from their family's menu in 2014, dropped them again in 2016?

No, the losses they had under the Breitbart ban are very likely completely unrelated to why they were dropped by Patriotic Americans in 2014, except for one factor; the same limp-dicked management that made the call for a ban on Breitbart advertising.
 
Correlation is not causation
Yeah, the good Bishop Berkeley made a similar argument centuries ago, but a good kick to any stone laying on the ground suggests otherwise.

When A almost always precedes B, more likely than not it is causation of some form.

While correlation does not prove causation necessarily, Causation always has correlation and correlation is a good indicator of where to start looking for causation.

No scientist ever said that looking for a cause should start with things one NEVER finds correlating with the effect.
 
People are reducing the carbs they eat and sugar coated cereal is the worse food you can eat to make you fat. Oatmeal or bacon and eggs are much better for you and much lower calories.
 
The president and his flock, should not complain when people boycott the Ivanka line....same thing.
But doesnt this fall into the category of "attacking the Presidents family"?

Why is Ivanka evil just because she is Trumps daughter?
 
The president and his flock, should not complain when people boycott the Ivanka line....same thing.
But doesnt this fall into the category of "attacking the Presidents family"?

Why is Ivanka evil just because she is Trumps daughter?
I don't think she is evil, but neither is Kellogg...

And I never boycott anything, if I need it, I buy it...that poor worker making the product isn't at fault...they have family mouths to feed...

why should I make them lose their job?
 
2014-2015, but yeah, that's a much worse quarterly loss. Kelloggs seems to have far worse problems than whether they advertise on Breitbart.
While sugar based cereals are going out, for the most part, not all of Kellogs cereals were sugar based, like their most popular Cornflakes a health and easily prepared staple of many Americans breakfasts.

There is generally no one cause that continues from quarter to quarter of a mega-corporations failures, but instead these tend to be repeated failures that are separate from each other.

Does one seriously think that the same mothers who dropped Kellogs from their family's menu in 2014, dropped them again in 2016?

No, the losses they had under the Breitbart ban are very likely completely unrelated to why they were dropped by Patriotic Americans in 2014, except for one factor; the same limp-dicked management that made the call for a ban on Breitbart advertising.

Again, based on the graph shown in the Breitbart article, dropping ads from that site seemed to have very little impact on Kelloggs. The companies profits were already poor before they stopped advertising on the site.

If you are just saying stopping advertisements on Breitbart was a poor management decision and part of a trend of poor management decisions, meh, I can buy that. Certainly the company seems to have found itself in troubled waters the past few years.
 
Correlation is not causation
Yeah, the good Bishop Berkeley made a similar argument centuries ago, but a good kick to any stone laying on the ground suggests otherwise.

When A almost always precedes B, more likely than not it is causation of some form.

While correlation does not prove causation necessarily, Causation always has correlation and correlation is a good indicator of where to start looking for causation.

No scientist ever said that looking for a cause should start with things one NEVER finds correlating with the effect.

In the case of the Breitbart ads, though, there doesn't even seem to be much correlation. Kelloggs dropped their Breitbart ads in November of 2016. According to the chart on Breitbart, in Nov. Kelloggs saw a brief jump in (sales? profits? market share? the chart doesn't specify) and then a brief drop, before leveling out into the slow decline it was already on. Did the company get a small bump from dropping the ads? Did it get a small drop? Did it get both? Did it have no effect? There's very little information there to go on.

What I've seen is that Kelloggs has been on a downward trend for profits since sometime in 2014. I haven't seen anything to indicate what effect stopping their advertising on Breitbart may have had, if any.
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence

Good, now to hit starbucks, and all the other traitors.
 
Will these fools ever learn?

The left is not in a numerical majority, they only pretend to be and use their loud orchestrated protests and demonstrations to make the illusion. The 90% of the rest of the population, you know, NORMAL PEOPLE, resent these bastards and tend to go the opposite way from them.

Now Kellogs bowed to these commusnist bastards by banning its ads from Breitbart and now they have lost $53 million!

ROFLMAO

Kellogg's CEO: Massive Layoffs at Time of Massive Boycott Total Coincidence
Nice fake news you got there.
 
Correlation is not causation
Yeah, the good Bishop Berkeley made a similar argument centuries ago, but a good kick to any stone laying on the ground suggests otherwise.

When A almost always precedes B, more likely than not it is causation of some form.

While correlation does not prove causation necessarily, Causation always has correlation and correlation is a good indicator of where to start looking for causation.

No scientist ever said that looking for a cause should start with things one NEVER finds correlating with the effect.

In the case of the Breitbart ads, though, there doesn't even seem to be much correlation. Kelloggs dropped their Breitbart ads in November of 2016. According to the chart on Breitbart, in Nov. Kelloggs saw a brief jump in (sales? profits? market share? the chart doesn't specify) and then a brief drop, before leveling out into the slow decline it was already on. Did the company get a small bump from dropping the ads? Did it get a small drop? Did it get both? Did it have no effect? There's very little information there to go on.

What I've seen is that Kelloggs has been on a downward trend for profits since sometime in 2014. I haven't seen anything to indicate what effect stopping their advertising on Breitbart may have had, if any.
You, sir, are TOO logical!
 

Forum List

Back
Top