Sallow
The Big Bad Wolf.
This is a pretty concise high level talk about the "Free Market".
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What you fail to comprehend is government has given us the crony corrupt capitalism we have today. The little geek thinks we need more government intrusion to fix this. Do you fail to see the idiocy of his argument?What "accurate" macro picture do you want?
Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
At the present time, it's lopsided and we are feeling the effects.
Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
This is a pretty concise high level talk about the "Free Market".
This is a pretty concise high level talk about the "Free Market".
This is a pretty concise high level talk about the "Free Market".
Sallow let this be a lesson for you. You need to take stock...and stop believing the lies of the Left. Can you do it?
This is a pretty concise high level talk about the "Free Market".
Milton Friedman uses a pencil to school Reich
Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
Okay, but do you recognize any good from Capitalism?I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
It's not "binary". And it's "symbiotic" only in the sense that Capitalism must have, as a necessary component, a fully functional government in which to operate. Governments, however, have existed without the presence of Capitalism. Capitalism arose as a reaction to the precept that wealth should only be controlled by Royalty. It came out of mercantilism, which held that profit, land ownership and commerce should be available to everyone.
Okay, but do you recognize any good from Capitalism?I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
It's not "binary". And it's "symbiotic" only in the sense that Capitalism must have, as a necessary component, a fully functional government in which to operate. Governments, however, have existed without the presence of Capitalism. Capitalism arose as a reaction to the precept that wealth should only be controlled by Royalty. It came out of mercantilism, which held that profit, land ownership and commerce should be available to everyone.
Yes, a very government-centric way of looking at it, as I said.I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
It's not "binary". And it's "symbiotic" only in the sense that Capitalism must have, as a necessary component, a fully functional government in which to operate. Governments, however, have existed without the presence of Capitalism. Capitalism arose as a reaction to the precept that wealth should only be controlled by Royalty. It came out of mercantilism, which held that profit, land ownership and commerce should be available to everyone.
Yes, a very government-centric way of looking at it, as I said.I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.Capitalism isn't some sort of natural result of private enterprise. That's a bullshit assessment. It is the result of laws, regulations, security and infrastructure all built and set up by the government. That's what sets up an environment where business can be conducted.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
It's not "binary". And it's "symbiotic" only in the sense that Capitalism must have, as a necessary component, a fully functional government in which to operate. Governments, however, have existed without the presence of Capitalism. Capitalism arose as a reaction to the precept that wealth should only be controlled by Royalty. It came out of mercantilism, which held that profit, land ownership and commerce should be available to everyone.
.
Yes, I have no doubt that a person from your political perspective views that as an absolute.Yes, a very government-centric way of looking at it, as I said.I clearly point out that "both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic", and you try to paint me as "anti-government".Another perfect example of my point: A government-centric view of capitalism.
There are two pieces to the puzzle: Government and industry, the implementation of capitalism, without which the system itself is absolutely irrelevant.
Both must work hand in hand, they are symbiotic. You and Reich start with government, it is your intellectual foundation.
"Macro" means both sides must be fully recognized and addressed. They are not here. As usual.
.
Capitalism wasn't even around before government.
A necessary component of Capitalism is the government.
None of you or your anti-government compatriots advocate removing patents, copyrights, land deeds, limited liability, bankruptcy, or a plethora of other things, provided at tax payer expense that assists in the accumulation of wealth.
Yes, the binary thought processes of obedient hardcore partisan ideologues, always amusing.
.
It's not "binary". And it's "symbiotic" only in the sense that Capitalism must have, as a necessary component, a fully functional government in which to operate. Governments, however, have existed without the presence of Capitalism. Capitalism arose as a reaction to the precept that wealth should only be controlled by Royalty. It came out of mercantilism, which held that profit, land ownership and commerce should be available to everyone.
.
Capitalism, by it's very nature, is government centric.