Rights Gone to Potty

Discussion in 'USMB Breaking News' started by Peony, Apr 26, 2016.

  1. Peony
    Offline

    Peony Rookie Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2016
    Messages:
    31
    Thanks Received:
    41
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Ratings:
    +136
    During her commencement speech at Jackson State University last Saturday, Michelle Obama took a shot at Mississippi’s “religious freedom bill”.

    Michelle Obama Slams Mississippi ‘Religious Freedom’ Bill in Commencement Speech

    “We see it right here in Mississippi — just two weeks ago -– how swiftly progress can hurtle backward,” the first lady said. “How easy it is to single out a small group and marginalize them because of who they are or who they love.”

    Actually, Mrs. Obama, Mississippi’s law basically allows for an employee with a belief that marriage is a union between one man and one woman and that any other combination is not a marriage and is a sin- to not hand a same sex couple a Marriage License application. The law also assures that all steps are made that the couple not be keep waiting or inconvenienced in any way by this other employee handing them the application. Indeed, the couple probably won’t even be aware of it.

    Mississippi, HB 1523 or the Protecting Freedom of Conscience from Government Discrimination Act, would protect religious organizations and individuals from being forced to act against their faith on matters involving same-sex marriage. Government officials who want to recuse themselves from involvement in a same-sex marriage would have to take “all necessary steps” to ensure that a marriage license is not delayed.

    Mississippi HB1523 | 2016 | Regular Session

    Imagine, if you will. It’s a government building where licenses are issued. Two workers are behind the desk. A same sex couple requests a license. A religious worker says to the couple, “one moment please.” This worker walks over to the other worker and asks him to wait on the people at the desk. No one is being denied anything here, Mrs. Obama. The couple gets their license, the religious person doesn’t have to wring her hands over the prospect of burning in hell. Those serious about everybody’s rights might even call it a win/win.

    Mrs. Obama says that, “so we've got to stand side by side with all our neighbors –- straight, gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender; Muslim, Jew, Christian, Hindu immigrant, Native American -- because the march for civil rights isn't just about African Americans, it's about all Americans," she said. "It's about making things more just, more equal, more free for all our kids and grandkids….”


    According to Michelle Obama, the fight for more freedom has caused her husband much suffering as he bravely defends things like the right to use any toilet you want.

    First Lady Criticizes Mississippi's 'Religious Freedom' Bill

    “…North Carolina’s Law, H.B. 2, is “an act to provide for single-sex multiple occupancy bathroom and changing facilities in schools and public agencies and to create statewide consistency in regulation of employment and public accommodations.”

    It also states that those restrooms are to be used according to one’s biological sex – “the physical condition of being male or female, which is stated on a person’s birth certificate.” The law also allows for “accommodations” by allowing entities to provide single-use restrooms “upon a person’s request due to special circumstances.”

    Obama in UK: NC Bathroom Law and Mississippi Religious Freedom Law Should be Overturned

    No, Mrs. Obama, it is not a loss of civil rights that someone with a penis has to use the Men’s room. We’re not talking segregation that denies someone a seat. This is a common sense response to a whole lot of caterwauling over how bathrooms ought to be used. In short, the Woman’s room is where people with vaginas go potty. The Men’s Room is where people with penises go potty.

    No, Mrs. Obama, it is not marginalizing a group of people to insist that they use the toilet in a room with other people who have the same style genitalia. Yes, we’ve all been told that some people don’t always feel the same way in terms of their gender identity. The law provides for accommodation. In other words, that male who feels like a female at the very moment the girls are showering in the Girl’s locker room will not be denied the right to use the toilet. The principal will let this person use his private bathroom after he’s finished in there.

    You see, Mrs. Obama, it’s not taking one’s rights away by not saluting their genital du jour. There’s a time and a place for attention seeking. Empting your bladder really ought not be one of those times. How sad that a law has to be created to remind us of that. No one is being denied access to a toilet. This is not religious freedom blocking rest room freedom. Rather than edifying a graduating class on the beauty of civil rights in this country, you are exhibiting the very divisiveness you claim to abhor.

    Frankly, Mrs. Obama, all your arm waving and claims of rampant vitriol over of a so-called marginalized group upset because everybody doesn’t celebrate their every move, sound very much like poopy talk better delivered by someone wearing a diaper than a cap and gown.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
  2. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    46,268
    Thanks Received:
    6,880
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +44,413
    I think its sad we have to legislate individual freedom in AMERICA
     
  3. TheOldSchool
    Offline

    TheOldSchool Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2012
    Messages:
    55,921
    Thanks Received:
    9,276
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    last stop for sanity before reaching the south
    Ratings:
    +37,419
    I think it's funny that so many people want to police and regulate our naughty bits
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    156,549
    Thanks Received:
    14,084
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +44,387
    Mississippi has to be so worried about out bits and pieces.

    No one has a right to hold a civil service job and not serve a customer because of his beliefs that have nothing to do with the job.

    The fed courts will knock it down.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    46,268
    Thanks Received:
    6,880
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +44,413
    Discrimination from the institution is beyond bullshit. The institution doesn't have "rights"
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. midcan5
    Offline

    midcan5 liberal / progressive

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2007
    Messages:
    11,542
    Thanks Received:
    2,564
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Philly, PA
    Ratings:
    +4,114
    "To think of humans as freedom - loving, you must be ready to view nearly all of history as a mistake." John Gray

    Freedom to discriminate is about as un-American as it can get. Whenever conservative republicans mention freedom think of those ten hands. If Conservatism is the Ideology of Freedom ….

    "Where *freedom is real, equality is the passion of the masses. Where equality is real, freedom is the passion of a small minority." Eric Hoffer
     
  7. Martin Eden Mercury
    Offline

    Martin Eden Mercury VIP Member Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    United States of America
    Ratings:
    +426
    So we get to codify discrimination, by public employees, based on privately held religious beliefs? Sounds like South Africa Apartheid, and Southern, Christian Jim Crow laws.

    What happens if everyone in the public office that day share a belief that marriage can only be defined as 'a union between one man and one woman' (defined by them, contrary to law)?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. JakeStarkey
    Offline

    JakeStarkey Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2009
    Messages:
    156,549
    Thanks Received:
    14,084
    Trophy Points:
    2,165
    Ratings:
    +44,387
    Public employees can disagree but will go to work and do their job the same for all applicants.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. Tommy Tainant
    Offline

    Tommy Tainant Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    10,095
    Thanks Received:
    1,152
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Y Cae Ras
    Ratings:
    +6,874
    This is where your argument falls apart. What if both employees were minded that way ? Should the state then actively recruit non Christian staff to avoid that problem ?
    Would that not mean that Christians were being discriminated against in the work place ?
    What a mess !!
    Civil servants should serve all tax payers who pay their wages, no ifs no buts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. DarkFury
    Offline

    DarkFury Platinum Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2015
    Messages:
    24,973
    Thanks Received:
    7,340
    Trophy Points:
    390
    Ratings:
    +35,861
    Your argument is the one that fails. Why have two faggots NOT tried to get a cake at an islamic bakery? Because government ALLOWS islam to trump rights.

     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1

Share This Page