Right to Exist? Who cares?

SAYIT

Diamond Member
Feb 26, 2012
56,138
12,517
2,250
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

And so the "Palestinians" are required to continue tossing in generation after generation of the young to feed the fire of hate? That seems like child abuse to me.
I wonder how the parents justify their actions to one another?
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

And so the "Palestinians" are required to continue tossing in generation after generation of the young to feed the fire of hate? That seems like child abuse to me.
I wonder how the parents justify their actions to one another?

If they accepted the 1948 UN resolutions they'd have a home today. They VOLUNTARILY vacated their homes to allow the other arabs to "drive the Jews into the sea". But something unforeseen happened. The Jews beat the crap out of the arabs. The arabs lost the war just like the germans lost the war. But the arab/moslem mentality is that they get everything and you get nothing. No matter what. The palestinians could have signed numerous peace treaties with Israel but peace is not their way. Killing is their way. Always.
 
But who can really blame the Palestinians? Had they accepted the 1948 UN resolution, that would have meant their own Palestinian State with self determination without Israel to suck off anymore to provide for them.


Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

And so the "Palestinians" are required to continue tossing in generation after generation of the young to feed the fire of hate? That seems like child abuse to me.
I wonder how the parents justify their actions to one another?

If they accepted the 1948 UN resolutions they'd have a home today. They VOLUNTARILY vacated their homes to allow the other arabs to "drive the Jews into the sea". But something unforeseen happened. The Jews beat the crap out of the arabs. The arabs lost the war just like the germans lost the war. But the arab/moslem mentality is that they get everything and you get nothing. No matter what. The palestinians could have signed numerous peace treaties with Israel but peace is not their way. Killing is their way. Always.
 
The very first islamo nazi propaganda I read as a child was a description ---WITH PICTURES of the arabs living in Gaza---it was circa 1960-------so sad------bedraggled mal-nourished looking people standing behind BARBED WIRE enclosures Pictures of wornout bedraggled women in rags carrying pails of water and sacks of rice from a UN RELIEF TRUCK The pictures were captioned "ISRAEL DID THIS TO US" "ISRAEL PUT US IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS" I was horrified and showed the pamphlet to my mother. I said "look what is going on in israel" She said "GAZA is not in Israel---it is in Egypt" If only the 1967 war had not happened
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

ACTUALLY "JUST SAYING THE WORDS" IS AN ACT OF FRAUD, BECAUSE THE WORDS FORM A LIE....any questions? LOL
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

ACTUALLY "JUST SAYING THE WORDS" IS AN ACT OF FRAUD, BECAUSE THE WORDS FORM A LIE....any questions? LOL

Yeah, imbecile ... like the questions in the original post.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace, ya pompous jackass?
 
Yes, I have a question. When did Israel's ancient land become this "Palestinian" land that Israel is now stealing or occupying?




There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

ACTUALLY "JUST SAYING THE WORDS" IS AN ACT OF FRAUD, BECAUSE THE WORDS FORM A LIE....any questions? LOL
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....and the "peace process" translates as "blocking peace at any cost". Even the slowest mind would concede that the very last thing that the Israeli governments wants is peace...peace is anathema to the Jewish interests...peace would be the proverbial monkey-wrench...it would force the filth to declare permanent boards and hold to them---there goes the land theft, and the spate of criminal Jewish settlements that accompany it...peace might jeopardize the uncounted billions these bloodsucker squeeze out of the U.S. taxpayer...peace would permit the Palestinians to develop a viable economic base that was not dependent upon Jewish whims...peace is the real threat to these sharks---not Islamic terrorism...
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....and the "peace process" translates as "blocking peace at any cost". Even the slowest mind would concede that the very last thing that the Israeli
governments wants is peace...peace is anathema to the Jewish interests...peace would be the proverbial monkey-wrench...it would force the filth to declare permanent boards and hold to them---there goes the land theft, and the spate of criminal Jewish settlements that accompany it...peace might jeopardize the uncounted billions these bloodsucker squeeze out of the U.S. taxpayer...peace would permit the Palestinians to develop a viable economic base that was not dependent upon Jewish whims...peace is the real threat to these sharks---not Islamic terrorism...


Very good----you have studied the writings of nazi war criminals who did the propaganda for the dogs ------after escaping to egypt and syria-----that is the stuff I read as a child------circa 1960 I was a bit confused by it because way back then I had no idea that SYRIA was an "arab" country Since all the syrians I knew were christians with a cross with extra lines--------I assumed that syria was one of the BALKAN states and syrians were something like my playmates whose parents were from Yugoslavia
 
Just saying the words constitutes an existential threat to THE UMMAH

ACTUALLY "JUST SAYING THE WORDS" IS AN ACT OF FRAUD, BECAUSE THE WORDS FORM A LIE....any questions? LOL

Yeah, imbecile ... like the questions in the original post.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace, ya pompous jackass?


Awwwwwwww ya sound a bit flustered there SAYIT...so pitiful when lies spin back on their craftsman---such are the risk/reward ratios of pathological liars...:badgrin:
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....

Evidently your comprehension skills have not improved since last we spoke.
I already ceded, for the sake of argument, that there is no such thing as a states right to exist and I repeat: WHO THE FUCK CARES? If saying Israel has that right costs the "Palestinians" nothing but offers them the opportunity - remote as it might be - to solve the conflict, what have they to lose?
Clearly your "concern" for the plight of those hapless "Palestinians" still starts and ends with your mindless hate for Joooos. Pathetic.
 
ACTUALLY "JUST SAYING THE WORDS" IS AN ACT OF FRAUD, BECAUSE THE WORDS FORM A LIE....any questions? LOL

Yeah, imbecile ... like the questions in the original post.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace, ya pompous jackass?


Awwwwwwww ya sound a bit flustered there SAYIT...so pitiful when lies spin back on their craftsman---such are the risk/reward ratios of pathological liars...:badgrin:

I should defer to you on that, Princess. No one knows the ins and outs of lying like you do.:badgrin::badgrin::badgrin:
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....and the "peace process" translates as "blocking peace at any cost". Even the slowest mind would concede that the very last thing that the Israeli governments wants is peace...peace is anathema to the Jewish interests...peace would be the proverbial monkey-wrench...it would force the filth to declare permanent boards and hold to them---there goes the land theft, and the spate of criminal Jewish settlements that accompany it...peace might jeopardize the uncounted billions these bloodsucker squeeze out of the U.S. taxpayer...peace would permit the Palestinians to develop a viable economic base that was not dependent upon Jewish whims...peace is the real threat to these sharks---not Islamic terrorism...

In fact, a stable, prosperous peaceful Palestinian state would provide Israel with an improved trading partner and the diminished military needs would free up their resources ... a nice peace dividend. That's what so worries the Nazi types among us ... an Israel free of that which now constrains their economic growth.:eusa_angel:
 
There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?

Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....and the "peace process" translates as "blocking peace at any cost". Even the slowest mind would concede that the very last thing that the Israeli governments wants is peace...peace is anathema to the Jewish interests...peace would be the proverbial monkey-wrench...it would force the filth to declare permanent boards and hold to them---there goes the land theft, and the spate of criminal Jewish settlements that accompany it...peace might jeopardize the uncounted billions these bloodsucker squeeze out of the U.S. taxpayer...peace would permit the Palestinians to develop a viable economic base that was not dependent upon Jewish whims...peace is the real threat to these sharks---not Islamic terrorism...

In fact, a stable, prosperous peaceful Palestinian state would provide Israel with an improved trading partner and the diminished military needs would free up their resources ... a nice peace dividend. That's what so worries the Nazi types among us ... an Israel free of that which now constrains their economic growth.:eusa_angel:

as if to accurately underscore your signature ignorance, Israel has steadfastly barred economic development among the Palestinians---so it is only natural---within the context of Zio-propaganda---that you would attribute the opposite to Israel's designs...Zionism is no less than a pathological condition...a brain infection that simultaneously both limits input and output---leaving its adherents at the mercy of vulgar, cyclically repeated lies...
 
Either you are not a very bright individual, or you willfully miss the point---no state has a "right to exist"....and the "peace process" translates as "blocking peace at any cost". Even the slowest mind would concede that the very last thing that the Israeli governments wants is peace...peace is anathema to the Jewish interests...peace would be the proverbial monkey-wrench...it would force the filth to declare permanent boards and hold to them---there goes the land theft, and the spate of criminal Jewish settlements that accompany it...peace might jeopardize the uncounted billions these bloodsucker squeeze out of the U.S. taxpayer...peace would permit the Palestinians to develop a viable economic base that was not dependent upon Jewish whims...peace is the real threat to these sharks---not Islamic terrorism...

In fact, a stable, prosperous peaceful Palestinian state would provide Israel with an improved trading partner and the diminished military needs would free up their resources ... a nice peace dividend. That's what so worries the Nazi types among us ... an Israel free of that which now constrains their economic growth.:eusa_angel:

as if to accurately underscore your signature ignorance, Israel has steadfastly barred economic development among the Palestinians---so it is only natural---within the context of Zio-propaganda---that you would attribute the opposite to Israel's designs...Zionism is no less than a pathological condition...a brain infection that simultaneously both limits input and output---leaving its adherents at the mercy of vulgar, cyclically repeated lies...

Nothing compared to underscoring your disinformative nature. You've simply provided another dose of typical SkitShot camel crap. How Israel deals with an enemy committed to her destruction is far different than how she deals with those prospreous, stable, peaceful nations.
 
In fact, a stable, prosperous peaceful Palestinian state would provide Israel with an improved trading partner and the diminished military needs would free up their resources ... a nice peace dividend. That's what so worries the Nazi types among us ... an Israel free of that which now constrains their economic growth.:eusa_angel:

as if to accurately underscore your signature ignorance, Israel has steadfastly barred economic development among the Palestinians---so it is only natural---within the context of Zio-propaganda---that you would attribute the opposite to Israel's designs...Zionism is no less than a pathological condition...a brain infection that simultaneously both limits input and output---leaving its adherents at the mercy of vulgar, cyclically repeated lies...

Nothing compared to underscoring your disinformative nature. You've simply provided another dose of typical SkitShot camel crap. How Israel deals with an enemy committed to her destruction is far different than how she deals with those prospreous, stable, peaceful nations.

haven't you got that ass-backwards rube? Israel steals land and erects an illegal state---and then presumes to characterize natural and just resistance as " a commitment to its destruction"?? What you cannot surmount in your febrile comebacks is that the initial treachery of the Jews is the issue
 
as if to accurately underscore your signature ignorance, Israel has steadfastly barred economic development among the Palestinians---so it is only natural---within the context of Zio-propaganda---that you would attribute the opposite to Israel's designs...Zionism is no less than a pathological condition...a brain infection that simultaneously both limits input and output---leaving its adherents at the mercy of vulgar, cyclically repeated lies...

Nothing compared to underscoring your disinformative nature. You've simply provided another dose of typical SkitShot camel crap. How Israel deals with an enemy committed to her destruction is far different than how she deals with those prospreous, stable, peaceful nations.

haven't you got that ass-backwards rube? Israel steals land and erects an illegal state---and then presumes to characterize natural and just resistance as " a commitment to its destruction"?? What you cannot surmount in your febrile comebacks is that the initial treachery of the Jews is the issue

I will ask you the same question I asked the other enlightened people.

Do you think much about the poor Native Indian you stole the land from, the same one that was butchered by your nation of pioneers?
 

Forum List

Back
Top