There are now two threads dedicated to the state's right to exist concept and specifically to Israel's right to exist.
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?
For the sake of argument we will agree that there is no such thing as a state's right to exist.
As things now stand the "Palestinians" have suffered through 64 years of wandering in the desert.
Would anyone have them do another 64 years of penance rather than say the words "Israel has a right to exist?"
Hell, they don't have to mean it and they don't have to live by it. All they have to do is say the words and the peace process - such that it is - can move forward.
Isn't that worth a shot at peace?