Likkmee
Gold Member
Maybe Bush can invite him to the Redwoods ? Much easier.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I probably could, yes. But, I probably wont have to, since I will have alternatives.Of course, Dawkins merely posed a question....dang you snowflakes just cant even get through a day without a hissy fit:Richard Dawkins ponders whether synthetic human meat can ‘overcome our taboo against cannibalism’
He wants to grow human stem cells so he can eat other human beings.
Can't say I'm surprised.
"“Tissue culture ‘clean meat’ already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this,” Dawkins wrote, before sharing a link to the article. “What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus ‘yuck reaction’ absolutism.”
He merely posted the question?
The question is, can we overcome our taboo?
Could you?
What is wrong with this if anything?
Yeah, I would try it.I probably could, yes. But, I probably wont have to, since I will have alternatives.Of course, Dawkins merely posed a question....dang you snowflakes just cant even get through a day without a hissy fit:Richard Dawkins ponders whether synthetic human meat can ‘overcome our taboo against cannibalism’
He wants to grow human stem cells so he can eat other human beings.
Can't say I'm surprised.
"“Tissue culture ‘clean meat’ already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this,” Dawkins wrote, before sharing a link to the article. “What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus ‘yuck reaction’ absolutism.”
He merely posted the question?
The question is, can we overcome our taboo?
Could you?
What is wrong with this if anything?
So it does not weird you out?
You would eat human flesh?
Yeah, I would try it.I probably could, yes. But, I probably wont have to, since I will have alternatives.Of course, Dawkins merely posed a question....dang you snowflakes just cant even get through a day without a hissy fit:Richard Dawkins ponders whether synthetic human meat can ‘overcome our taboo against cannibalism’
He wants to grow human stem cells so he can eat other human beings.
Can't say I'm surprised.
"“Tissue culture ‘clean meat’ already in 2018? I’ve long been looking forward to this,” Dawkins wrote, before sharing a link to the article. “What if human meat is grown? Could we overcome our taboo against cannibalism? An interesting test case for consequentialist morality versus ‘yuck reaction’ absolutism.”
He merely posted the question?
The question is, can we overcome our taboo?
Could you?
What is wrong with this if anything?
So it does not weird you out?
You would eat human flesh?
What does that have to do with anything? We can still form a moral code through reason and enforce it by law. Just because a bear shits in the woods doesn't mean that you or I are bound to do so. Silly red herring...very, very weak, sir...For the atheist, mankind are nothing but glorified animals. Problem is, what do we do to animals?