Avorysuds
Gold Member
Thats because Obama had to deal with the late 2008 economic depression left by bush's 5.1 trillion spending
You lost me again... So a depression was caused by spending, yet you support Obama who spends more....... You're currently stumbling over your own hypocrisy.
I wonder if Mitt wins if you will credit him the same leniency as you do Obama.
Obama had to spend big and his plan extends to 2016 where He will bring spending down 22 percent, so yes he did spend and unemployment isn't getting that much better but don't expect a two year recovery lets see what republicans will do, oh wait Americans don't want republicans in office that must tell you something
I see, you're the typical Obama-bot... Lets call a truce, you go on your way riding that Obama-cock where "in the future" things pan out, someday... even when that date is pushed back multiple times and every benchmark fails to live up to even the worst case predictions. Where Obama can manage to fall short or do the polar opposite of near every meaningful promise he made you. You go your way, and me on my way where today actually counts and the future is unknown.
Ok?