Republicans Admit They Have No Fact Witnesses. Trump Did It

[Uncensored2008]

Again, waiting for someone to show me how they prove intent. Thanks in advance.

Intent is irrelevant. Asking a foreign power WE HAVE A TREATY WITH to work with our AG is not only perfectly legal, but part of Trump's job.

The democrats are panicking due to the corruption of the USAID situation, which is a conduit for embezzlement. The mole Eric Ciaramella is up to his corrupt ass in this.

THIS is what everything has been about from the start, the democrats have been embezzling hundreds of millions from taxpayers and using foreign aid payments to do it. USAID is the means of the elite embezzling huge amounts. Some republicans are involved as well, which is why the effort to cover this up have been so extreme.

I fear for our president's life, those who are exposed will do anything, including assassination, to keep the money flowing.

Asking a foreign power to manufacture a bogus investigation of a political rival ...is illegal on several counts

No one ever did that, you fucking liar.

Let me ask you dumbfuck, did YOU get any of the cash Biden and the elite stole from the American tax payers?

If not, why are you licking their boots, you fucking moron?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

What collusion with Russia?

Hey jerk off...quote where I said anything about "collusion"

You called him Putin’s buddy so you inferred collusion, Herr Lesh. Why don’t you tattle on me again? Pussy.

 

[Billy_Bob]

The left has come totally unhinged... They now believe that TRUMP must prove his innocence and that they do not have to prove anything.... WTF did these people fall and hit their heads...??

 

[Uncensored2008]

The left has come totally unhinged... They now believe that TRUMP must prove his innocence and that they do not have to prove anything.... WTF did these people fall and hit their heads...

This is the biggest scandal in American history. From the day Trump rode the golden escalator until today, the entire attack by the left and the corrupt fucks of the fascist media has ALWAYS been about the embezzlement of hundreds of millions in taxpayer money. What the democrats have tried to protect from the very start is the racket they are using to embezzle foreign aid funds.

Trump has exposed them.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It is the GOP that is pushing the quid pro quo... That is not the burden of proof...

Trump was soliciting a bribe. He was asking for his political opponent to be investigated, he was with holding access and money until he got it... The evidence of him ordering the withholding is there. This has got far bigger than the call and his actions are what is sinking him right now...

The GOP have conceded all that now, Trump's Chief of Staff basically confessed it. Now the GOP are going for that the crime is not bad enough to be fired. Small problem the crime is Bribery and that crime is specifically referenced as impeachable.

Then you should impeach Mulvaney! Oh, wait! You can't! Too bad, so sad!

 

[cnm]

Once again, regardless of the Ukraine president's motives. Him saying the wasn't any quid pro quo ties to Trump's offer of aid to his country.

Link?

In any case, Zelenski was being pressured to make a public statement about investigating Biden by the offer of a White House meeting.

 

[theHawk]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

 

[dudmuck]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

 

[cnm]

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

But impeachable behaviour did happen and was witnessed.

 

[theHawk]

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

But impeachable behaviour did happen and was witnessed.

What is the impeachable behavior? Nothing illegal was done.

Can you cite any law that was broken? Not one libtard has been able to.

Hurting your feelings isn’t a crime.

 

[theHawk]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

And neither one of those things is illegal.

 

[idb]

Again, waiting for someone to show me how they prove intent. Thanks in advance.

Intent is irrelevant. Asking a foreign power WE HAVE A TREATY WITH to work with our AG is not only perfectly legal, but part of Trump's job.

The democrats are panicking due to the corruption of the USAID situation, which is a conduit for embezzlement. The mole Eric Ciaramella is up to his corrupt ass in this.

THIS is what everything has been about from the start, the democrats have been embezzling hundreds of millions from taxpayers and using foreign aid payments to do it. USAID is the means of the elite embezzling huge amounts. Some republicans are involved as well, which is why the effort to cover this up have been so extreme.

I fear for our president's life, those who are exposed will do anything, including assassination, to keep the money flowing.

Without intent you cannot impeach so it’s relevant.

Impeachment is dead. The moment Ciaramella and Zaid were exposed it was dead. BUT the underlying issue is the embezzlement of foreign aid on a massive scale. Trump has exposed this, the elite are MORE than willing to kill to cover it up and keep the funds flowing.

Hunter Biden is a pawn, irrelevant EXCEPT that he defines what the scam is. US Aid is directed to particular companies such as Burisma, who is designated are providing infrastructure and energy. Hundreds of millions go to them, then they funnel a large portion right back to the democrats. Hire a Biden here, give a consulting fee there. Hundreds of millions from the taxpayers in America flow into the pockets of the connected aristocracy.

This is the stuff of conspiracy theories, but Trump has laid it bare, it is undeniable fact, right in front of us.

Ciaramella and Zaid's "exposure" is irrelevant.
Hunter's job is typical nepotism by the rich & powerful but not automatically illegal.

Where are your links to the US aid being 'funneled' back to the Democrats.

 

[luchitociencia]

The President of Ukraine backs up Trump's story that there wasn't any quid pro quo involving aid to his country.

The rest is just smoke and mirrors from the Democrats to Impeach because they know they can't defeat Trump in the 2020 election. ...

In my opinion after watching how the accusations of Democrats have evolved since the beginning of their new scandal, is that their true intent is not the impeachment of president Trump -because there is no valid reason for such a process- but to cause damage to the image of the president and the GOP in general.

Doing so, Democrats can take advantage of their mischievous propaganda in order to obtain the independent votes. They did it recently in these past elections in some states.

Such is a smart but dirty strategy.

Democrats will try to slow the process of this impeachment in order to continue spreading the fake news as much as they can.

Luckily, news pass away very fast, like the infamous Russian collusion, which was forgotten the very next day when president Trump's campaign was out and free from any accusation. It is an advice for the GOP to terminate this process the faster the better.

If not accuser is confronted to verify his/her testimony, then the process is like as in any judicial court: the accuser is not present at the time of giving testimony, then the charges are dropped. Simple.

I think Democrats are unhappy people, they can't enjoy the great economy and freedom that America has reached in the last three years. I truly feel sorry for them.

 

[Wyatt earp]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

Yes, Rudy will happily let himself get thrown under the bus.

Have you met Rudy?

Whapo?


Lay off the crack pipe

 

[dudmuck]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

And neither one of those things is illegal.

yes, but both of them together become bribery.
(extortion is between two people)

because its using money allocated by congress for personal gain.

 

[LuckyDuck]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

1. The US has a Criminal Corruption Treaty with Ukraine, which allows our respective governments to look into any possible corruption being conducted by our respective citizens in Ukraine and visa-versa and because of that treaty, any US President or US Attorney General, has the right to ask the head of Ukraine or their respective national prosecutor, to look into any semblance of corruption that may have been conducted by a US citizen that was in Ukraine and this clearly falls within the president's purview.

 

[cnm]

What is the impeachable behavior?

Betraying the public trust of the US.

 

[cnm]

1. The US has a Criminal Corruption Treaty with Ukraine, which allows our respective governments to look into any possible corruption being conducted by our respective citizens in Ukraine and visa-versa and because of that treaty, any US President or US Attorney General, has the right to ask the head of Ukraine or their respective national prosecutor, to look into any semblance of corruption that may have been conducted by a US citizen that was in Ukraine and this clearly falls within the president's purview.

But Individual1 wanted a public statement that Biden/Burisma was being investigated by Ukraine. That is different from an actual investigation.

 

[Jitss617]

The President of Ukraine backs up Trump's story that there wasn't any quid pro quo involving aid to his country.

The rest is just smoke and mirrors from the Democrats to Impeach because they know they can't defeat Trump in the 2020 election. ...

The President of the Ukraine isn't going to admit he got bullied by POTUS. No foreign leader would admit that.

You guys are running out of excuses...

That’s a fact witness lol

 

[Care4all]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo.

READ THE TRANSCRIPT!
Bottom of pg 2 and top of pg 3

You have an overactive imagination, just like all of the other libtards!

It's right there in SIMPLE English, this for that, investigate 2016 election for javelin missiles.
READ THE TRANSCRIPT!

And? Prove intent. Let’s see it.

You must not know president Trump that well or you're joking....?

His personal campaign lawyer, Giuliani, that he kept telling president Zelensky to get in touch with on the Biden's, should smack you in the face to wake you up on this...

And since when is it right for the President to ask a foreign country to go after and investigate any American citizen, without probable cause and the DOJ of the U.S. involved? Let alone a political rival's son?

Or insist that the foreign gvt make an announcement on television, preferably CNN that the Ukraine opened this investigation in to Biden at Burisma?

Please, Americans are not stupid.... his intent was spelled out, a hundred times over....