Republicans Admit They Have No Fact Witnesses. Trump Did It

[bigrebnc1775]

Just don't cry when it arrives DOA

At some point, Republicans are going to have to do a gut check and ask themselves if they want to establish the presidency is a license to break the law...

I'm guessing... they won't.

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

It is? And you can prove he did it vs a political rival instead of someone he thought helped spread the lie of Russia collusion.

There was no lie about Russian collusion. Biden had no input in any of that in any case

WTF do you think you are talking about

So you are saying Mueller lied?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo.

READ THE TRANSCRIPT!
Bottom of pg 2 and top of pg 3

You have an overactive imagination, just like all of the other libtards!

It's right there in SIMPLE English, this for that, investigate 2016 election for javelin missiles.
READ THE TRANSCRIPT!

And? Prove intent. Let’s see it.

You must not know president Trump that well or you're joking....?

His personal campaign lawyer, Giuliani, that he kept telling president Zelensky to get in touch with on the Biden's, should smack you in the face to wake you up on this...

And since when is it right for the President to ask a foreign country to go after and investigate any American citizen, without probable cause and the DOJ of the U.S. involved? Let alone a political rival's son?

Or insist that the foreign gvt make an announcement on television, preferably CNN that the Ukraine opened this investigation in to Biden at Burisma?

Please, Americans are not stupid.... his intent was spelled out, a hundred times over....

Immoral maybe but not illegal if he trying to find out who tried to screw him in the 2016 campaign. Nothing wrong with asking a foreign country if they helped his adversaries in 2016. It is wrong if he is trying to get dirt on a political opponent. Forget our feelings you have to prove intent and in this case it is very difficult which is why they have not proceeded to full impeachment. My wife is a lawyer and that is how she explained it to me and she is not a Trump fan btw.

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

It is? And you can prove he did it vs a political rival instead of someone he thought helped spread the lie of Russia collusion.

There was no lie about Russian collusion. Biden had no input in any of that in any case

WTF do you think you are talking about

It started in Ukraine. Did you read the Mueller report? The whole Hunter Biden board seat and payment is fishy too. Dude had no experience. Nepotism 101. Again, Herr Lesh, you have to prove intent and the Democrats cannot do that hence they have not impeached.

 

[Sunni Man]

At some point democrats are going to have to do a gut check and realize witch hunts are useless and do more damage than good.

The Democrat party is now comprised of fanatical left wing radicals who are hell bent on destroying the country and will sacrifice anyone and everything to achieve their goal of a communist utopia. ...

 

[Stormy Daniels]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo.

 

[dudmuck]

House Republicans acknowledged that they have no witnesses and no documents to dispute the main facts concerning President Trump’s impeachable conduct: a demand from Ukraine for dirt on a political rival; withholding of aid vital to Ukraine’s defense against Russia; concealing evidence of the scheme by moving a transcript to a secret server; and threatening the tipster who alerted Congress to gross malfeasance. They admitted all that? Well, in a manner of speaking they did.

The Post reports:

House Republicans sent Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) a list of witnesses they want to testify in the impeachment inquiry, including former vice president Joe Biden’s son Hunter Biden and the anonymous whistleblower who filed the initial complaint against President Trump. ...
Schiff is likely to reject many, if not all, of the witnesses from the Republicans’ wish list.

Hunter Biden lacks any direct knowledge of anything that occurred in the Trump White House, and hence he cannot rebut evidence of Trump’s demand that Ukraine interfere with our election. By Republicans’ own admission, the whistleblower lacks first-hand knowledge of events.

(“Witnesses who testified out of public view have corroborated the crux of the case against Trump — that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to investigate his political rivals — so the Democrats see no need for the whistleblower, who heard the story secondhand, to testify. Three career State Department officials are returning next week for the public hearings.”)

All Republicans have are distractions, stunts to generate claims of unfairness, and gimmicks to threaten the life and career of the whistleblower. It’s remarkable, really, that they could stipulate to every fact about which the witnesses testified under oath.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...mit-they-have-no-fact-witnesses-trump-did-it/

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

And neither one of those things is illegal.

yes, but both of them together become bribery.
(extortion is between two people)

because its using money allocated by congress for personal gain.

Look at how their mindless minions move away from "quid pro quo" to "bribery" as one

It's not going to sell, folks. Not especially on the back of Kavanaugh and Mueller

If Mueller failed, why would Trump need help discrediting that?

we havent seen the unredacted mueller report, meaning no conclusion can be made

Roger Stone trial will reveal more.

 

[jc456]

the transcript is out. why do they need anyone for anything?

 

[jc456]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo.

what is it? We saw that biden did it.

 

[Thinker101]

What?! The Steele Dossier was illegal...who would of guessed.

A. It did not breech campaign finance laws in that it was a reported expense .

B. The contract was with an AMERICAN company. THEY took it over seas

C. Dems did not use it and it was turned over to the relevant authorities (the FBI)

So bullshit...

Love how you fricken loons come up with so many bullshit excuses.

 

[jc456]

What?! The Steele Dossier was illegal...who would of guessed.

A. It did not breech campaign finance laws in that it was a reported expense .

B. The contract was with an AMERICAN company. THEY took it over seas

C. Dems did not use it and it was turned over to the relevant authorities (the FBI)

So bullshit...

Love how you fricken loons come up with so many bullshit excuses.

dude, they're russians looking to take over our country.

 

[jc456]

How can you have a witness to a crime that never happened?

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

And neither one of those things is illegal.

yes, but both of them together become bribery.
(extortion is between two people)

because its using money allocated by congress for personal gain.

Look at how their mindless minions move away from "quid pro quo" to "bribery" as one

It's not going to sell, folks. Not especially on the back of Kavanaugh and Mueller

If Mueller failed, why would Trump need help discrediting that?

we havent seen the unredacted mueller report, meaning no conclusion can be made

Roger Stone trial will reveal more.

Trump doesn't need help. the left are losing. Trump is now 4 and 0.

here's the left.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

In other words, if Trump is innocent make him prove it. Is that about right?

 

[Crepitus]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It does indeed look like tRump and co. are preparing to toss Rudy under the bus.

That may turn out to be a huge mistake, I don't think Rudy is the type to take that lying down.

 

[jc456]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It does indeed look like tRump and co. are preparing to toss Rudy under the bus.

That may turn out to be a huge mistake, I don't think Rudy is the type to take that lying down.

based on?

 

[MAGAman]

The President of the Ukraine isn't going to admit he got bullied by POTUS. No foreign leader would admit that.

You guys are running out of excuses...

Tards are so entertaining.

You still have no evidence that there was a quid pro quo. Every witness says there was no quid pro quo. The transcript proves there was no quid pro quo.

Except from Biden.

Its Russian Collusion 2.0

 

[Care4all]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It does indeed look like tRump and co. are preparing to toss Rudy under the bus.

That may turn out to be a huge mistake, I don't think Rudy is the type to take that lying down.

Don't count on that... he probably would take the hit if he knew he would be pardoned by President Trump.

 

[dudmuck]

The phone call to Zelensky happened.
The suspension of aid to Ukraine happened.
Call those who witnessed these.

And neither one of those things is illegal.

yes, but both of them together become bribery.
(extortion is between two people)

because its using money allocated by congress for personal gain.

Look at how their mindless minions move away from "quid pro quo" to "bribery" as one

It's not going to sell, folks. Not especially on the back of Kavanaugh and Mueller

If Mueller failed, why would Trump need help discrediting that?

we havent seen the unredacted mueller report, meaning no conclusion can be made

Roger Stone trial will reveal more.

Trump doesn't need help. the left are losing. Trump is now 4 and 0.

here's the left.

If Trump doesnt need help, why did he ask Boris Johnson?

Trump asked Zelensky to investigate because he couldnt get anybody here to do it.

 

[joaquinmiller]

The President of the Ukraine isn't going to admit he got bullied by POTUS. No foreign leader would admit that.

You guys are running out of excuses...

Tards are so entertaining.

You still have no evidence that there was a quid pro quo. Every witness says there was no quid pro quo. The transcript proves there was no quid pro quo.

Except from Biden.

Its Russian Collusion 2.0

You're just spewing bullshit. There is sworn testimony before Congress as to the QPQ, and specifics as to the "deliverable".

 

[Crepitus]

I have yet to see any evidence of quid pro quo. but the rumor mill is saying if there was it was done by Rudy and Trump didn't know anything about it.

It does indeed look like tRump and co. are preparing to toss Rudy under the bus.

That may turn out to be a huge mistake, I don't think Rudy is the type to take that lying down.

based on?

Probably the same rumor mill your little tRumpkin buddy mentioned.