Republican Capitalism Would Cut Healthcare Prices About 80%...............

EdwardBaiamonte

Platinum Member
Nov 23, 2011
34,612
2,153
1,100
and add 10-20 years to our life spans. In fact, health care is so important that we need capitalism there more than in other industries. Where else do you want to insure maximum quality and minimum price as much?
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
 
and add 10-20 years to our life spans. In fact, health care is so important that we need capitalism there more than in other industries. Where else do you want to insure maximum quality and minimum price as much?

If you believe health care should be operating in a "free market" you obviously don't know what a free market is.
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

immutable-truth-head-up-ass-buried-rectal-cranial-inversion-politics-1314793503.jpg
 
and add 10-20 years to our life spans. In fact, health care is so important that we need capitalism there more than in other industries. Where else do you want to insure maximum quality and minimum price as much?
We had that before 1929.

We still do, St. Jude Children's Research Hospital.
The parents do not pay one penny for the children's hospital stay.
 
Yea, we had that under Bush. When medical bills were the number one cause of bankruptcy.

Sometimes I think Republicans can't possibly be that stupid. That it must be an act.

I get so tired of them proving me wrong.
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

View attachment 226554
Few realize that New England’s first form of government under the Pilgrims was communalism (socialism) where “each produced according to his ability and each received according to his needs,” more than two centuries before Karl Marx first penned the above script. The result of “share the wealth” then and now was, and always will be, shared poverty.

not many can "go to Hell" if they are all Poor.

Shared Inequality is what Jesus the Christ warned us about.
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

View attachment 226554

Like I said, Revisionist History

The Right-Wing Myth That Thanksgiving Celebrates the Pilgrims’ Triumph Over Socialism

Couple things your "professor" leaves out. First, all those pilgrims were "employees" of what, a private enterprise company. A company that required them, by contract, to consolidate their resources and labor. They were forbidden, BY CONTRACT, from owning the land, they were mere employees for a STOCK COMPANY working that land. And they adopted private ownership of land after the owners failed to adequately provide for their employees. If anything, the Pilgrims are a great example of what a union can do, but I am sure that doesn't fit into your narrative at all. Or better yet, the Pilgrims act of abandoning collective ownership was a revolt against a CORPORATION, not exactly a stunning endorsement for capitalism.

Second, they were successful and the first Thanksgiving was in 1621, two years before the abandonment of collective ownership. That success is usually attributed to relations with the Native Americans, a socialist society that didn't even believe in private ownership of land. If they did the Pilgrims would either have starved to death or been victims of genocide.
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

View attachment 226554

Like I said, Revisionist History

The Right-Wing Myth That Thanksgiving Celebrates the Pilgrims’ Triumph Over Socialism

Couple things your "professor" leaves out. First, all those pilgrims were "employees" of what, a private enterprise company. A company that required them, by contract, to consolidate their resources and labor. They were forbidden, BY CONTRACT, from owning the land, they were mere employees for a STOCK COMPANY working that land. And they adopted private ownership of land after the owners failed to adequately provide for their employees. If anything, the Pilgrims are a great example of what a union can do, but I am sure that doesn't fit into your narrative at all. Or better yet, the Pilgrims act of abandoning collective ownership was a revolt against a CORPORATION, not exactly a stunning endorsement for capitalism.

Second, they were successful and the first Thanksgiving was in 1621, two years before the abandonment of collective ownership. That success is usually attributed to relations with the Native Americans, a socialist society that didn't even believe in private ownership of land. If they did the Pilgrims would either have starved to death or been victims of genocide.
OMG. no wonder people like Bernie Sanders (who owns three $600,000 homes) and the Clintons (who with their foundation, made $100,000,000s, for charity but kept most of it for themselves) and you idiots just turned a blind eye. Retards like you , need to have the Margaret Sanger treatment.

Margaret Sanger and the Forced Sterilization of Americans
She wanted desperately to rid the world of “morons” but had she lived long enough, she would have seen for herself that she was an especially destructive and malicious moron herself. (Moron was the actual term they used back then, and it was ambiguous to mean anyone.)
 
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

View attachment 226554

Like I said, Revisionist History

The Right-Wing Myth That Thanksgiving Celebrates the Pilgrims’ Triumph Over Socialism

Couple things your "professor" leaves out. First, all those pilgrims were "employees" of what, a private enterprise company. A company that required them, by contract, to consolidate their resources and labor. They were forbidden, BY CONTRACT, from owning the land, they were mere employees for a STOCK COMPANY working that land. And they adopted private ownership of land after the owners failed to adequately provide for their employees. If anything, the Pilgrims are a great example of what a union can do, but I am sure that doesn't fit into your narrative at all. Or better yet, the Pilgrims act of abandoning collective ownership was a revolt against a CORPORATION, not exactly a stunning endorsement for capitalism.

Second, they were successful and the first Thanksgiving was in 1621, two years before the abandonment of collective ownership. That success is usually attributed to relations with the Native Americans, a socialist society that didn't even believe in private ownership of land. If they did the Pilgrims would either have starved to death or been victims of genocide.
OMG. no wonder people like Bernie Sanders (who owns three $600,000 homes) and the Clintons (who with their foundation, made $100,000,000s, for charity but kept most of it for themselves) and you idiots just turned a blind eye. Retards like you , need to have the Margaret Sanger treatment.

Margaret Sanger and the Forced Sterilization of Americans
She wanted desperately to rid the world of “morons” but had she lived long enough, she would have seen for herself that she was an especially destructive and malicious moron herself. (Moron was the actual term they used back then, and it was ambiguous to mean anyone.)

I am quite interested in the source for your claim that the Clinton's keep most of the money that their charity raises. I am quite sure it is of the same quality as your source for the Pilgrim's failed Socialist experiment which I will return to. See, the Pilgrims came to America as part of an "investment". They were part of a company and in return for their passage to the colony they were required to pool their labor and resources and work collectively. They were suppose to find all kinds of gold and silver and an easily enslaved native population. Hell, the Spanish were doing it. And they were to be supplied by the company they worked for. Now, they didn't grow food on all that collectively property because they thought their company would supply them with their needs. They were searching for gold and silver and when that failed they turned to timber. They had to collect that timber and ship it back to PAY THEIR CORPORATE MASTERS. When those corporate masters failed to come through, big surprise, they tore up their "collective agreement", quit spending their time logging, and started to grow their own food. Funny, it was the failure of the corporate system that initiated their working that land and they worked it far more "collectively" than your source was willing to explain. Furthermore, they declared bankruptcy in 1626, so much for the success you claimed began after 1623.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: cnm
Free market. This country wasn't build on socialism. William Bradford and the Pilgrims already tried that in the early 1600's, and they almost died.

The Pilgrims? You are sadly mistaken if you believe that history revisionism bullshit. .
The Pilgrim’s Failed Socialist Experiment

It is guaranteed that a liberal will deny any Facts or Logic that proves them wrong, even when you provide exactly what was written in the letters that William Bradford gave US, because liberals wont believe their whole life and ideology is one big fucking lie. I am sorry but you just cant fix stupid liberals.

View attachment 226554

Like I said, Revisionist History

The Right-Wing Myth That Thanksgiving Celebrates the Pilgrims’ Triumph Over Socialism

Couple things your "professor" leaves out. First, all those pilgrims were "employees" of what, a private enterprise company. A company that required them, by contract, to consolidate their resources and labor. They were forbidden, BY CONTRACT, from owning the land, they were mere employees for a STOCK COMPANY working that land. And they adopted private ownership of land after the owners failed to adequately provide for their employees. If anything, the Pilgrims are a great example of what a union can do, but I am sure that doesn't fit into your narrative at all. Or better yet, the Pilgrims act of abandoning collective ownership was a revolt against a CORPORATION, not exactly a stunning endorsement for capitalism.

Second, they were successful and the first Thanksgiving was in 1621, two years before the abandonment of collective ownership. That success is usually attributed to relations with the Native Americans, a socialist society that didn't even believe in private ownership of land. If they did the Pilgrims would either have starved to death or been victims of genocide.
OMG. no wonder people like Bernie Sanders (who owns three $600,000 homes) and the Clintons (who with their foundation, made $100,000,000s, for charity but kept most of it for themselves) and you idiots just turned a blind eye. Retards like you , need to have the Margaret Sanger treatment.

Margaret Sanger and the Forced Sterilization of Americans
She wanted desperately to rid the world of “morons” but had she lived long enough, she would have seen for herself that she was an especially destructive and malicious moron herself. (Moron was the actual term they used back then, and it was ambiguous to mean anyone.)
Redundant rhetoric.
 
and add 10-20 years to our life spans. In fact, health care is so important that we need capitalism there more than in other industries. Where else do you want to insure maximum quality and minimum price as much?
Republicans hold all branches of govt. What is the hold up?
 

Forum List

Back
Top