Repeal, And Replace: The 14th Ammendment.

Discussion in 'US Constitution' started by Vastator, Jun 28, 2018.

?

Repeal And Replace The 14th, Ending Birthright Citizenship To Foreign Nationals?

  1. Yes

  2. No

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Natural Citizen
    Offline

    Natural Citizen Gold Member

    Joined:
    Aug 8, 2016
    Messages:
    3,611
    Thanks Received:
    739
    Trophy Points:
    345
    Location:
    Worldwide
    Ratings:
    +2,845
    It's the perfect opportunity to do it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  2. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,682
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    No doubt. The movement just needs some initiative. The measure would no doubt meet with brad support.
     
  3. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    247
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Ratings:
    +53
    " Misdirected Ruse "

    * Searching For A Better Way *

    What you meant to phrase is that citizenship at birth only for children of us citizens should be the policy .

    It is already covered by the constitution by the phrase " and subject to the jurisdiction thereof " that the children of illegals should be given citizenship to the country of their mother Illegal Immigrants Are Not Technically Within US Jurisdiction And Not Entitled To Equal Protection .

    * Hidden Agendas *

    Removing the wright to citizenship by birth in the us constitution is the only way to repeal roe v wade and the discontented subverts of the constitution have been raging against it since 1973 .

    When would one become a citizen , when it is a zygote or an inchoate faeiouyt us , as clearly that precept is absurd ?
     
  4. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,426
    Thanks Received:
    1,682
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,294
    Your post is nonsense. Goodbye.
     
  5. mgh80
    Offline

    mgh80 Silver Member

    Joined:
    Dec 7, 2014
    Messages:
    946
    Thanks Received:
    137
    Trophy Points:
    90
    Ratings:
    +456
    While I'm not for birth-right citizenship, the reason why it doesn't specifically mention it's only applicable to current citizens and legal immigrants is because the amendment was designed to protect freed slaves who were born in the US (who obviously didn't have constitutional protections while being enslaved). So you had slaves who were born in the US and weren't automatically granted citizenship, and the 14th was to protect them.

    The amendment absolutely served its purpose in the past, but is being used and exploited in a way it was never intended to do.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. Monk-Eye
    Offline

    Monk-Eye Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2018
    Messages:
    247
    Thanks Received:
    10
    Trophy Points:
    41
    Ratings:
    +53
    " Better Immigration Policy "

    * How To Fix A Problem *

    Whatever you say , lol .

    us citizens are responsible for immigration .

    A solution to deal with anchor babies by temporary visa immigrants can be solved by a similar suggestion for dealing with illegal immigration , REDUCE LEGAL IMMIGRATION TO THE COUNTRIES OF ORIGIN by some proportion to compensate for the abuse of the system .
     

Share This Page