Repeal, And Replace: The 14th Ammendment.

Discussion in 'US Constitution' started by Vastator, Jun 28, 2018.

?

Repeal And Replace The 14th, Ending Birthright Citizenship To Foreign Nationals?

  1. Yes

  2. No

Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,374
    Thanks Received:
    1,675
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,253
    With a more conservative, traditional, originalist Supreme Court on the horizon; is now the time to cut to the heart of the immigration crisis that has plagued our nation for decades?
    If Conservatives maintain, if not outright expand their power in the legislature; has there ever been a better time to eliminate birthright citizenship to the children of foreign nationals?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    58,263
    Thanks Received:
    8,556
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +58,324
    What does the Supreme Court have to do with repeal/replacing a Constitutional amendment?
     
  3. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,374
    Thanks Received:
    1,675
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,253
    They'll hear the sure to come case. That will absolutely make its way to the USSC. There is simply no question about it.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018
  4. TNHarley
    Offline

    TNHarley Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2012
    Messages:
    58,263
    Thanks Received:
    8,556
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +58,324
    How? The process is protected by the Constitution.
    Some bedwetter might get triggered by it, but i doubt they would even see it. There is nothing to argue. It is what it is.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,374
    Thanks Received:
    1,675
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,253
    So is the presidents right to restrict immigration. Guess where that ended up, despite his Constitutionally unquestionable authority on the matter?
     
  6. Billy_Kinetta
    Offline

    Billy_Kinetta Paladin of the Lost Hour Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    30,841
    Thanks Received:
    5,903
    Trophy Points:
    1,160
    Ratings:
    +37,098
    The phrase "under the jurisdiction thereof" has been the primary source of contention. A case could arise in which the Court could determine that the interpretation employed regarding that phrase is in error (it is) and end its use.

    Repeal/replace would not be necessary.
     
  7. DarkFury
    Offline

    DarkFury BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2015
    Messages:
    27,260
    Thanks Received:
    8,166
    Trophy Points:
    940
    Location:
    Sun, Sand And Palm Trees
    Ratings:
    +39,822
    Not exactly, the law covers children born to American parents and first generation births. The issue of NON citizens giving birth in our country was never directly addressed. A NON citizen an illegal giving birth on this soil is LEGALLY still a ward of their country of birth. So just like YOUR birth in say Canada does NOT make you Canadian their birth here does NOT make them American.
     
  8. Vastator
    Offline

    Vastator Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2014
    Messages:
    10,374
    Thanks Received:
    1,675
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +10,253
    Which is why a clear and consice rewrite is in order. That would stem the flow. And end any questions about whether, or not the children of lawbreaking invaders should stay.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    Last edited: Jun 28, 2018
  9. Sun Devil 92
    Offline

    Sun Devil 92 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2015
    Messages:
    16,538
    Thanks Received:
    1,515
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Ratings:
    +8,744
    It needs to be replaced for several reasons.

    Substantive due process is bullshit.
     
  10. BS Filter
    Offline

    BS Filter VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2018
    Messages:
    3,124
    Thanks Received:
    333
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Ratings:
    +1,913
    No need to repeal or replace it, just replace the justices that abuse it for the leftist agenda.
     

Share This Page