Political Junky
Gold Member
- May 27, 2009
- 25,793
- 3,990
- 280
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
now that you marxists have had your Oblast comm. meeting, let me share this with you,King is right, labor IS a commodity...
das kapital and the clayton act, bon voyage!!!!!
Oh, there's no racism...they want to own ALL the poor and middle class...regardless of race.He's clearly a racist.
Unless you form a union and seize your fair share of the wealth created by the sweat of your brow. For it will never freely be given to you.
now that you marxists have had your Oblast comm. meeting, let me share this with you,King is right, labor IS a commodity...
das kapital and the clayton act, bon voyage!!!!!
Unless you form a union and seize your fair share of the wealth created by the sweat of your brow. For it will never freely be given to you.
Of course they do.... That's the REAL basis of Capitalism. Those with the CAPITAL win, those without, lose.
Why do you think it's called CAPITALIZING on someone else's misfortune?
That's why the country was DESIGNED to have elements of Capitalism AND Socialism built into it. Too much power either way is guaranteed misery.
The government has no right to force a private business to pay any form a base pay.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish (1937):
Facts of the Case:
Elsie Parrish, an employee of the West Coast Hotel Company, received sub- minimum wage compensation for her work. Parrish brought a suit to recover the difference between the wages paid to her and the minimum wage fixed by state law.
Question:
Did the minimum wage law violate the liberty of contract as construed under the Fifth Amendment as applied by the Fourteenth Amendment?
Conclusion:
In a 5-to-4 decision, the Court held that the establishment of minimum wages for women was constitutionally legitimate. The Court noted that the Constitution did not speak of the freedom of contract and that liberty was subject to the restraints of due process. The Court also noted that employers and employees were not equally "free" in negotiating contracts, since employees often were constrained by practical and economic realities. This was found to be especially true in the case of women. This case explicitly overruled the Court's decision in Adkins v. Children's Hospital (1923).
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish | The Oyez Project at IIT Chicago-Kent College of Law
"Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration."now that you marxists have had your Oblast comm. meeting, let me share this with you,King is right, labor IS a commodity...
das kapital and the clayton act, bon voyage!!!!!
Those complaining about Capitalism are either too stupid to capitalize on it or too stupid to know when they already have.