Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Brooks insisted that sea level had been rising continuously since the dawn of man. Homo Sapiens appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago. Here are the data.
That look like a continuous rise to any of you?
And the thread that he's an idiot is an attempt to Frag a man who was asking for other factors that could effect the data.................Pardon me when I fragged your side for manipulated data on another thread.................Where your side absolutely LIED about data.........................Rep Brooks: "...net, not fluctuations"
Yeah, real brain trust there.
Brooks is an ass. All his attempts to limit Duffy's ability to answer clearly show that the last thing he's after is the truth.
Why is the Geological survey benchmark marker under water now below New Orleans................Shall we do the math?
Grand Canyon National Park Facts | Grand Canyon Helicopter Tours | Grand Canyon Day Tours | 702-851-3290 say it is 5.45 trillion cubic yards. In one year, Wilkinson's conclusion is that human triggered erosion would produce 2% of that volume, or 109 billion cubic yards. The volume of current annual sea level rise is approximately a cube 6 miles on a side, or 216 cubic miles. There are 1760 yards in each mile so we get a volume of 216x1760x1760x1760, or 1,177,583,616,000 cubic yards. One 50th of the Grand Canyon would provide 0.00009256 of the required volume.
I am really impressed.
This guy has white hair. How can anyone that old be ignorant enough to pose these questions to the director of Woods Hole. How long can Brooks continue to be an ignorant little bitch? How did this happen in our modern society that this little boy has the power to question the leader of our major scientific institutions? Looks like this moron is from Alabama. It figures.
This guy has white hair. How can anyone that old be ignorant enough to pose these questions to the director of Woods Hole. How long can Brooks continue to be an ignorant little bitch? How did this happen in our modern society that this little boy has the power to question the leader of our major scientific institutions? Looks like this moron is from Alabama. It figures.
If we don't put a stop to idiots like this then this nation is finished as any kind of respectable power. Idiocy like this should be treated as dangerous.
Brooks insisted that sea level had been rising continuously since the dawn of man. Homo Sapiens appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago. Here are the data.
That look like a continuous rise to any of you?
And posted a main factor in Sweden and Norway. Exactly the opposite. However, with satellites, we are able to determine that the sea level is rising. And the primary reason is sea water warming and ice melt.And the thread that he's an idiot is an attempt to Frag a man who was asking for other factors that could effect the data.................Pardon me when I fragged your side for manipulated data on another thread.................Where your side absolutely LIED about data.........................Rep Brooks: "...net, not fluctuations"
Yeah, real brain trust there.
Brooks is an ass. All his attempts to limit Duffy's ability to answer clearly show that the last thing he's after is the truth.
And in this case his meaning was taken as he thought throwing a rock in the Ocean to raise the levels..............Which was CLEARLY NOT HIS INTENT..................................................
I posted another Factor that in Chesapeake was the deciding Factor..............
Perhaps your side didn't take that into consideration as well......................As what I posted according to reports was the main factor there.
As much as it takes.To you, it's all about money. We only have one planet; think of the responsibility we have to keep it livable. Maybe worth a little more than money.Sea level rise – or land subsidence?
Confusion arises because discussions often involve “relative sea level rise” – which combines glacial isostatic and groundwater subsidence, along with actual sea level rise – just as we just did with our 2 feet per century total. However, the term obscures what is really going on and lends itself to climate alarmism, by leaving the false impression that the entire problem is melting icecaps and rising seas.
It clearly is not. Focusing attention on alleged “manmade climate cataclysms,” supposedly driven by carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions, will result in our spending hundreds of billions of dollars to replace oil, gas and coal with expensive, subsidized, land-intensive renewable energy systems – while foregoing hundreds of billions of dollars in jobs and economic growth. Meanwhile, China, India, Indonesia and other developing nations will continue doing what they must to lift billions out of abject poverty and disease: burn more fossil fuels, thereby emitting more CO2.
Those nations are not about to succumb to the Obama EPA “social cost of carbon” con game. This is the fraudulent scheme under which bureaucrats blame U.S. oil, gas, and coal for every climate and weather event, habitat and species loss, and other problem that they can possibly conjure up anywhere in the world – while completely ignoring the phenomenal and undeniable benefits of using those fuels, and the equally important benefits of having more plant-fertilizing carbon dioxide in our atmosphere.
The U.N. estimates we need to spend 76 trillion to achieve that!! How much do you think we need to spend?
Brooks insisted that sea level had been rising continuously since the dawn of man. Homo Sapiens appeared on Earth 200,000 years ago. Here are the data.
That look like a continuous rise to any of you?
Pretty chart, but where is the link?