Remember when the left maintained it was "frightening" to even talk about questioning elections?

[koshergrl]

Oh wait, that's only when they're sure they're going to win I guess, lol.

Coulter collected a few of the spasms:

"Remember when it was frightening for the losing party not to accept the results of an election? During the third debate, Trump refused to pre-emptively agree to the election results, saying he'd "look at it at the time."

"The media responded in their usual laid-back style:

"A 'HORRIFYING' REPUDIATION OF DEMOCRACY -- The Washington Post, Oct. 20, 2016

"DENIAL OF DEMOCRACY -- Daily News (New York), Oct. 20, 2016 DANGER TO DEMOCRACY -- The Dallas Morning News, Oct. 20, 2016

"ONE SCARY MOMENT; IT ALL BOILED DOWN TO ... DEMOCRACY -- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Oct. 21, 2016

"(Shock) spiked down the nation's spinal column last night and today when the Republican nominee threatened that this little election thing you got there, this little democratic process you've got here, it's nice, it's fine, but he doesn't necessarily plan on abiding by its decision when it comes to the presidency." -- Rachel Maddow, Oct. 20, 2016

"Trump's answer on accepting the outcome of the vote is the most disgraceful statement by a presidential candidate in 160 years." -- Bret Stephens, then-deputy editorial page editor at The Wall Street Journal

"I guess we're all going to have to wait until Nov. 9 to find out if we still have a country -- if Donald Trump is in the mood for a peaceful transfer of power. Or if he's going to wipe his fat a-- with the Constitution." -- CBS's Stephen Colbert, Oct. 19, 2016

"It's unprecedented for a nominee of a major party to themselves signal that they would not accept -- you know, respect the results of an election. We've never had that happen before. ... This really presents a potentially difficult problem for governing ..." -- MSNBC'S Joy Reid, Oct. 22, 2016

"This is very dangerous stuff ... would seriously impair our functioning as a democracy. ... This is about as serious as it gets in the United States." -- CNN's Peter Beinart, Oct. 20, 2016

"Obviously, it's despicable for him to pretend that there's any chance that he would not accept the results of this election; it would be -- in 240 years you've never had anybody do it. ..." -- CNN's Van Jones, Oct. 20, 2016

"Then Trump won, and these very same hysterics refused to accept the results of the election."
June 14, 2017 - THE ‘RESISTANCE' GOES LIVE-FIRE

 

[koshergrl]

"A Florida man is awaiting trial for threatening to lynch the Utah Republican, one of many death threats Chaffetz has seen in recent months."

"Chaffetz wants U.S. marshals to be charged with assessing threats against members of Congress and securing them in more high-profile and widely attended events.

"Chaffetz was the focus of a March death threat in which a Florida man vowed in a voicemail to "hunt your a-- down, wrap a rope around your neck and hang you from a lamppost," according to court records.

"Charles Zachary Howard, of Winter Park, Fla., was charged with a federal felony of threatening to injure another person and is awaiting trial.

"While charging documents refer to the member as "Congressman A," Chaffetz on Wednesday confirmed for the first time that he was the recipient of the threat.

"I suggest you prepare for the battle, motherf----- and the apocalypse," Howard said, according to a probable cause statement filed in federal court."

"...
his March 8 message to Chaffetz was left a day after the congressman's widely reported comment that Americans may have to choose between buying a new iPhone or paying for their own health care, a remark that sparked public outrage and ridicule.

"Howard's attorney Mark O'Brien said in an email that his client, who was medically discharged from the Navy, suffers from a mental health illness, and, at times, his anger "boils over and presents itself in an inappropriate manner."

they are legion.

Congressman's shooting prompts calls for more security, joined by Utah politicians targeted by threats

 

[Weatherman2020]

At least it's Patriotic to question the President again.

 

[mamooth]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

 

[koshergrl]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

So what are the protests about?

I could have sworn they are all about contesting the election results....just as the ridiculous obstruction of justice nonsense is.

 

[Dschrute3]

That's when they thought for sure they were gonna win.

 

[candycorn]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

So what are the protests about?

I could have sworn they are all about contesting the election results....just as the ridiculous obstruction of justice nonsense is.

What protests?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

Send me a dollar for every 'not my President' statement I find on the Internet?

 

[mamooth]

So what are the protests about?

Like he said, what protests?

I could have sworn they are all about contesting the election results....just as the ridiculous obstruction of justice nonsense is.

Who's protesting about election results?

Who ever protested about election results?

You Trump-snowflakes just live in an alternate reality.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

So what are the protests about?

I could have sworn they are all about contesting the election results....just as the ridiculous obstruction of justice nonsense is.

What protests?

Ignorance is a common trait among the left.

‘Not my president’: Thousands protest Trump in rallies across the U.S.

 

[OldLady]

Oh wait, that's only when they're sure they're going to win I guess, lol.

Coulter collected a few of the spasms:

"Remember when it was frightening for the losing party not to accept the results of an election? During the third debate, Trump refused to pre-emptively agree to the election results, saying he'd "look at it at the time."

"The media responded in their usual laid-back style:

"A 'HORRIFYING' REPUDIATION OF DEMOCRACY -- The Washington Post, Oct. 20, 2016

"DENIAL OF DEMOCRACY -- Daily News (New York), Oct. 20, 2016 DANGER TO DEMOCRACY -- The Dallas Morning News, Oct. 20, 2016

"ONE SCARY MOMENT; IT ALL BOILED DOWN TO ... DEMOCRACY -- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Oct. 21, 2016

"(Shock) spiked down the nation's spinal column last night and today when the Republican nominee threatened that this little election thing you got there, this little democratic process you've got here, it's nice, it's fine, but he doesn't necessarily plan on abiding by its decision when it comes to the presidency." -- Rachel Maddow, Oct. 20, 2016

"Trump's answer on accepting the outcome of the vote is the most disgraceful statement by a presidential candidate in 160 years." -- Bret Stephens, then-deputy editorial page editor at The Wall Street Journal

"I guess we're all going to have to wait until Nov. 9 to find out if we still have a country -- if Donald Trump is in the mood for a peaceful transfer of power. Or if he's going to wipe his fat a-- with the Constitution." -- CBS's Stephen Colbert, Oct. 19, 2016

"It's unprecedented for a nominee of a major party to themselves signal that they would not accept -- you know, respect the results of an election. We've never had that happen before. ... This really presents a potentially difficult problem for governing ..." -- MSNBC'S Joy Reid, Oct. 22, 2016

"This is very dangerous stuff ... would seriously impair our functioning as a democracy. ... This is about as serious as it gets in the United States." -- CNN's Peter Beinart, Oct. 20, 2016

"Obviously, it's despicable for him to pretend that there's any chance that he would not accept the results of this election; it would be -- in 240 years you've never had anybody do it. ..." -- CNN's Van Jones, Oct. 20, 2016

"Then Trump won, and these very same hysterics refused to accept the results of the election."
June 14, 2017 - THE ‘RESISTANCE' GOES LIVE-FIRE

That is pretty funny. I remember that.

 

[The Original Tree]

Oh wait, that's only when they're sure they're going to win I guess, lol.

Coulter collected a few of the spasms:

"Remember when it was frightening for the losing party not to accept the results of an election? During the third debate, Trump refused to pre-emptively agree to the election results, saying he'd "look at it at the time."

"The media responded in their usual laid-back style:

"A 'HORRIFYING' REPUDIATION OF DEMOCRACY -- The Washington Post, Oct. 20, 2016

"DENIAL OF DEMOCRACY -- Daily News (New York), Oct. 20, 2016 DANGER TO DEMOCRACY -- The Dallas Morning News, Oct. 20, 2016

"ONE SCARY MOMENT; IT ALL BOILED DOWN TO ... DEMOCRACY -- Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, Oct. 21, 2016

"(Shock) spiked down the nation's spinal column last night and today when the Republican nominee threatened that this little election thing you got there, this little democratic process you've got here, it's nice, it's fine, but he doesn't necessarily plan on abiding by its decision when it comes to the presidency." -- Rachel Maddow, Oct. 20, 2016

"Trump's answer on accepting the outcome of the vote is the most disgraceful statement by a presidential candidate in 160 years." -- Bret Stephens, then-deputy editorial page editor at The Wall Street Journal

"I guess we're all going to have to wait until Nov. 9 to find out if we still have a country -- if Donald Trump is in the mood for a peaceful transfer of power. Or if he's going to wipe his fat a-- with the Constitution." -- CBS's Stephen Colbert, Oct. 19, 2016

"It's unprecedented for a nominee of a major party to themselves signal that they would not accept -- you know, respect the results of an election. We've never had that happen before. ... This really presents a potentially difficult problem for governing ..." -- MSNBC'S Joy Reid, Oct. 22, 2016

"This is very dangerous stuff ... would seriously impair our functioning as a democracy. ... This is about as serious as it gets in the United States." -- CNN's Peter Beinart, Oct. 20, 2016

"Obviously, it's despicable for him to pretend that there's any chance that he would not accept the results of this election; it would be -- in 240 years you've never had anybody do it. ..." -- CNN's Van Jones, Oct. 20, 2016

"Then Trump won, and these very same hysterics refused to accept the results of the election."
June 14, 2017 - THE ‘RESISTANCE' GOES LIVE-FIRE

They are so phucking OBVIOUS. You could almost see them formulating their conspiracies right then. They are Amoebic in their attacks. This is why they have No INTEGRITY. You can never believe anything a Liberal ever says, because their morality is fluid and ambiguous. They practice situation ethics.
You can never hold a liberal to their word because as soon as a situation changes, their stance on it changes, which essentially makes them pathological and habitual liars.

 

[OldLady]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

Ummmm....a lot of people want him impeached. A lot of people think the Russians won him the vote. A lot of people are carrying signs saying "Not my President." You can't deny this one, I'm afraid. That was pretty funny. The horror of the moment when Trump wouldn't agree to accept the election results. I don't mind taking that one. It's true.

 

[usmbguest5318]

Remember when the left maintained it was "frightening" to even talk about questioning elections?

• Well, what election outcome is anyone who matters indeed questioning? I'm sure you can find peons and "peanut gallery" members who question an election's result. Assuming you've come across the expressed thoughts of such individuals, why does what they say merit your dignifying their inanity with a thread about what they've said?
• Do you realize the difference between questioning something and declaring it to be "whatever?" Questioning things, and then seeking the answers to their questions, is what keen thinkers routinely do. The better and more consistently one aptly does so, the better the quality of one's conclusions about "stuff."

 

[Michael68]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

So what are the protests about?

I could have sworn they are all about contesting the election results....just as the ridiculous obstruction of justice nonsense is.

What protests?

Ignorance is a common trait among the left.

‘Not my president’: Thousands protest Trump in rallies across the U.S.

They have selective memory. Its also what this Russia BS is all about. If they can't win the election, they will falsely charge him and hope that works. So, yes, the dummiecrats and libtards do not accept the results of the election after all their doom and gloom about Trump not accepting the results!

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

Ummmm....a lot of people want him impeached. A lot of people think the Russians won him the vote. A lot of people are carrying signs saying "Not my President." You can't deny this one, I'm afraid. That was pretty funny. The horror of the moment when Trump wouldn't agree to accept the election results. I don't mind taking that one. It's true.

Yep, there a lot of very strange people for sure. And BTW, Trump never said he wouldn't accept the results of the election.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

"...Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he might not accept the results of next month’s election if he felt it was rigged against him"

 

[OldLady]

Try to understand. We're not like you. We're not whiny hypocrites who lie about everything.

Nobody is questioning that Trump is President. Why do you Trump-snowflakes keep lying about that?

Ummmm....a lot of people want him impeached. A lot of people think the Russians won him the vote. A lot of people are carrying signs saying "Not my President." You can't deny this one, I'm afraid. That was pretty funny. The horror of the moment when Trump wouldn't agree to accept the election results. I don't mind taking that one. It's true.

Yep, there a lot of very strange people for sure. And BTW, Trump never said he wouldn't accept the results of the election.

I remember the entire kerfluffle quite well, including Trump's equivocating.

 

[OldLady]

"...Donald J. Trump said Wednesday that he might not accept the results of next month’s election if he felt it was rigged against him"

Yes, and even though he won, he's spending tax dollars looking to see if it was "rigged" by the illegals. But not the Russians, who all the intelligence agencies have told him did.