Discussion in 'Politics' started by Darkwind, Sep 17, 2012.
It really is just this basic.
Well that sure clears up the angst over taxpayers footing the bill for a prisoner's sex change operation.
you understand that the federalist papers was kind of like the blog of its day, right.
it isn't law. it's just political discussion.
the federalist papers aren't the constitution.
thanks for playing.
No one said they are moron. It's about the day. See the word "Constitution"? Stick your thanks up your shit filled ass! I hear an ambulance siren that you can bark at and chase.
Are you suggesting that it's wrong?
She's a one sentence idiot that everyone laughs at. Pay her no mind. She does her best work in the Flame Zone. She gets off on insulting people and being nasty. She reaps what she sows.
The Federalist Papers are a series of 85 articles or essays promoting the ratification of the United States Constitution written by Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay. Seventy-seven of the essays were published serially in The Independent Journal and The New York Packet between October 1787 and August 1788. A compilation of these and eight others, called The Federalist; or, The New Constitution, was published in two volumes in 1788 by J. and A. McLean. The series' correct title is The Federalist; the title The Federalist Papers did not emerge until the twentieth century
Not just "Blog Political Discussion" but discussion by two actual signers of the Constitution, the third being John Jay.
Nor did OP say they were. There were a series of articles arguing the benefits and justification of creating and signing the Constitution.
OP is correct in stating that the Constitution limits GOVERNMENT not PEOPLE, but you didn't like that (because it's true) so you tried to minimize the historical significance of the Federalist Papers by equating it to a simple mindless blog. Well it isn't.
You do understand that the Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government and not the power of the people.
Separate names with a comma.