Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It really is just this basic.
the federalist papers aren't the constitution.
thanks for playing.
Are you suggesting that it's wrong?
the federalist papers aren't the constitution.
thanks for playing.
Not just "Blog Political Discussion" but discussion by two actual signers of the Constitution, the third being John Jay.you understand that the federalist papers was kind of like the blog of its day, right. it isn't law. it's just political discussion.
Nor did OP say they were. There were a series of articles arguing the benefits and justification of creating and signing the Constitution.the federalist papers aren't the constitution. thanks for playing.
You do understand that the Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government and not the power of the people.It really is just this basic.
you understand that the federalist papers was kind of like the blog of its day, right.
it isn't law. it's just political discussion.
You do understand that the Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government and not the power of the people.It really is just this basic.
you understand that the federalist papers was kind of like the blog of its day, right.
it isn't law. it's just political discussion.
right?
You do understand that the Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government and not the power of the people.you understand that the federalist papers was kind of like the blog of its day, right.
it isn't law. it's just political discussion.
right?
No, she doesn't get it. She's like a big Doe-Doe bird flying around directionless shitting on everyone's lawns, cars, etc.. In other words, she's meaningless except for the giant stinking pile of shit she leaves behind.
You do understand that the Constitution limits the power of the Federal Government and not the power of the people.
right?
No, she doesn't get it. She's like a big Doe-Doe bird flying around directionless shitting on everyone's lawns, cars, etc.. In other words, she's meaningless except for the giant stinking pile of shit she leaves behind.
Careful! She's a "lawyer".
No, she doesn't get it. She's like a big Doe-Doe bird flying around directionless shitting on everyone's lawns, cars, etc.. In other words, she's meaningless except for the giant stinking pile of shit she leaves behind.
Careful! She's a "lawyer".
Yea right..Ok. The game of Life doesn't count. Real law degree's require actual research to include case law and that annoying thing liberals despise, THE US CONSTITUTION.
It really is just this basic.
theyt often misquote the 'general welfare' clause of the Constitution as if that alone is the sole key to limitless power exercised by the Federal Government.It really is just this basic.
One thing I've never heard a modern liberal/Progressive/Dem explain using any logic or reason is this: If you believe the Constitution allows all this government meddling in markets and liberty, what exactly is the point of having clearly enumerated powers and the 10th amendment?
Anyone?
theyt often misquote the 'general welfare' clause of the Constitution as if that alone is the sole key to limitless power exercised by the Federal Government.It really is just this basic.
One thing I've never heard a modern liberal/Progressive/Dem explain using any logic or reason is this: If you believe the Constitution allows all this government meddling in markets and liberty, what exactly is the point of having clearly enumerated powers and the 10th amendment?
Anyone?
They are, of course, wrong.
It really is just this basic.
One thing I've never heard a modern liberal/Progressive/Dem explain using any logic or reason is this: If you believe the Constitution allows all this government meddling in markets and liberty, what exactly is the point of having clearly enumerated powers and the 10th amendment?
Anyone?
It really is just this basic.
One thing I've never heard a modern liberal/Progressive/Dem explain using any logic or reason is this: If you believe the Constitution allows all this government meddling in markets and liberty, what exactly is the point of having clearly enumerated powers and the 10th amendment?
Anyone?
The answer isn't that hard. You forgot to say the magic word.
It really is just this basic.
Reagan, Ronald, Governor of California, Inauguration Address, January 5, 1967, retrieved December 11, 2011 from Ronald Reagan Presidential Library, National Archives and Records AdministrationPerhaps you and I have lived with this miracle too long to be properly appreciative. Freedom is a fragile thing and is never more than one generation away from extinction. It is not ours by inheritance; it must be fought for and defended constantly by each generation, for it comes only once to a people. Those who have known freedom and then lost it have never known it again.
Knowing this, it is hard to explain those who even today would question the people’s capacity for self-rule.182 […] Government is the people’s business, and every man, woman and child becomes a shareholder with the first penny of tax paid
With all the profound wording of the Constitution, probably the most meaningful words are the first three, ―We, the People.‖ […] We are of the people, chosen by them to see that no permanent structure of government ever encroaches on freedom or assumes a power beyond that freely granted by the people.