Reagan Said It Best

[DaGoose]

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Isn't "trying to change the topic" what daveman was doing when he tried to change it from Reagan to Unions?

 

[daveman]

I don't understand how daveman can fault Obama on the bailout when it was...

1) Such a huge success

and

2) His hero Reagan (you know, the liar with all the scandals) did the same thing with the Chrysler bailout.

The bailout has been a rousing success, and that's the business press talking.

Thanks to the government intervention, General Motors is out of bankruptcy and again turning profits. Chrysler is stabilized. Last April, GM paid back its loan in full and with interest years ahead of schedule.

Yet many tea party/Republican politicians persist in portraying this story as one of government overreach forced on good Americans by Washington socialists. They totally forget the economic mayhem that was gripping the country. Or perhaps they simply welcome any opportunity to bash unions.

The $86-billion bailout was a gamble, all right, but it was a bet that America won. And it was won not through dumb luck but the administration's skilled management of the bankruptcy. And the good news keeps coming. At the last count, the bailout's actual cost to taxpayers has fallen to $17 billion, according to the Detroit News.

What Was Wrong With the Auto Bailout? Nothing by Froma Harrop on Creators.com - A Syndicate Of Talent

And the bailout was started by BUSH....

Bush Approves Auto Industry Bailout - The Consumerist

Now, dumbshit, you get to show where I said the bailouts were a good thing. Hint: You can't use faxes from the union hall as proof. It has to be something I wrote, not something you were programmed with.

You make this so easy it's laughable. One of these days you'll learn some reading comprehension.

I never claimed that you "said the bailouts were a good thing" you dumbass. Quite the opposite.

And then you started your classic flanking maneuver by going after my support of Unions to try and change the subject since once again you're getting your ass handed to you.

Good job!!!

Ahhh. So you admit the extent of what you're using instead of logic is:

Reagan and Bush did a bailout. They were conservatives. Daveman is a conservative. Therefore, he should think bailouts are good.

I know this will come as a shock to you, since you're part of a hive mind, but conservatives can think for themselves. I don't care what others think about bailouts. There is no such thing as "too big to fail" as far as I'm concerned.

 

[daveman]

Apparently not too many since the ones I posted are generally accepted as major indicators of the state of the economy (excepting the approval rating)

How many did you have to look through before you gave up?

And in regards to your stat, keep in mind that Reagan inherited an EXPANDING economy that didn't go into recession until July of 1981,

6 months AFTER Reagan took office.

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

Congratulations. You win one internetz.

You've decided you won. It's not like there's anything I could present that would sway you.

So, whoopty-doo.

 

[daveman]

Apparently not too many since the ones I posted are generally accepted as major indicators of the state of the economy (excepting the approval rating)

How many did you have to look through before you gave up?

And in regards to your stat, keep in mind that Reagan inherited an EXPANDING economy that didn't go into recession until July of 1981,

6 months AFTER Reagan took office.

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

Is that what Carb said? Where?

It's leftist canon.

I explained early in this thread why leftists hate Reagan. So far, no one's made a case otherwise.

 

[daveman]

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Isn't "trying to change the topic" what daveman was doing when he tried to change it from Reagan to Unions?

In case you haven't noticed, union drone, I discuss unions whenever I talk to you, because you're a union drone.

Don't like it? Try thinking for yourself for a change.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Then you prove that things were better for Reagan in November of 82 than they are now.

Or STFU.

 

[The Rabbi]

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Then you prove that things were better for Reagan in November of 82 than they are now.

Or STFU.

Sure.
In 1982 he would be re-elected in 2 years.
In 2012 Obama will not be re-elected.
Pretty simple. QED.
Now go leave the adults alone.

 

[NYcarbineer]

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Then you prove that things were better for Reagan in November of 82 than they are now.

Or STFU.

Sure.
In 1982 he would be re-elected in 2 years.
In 2012 Obama will not be re-elected.
Pretty simple. QED.
Now go leave the adults alone.

In other words, you can't. You could have saved time and energy typing 'I can't'.

 

[The Rabbi]

Then you prove that things were better for Reagan in November of 82 than they are now.

Or STFU.

Sure.
In 1982 he would be re-elected in 2 years.
In 2012 Obama will not be re-elected.
Pretty simple. QED.
Now go leave the adults alone.

In other words, you can't. You could have saved time and energy typing 'I can't'.

I did. You asked a question. I answered it. That you didn't like my answer because it contradicts your pre-conceived notions is not my fault.

 

[HUGGY]

Reagan Said It Best

Clown boy...

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p5D6RnMbfHI&feature=related[/ame]

 

[georgephillip]

Reagan and Pakistan...

"Chomsky is trying to rescue crimes from the memory-hole.

" He explains that Ronald Reagan -- the great hero of the US right -- was a great champion of jihadism.

"It was Reagan who encouraged Pakistan simultaneously to become fundamentalist, and acquire nuclear weapons.

"Chomsky coolly condemns 'the global jihad launched by Zia and Reagan,' for geopolitical reasons, with no concern for the after-effects.

Thanks, Gipper.

Now make a few more funny noises.

Hopes and Prospects

 

[bag]

Longest post-war economic expansion. Yes, it did work out well.

was sending the US economy into record setting debt patriotic also?

 

[MikeK]

Fuck Reagan and all those who worship at his altar.

That's rather succinctly put -- but I agree completely.

 

[DaGoose]

Now, dumbshit, you get to show where I said the bailouts were a good thing. Hint: You can't use faxes from the union hall as proof. It has to be something I wrote, not something you were programmed with.

You make this so easy it's laughable. One of these days you'll learn some reading comprehension.

I never claimed that you "said the bailouts were a good thing" you dumbass. Quite the opposite.

And then you started your classic flanking maneuver by going after my support of Unions to try and change the subject since once again you're getting your ass handed to you.

Good job!!!

Ahhh. So you admit the extent of what you're using instead of logic is:

Reagan and Bush did a bailout. They were conservatives. Daveman is a conservative. Therefore, he should think bailouts are good.

I know this will come as a shock to you, since you're part of a hive mind, but conservatives can think for themselves. I don't care what others think about bailouts. There is no such thing as "too big to fail" as far as I'm concerned.

Bullshit. You failed to comprehend what I wrote. Admit it, bonehead.

No, he refuses to waste time on an ignorant slob like you who cannot stick with a topic or resort to tired worn out old cliches that have been disproven about 100 times on this site alone in the last 2 weeks alone.

Isn't "trying to change the topic" what daveman was doing when he tried to change it from Reagan to Unions?

In case you haven't noticed, union drone, I discuss unions whenever I talk to you, because you're a union drone.

Don't like it? Try thinking for yourself for a change.

You mean except for the last post you aimed at me. Or several other past posts aimed at me where you didn't mention unions? See? I just caught you in another lie.

You just continue proving my point that when you're wrong you simply start LYING and try to change the subject.

 

[DaGoose]

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

Is that what Carb said? Where?

It's leftist canon.

I explained early in this thread why leftists hate Reagan. So far, no one's made a case otherwise.

Hey Liar, you have never showed anyone what made Reagan so great. He was an actor and he carried that right into the WH.

So what is it again that makes you like him?

Is it the FACT that he led one of the most corrupt administrations in history?

Is it the FACT that he had a huge tax increase?

Is it the FACT that he and Nancy made their decisions after consulting with an astrologer?

Is it the FACT that he should have been impeached or in prison due to Iran/Contra?

Is it the FACT that he is ranked pretty low in nearly every POTUS ranking? Which shows that you are in the vast minority of thinking he was anything special.

 

[daveman]

You make this so easy it's laughable. One of these days you'll learn some reading comprehension.

I never claimed that you "said the bailouts were a good thing" you dumbass. Quite the opposite.

And then you started your classic flanking maneuver by going after my support of Unions to try and change the subject since once again you're getting your ass handed to you.

Good job!!!

Ahhh. So you admit the extent of what you're using instead of logic is:

Reagan and Bush did a bailout. They were conservatives. Daveman is a conservative. Therefore, he should think bailouts are good.

I know this will come as a shock to you, since you're part of a hive mind, but conservatives can think for themselves. I don't care what others think about bailouts. There is no such thing as "too big to fail" as far as I'm concerned.

Bullshit. You failed to comprehend what I wrote. Admit it, bonehead.

You make a statement based on preconceived notions...and it's MY fault.

Isn't "trying to change the topic" what daveman was doing when he tried to change it from Reagan to Unions?

In case you haven't noticed, union drone, I discuss unions whenever I talk to you, because you're a union drone.

Don't like it? Try thinking for yourself for a change.

You mean except for the last post you aimed at me. Or several other past posts aimed at me where you didn't mention unions? See? I just caught you in another lie.

You just continue proving my point that when you're wrong you simply start LYING and try to change the subject.

What's the matter? Doesn't your union health plan cover leftist butthurt?

 

[daveman]

Is that what Carb said? Where?

It's leftist canon.

I explained early in this thread why leftists hate Reagan. So far, no one's made a case otherwise.

Hey Liar, you have never showed anyone what made Reagan so great. He was an actor and he carried that right into the WH.

So what is it again that makes you like him?

Is it the FACT that he led one of the most corrupt administrations in history?

Is it the FACT that he had a huge tax increase?

Is it the FACT that he and Nancy made their decisions after consulting with an astrologer?

Is it the FACT that he should have been impeached or in prison due to Iran/Contra?

Is it the FACT that he is ranked pretty low in nearly every POTUS ranking? Which shows that you are in the vast minority of thinking he was anything special.

Most of your FACTS are in fact opinion. Like a typical leftist, you can't tell the difference.

But as far as POTUS rankings go...you're wrong.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Sure.
In 1982 he would be re-elected in 2 years.
In 2012 Obama will not be re-elected.
Pretty simple. QED.
Now go leave the adults alone.

In other words, you can't. You could have saved time and energy typing 'I can't'.

I did. You asked a question. I answered it. That you didn't like my answer because it contradicts your pre-conceived notions is not my fault.

Your answer, besides having nothing to do with the question, contained its own pre-conceived notion.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Well, you're right. He's evil, and his name should be struck from history.

See, you simply refuse to debate like an adult. And lose like a man.

Congratulations. You win one internetz.

You've decided you won. It's not like there's anything I could present that would sway you.

So, whoopty-doo.

I won the debate because the preponderance of the evidence presented supported my position and refuted yours. That's pretty much how a debate works.

 

[DaGoose]

It's leftist canon.

I explained early in this thread why leftists hate Reagan. So far, no one's made a case otherwise.

Hey Liar, you have never showed anyone what made Reagan so great. He was an actor and he carried that right into the WH.

So what is it again that makes you like him?

Is it the FACT that he led one of the most corrupt administrations in history?

Is it the FACT that he had a huge tax increase?

Is it the FACT that he and Nancy made their decisions after consulting with an astrologer?

Is it the FACT that he should have been impeached or in prison due to Iran/Contra?

Is it the FACT that he is ranked pretty low in nearly every POTUS ranking? Which shows that you are in the vast minority of thinking he was anything special.

Most of your FACTS are in fact opinion. Like a typical leftist, you can't tell the difference.

But as far as POTUS rankings go...you're wrong.

Uhh........they ARE FACTS. Which is only confirmed by your inability to disprove them.

And only a dumbass like you would post an old poll to try and make your point. Here you go....

C-SPAN Survey of Presidential Leadership - Overall Ranking - C-SPAN

A new poll of leading presidential scholars ranks Barack Obama as the 15th best president of the United States, just below Bill Clinton but ahead of Ronald Reagan.

Professors rank President Obama 15th best president - Emily Schultheis - POLITICO.com