Re-Evaluating Newt..

[SAT2]

I admitted they don't piss away money on bullshit. I'm sorry you can't get your arms around the concept.

I think I'm starting to understand the Solyndra screwup better, though.

You admitted that the school wasn't charged rent. Remember?

Noooooo, I admitted the schools are owned by the church. Just like the Pubic Schools are owned by the School district. One is paid for by tuition, the other paid for by taxes.

Man, are you like some kind of high functioning retard or something?

You said that the Catholic schools were not charged rent.

Public schools have to pay for their own buildings.

That's a significant expense.

 

[JoeB131]

You said that the Catholic schools were not charged rent.

Public schools have to pay for their own buildings.

That's a significant expense.

SO essenitally, you are here whining that the schools are wasting money paying rent on buildings they already own, right?

Again, my point is, if you spend $12,000 and you get a kid who is dumber than the kid you spent $6000 on, then the $12,000 was wasted.

 

[SAT2]

You said that the Catholic schools were not charged rent.

Public schools have to pay for their own buildings.

That's a significant expense.

SO essenitally, you are here whining that the schools are wasting money paying rent on buildings they already own, right?

Again, my point is, if you spend $12,000 and you get a kid who is dumber than the kid you spent $6000 on, then the $12,000 was wasted.

It's a subsidy from the church. You have a massive subsidy that you want to tap dance around.

 

[JoeB131]

You said that the Catholic schools were not charged rent.

Public schools have to pay for their own buildings.

That's a significant expense.

SO essenitally, you are here whining that the schools are wasting money paying rent on buildings they already own, right?

Again, my point is, if you spend $12,000 and you get a kid who is dumber than the kid you spent $6000 on, then the $12,000 was wasted.

It's a subsidy from the church. You have a massive subsidy that you want to tap dance around.

It's a subsidy from the Government. you have a massive subsidy that you piss away, and you tap dance around.

 

[SAT2]

SO essenitally, you are here whining that the schools are wasting money paying rent on buildings they already own, right?

Again, my point is, if you spend $12,000 and you get a kid who is dumber than the kid you spent $6000 on, then the $12,000 was wasted.

It's a subsidy from the church. You have a massive subsidy that you want to tap dance around.

It's a subsidy from the Government. you have a massive subsidy that you piss away, and you tap dance around.

The cost is included in your per-pupil number for the public schools, and not in the private schools.

 

[Lumpy 1]

Hows Newt Doing....?

 

[JoeB131]

It's a subsidy from the church. You have a massive subsidy that you want to tap dance around.

It's a subsidy from the Government. you have a massive subsidy that you piss away, and you tap dance around.

The cost is included in your per-pupil number for the public schools, and not in the private schools.

Actually, they aren't... and I doubt that number is really all that much to start with.

Do you have figures proving this, because, honestly, you talk a lot, but you never put up figures.

 

[SAT2]

It's a subsidy from the Government. you have a massive subsidy that you piss away, and you tap dance around.

The cost is included in your per-pupil number for the public schools, and not in the private schools.

Actually, they aren't... and I doubt that number is really all that much to start with.

Do you have figures proving this, because, honestly, you talk a lot, but you never put up figures.

You put up figures. I contested them. Your defense of those figures has been to lob insults and make generalized complaints.

 

[Lumpy 1]

SAT2 & JoeB131 sitting in a tree...

 

[JoeB131]

The cost is included in your per-pupil number for the public schools, and not in the private schools.

Actually, they aren't... and I doubt that number is really all that much to start with.

Do you have figures proving this, because, honestly, you talk a lot, but you never put up figures.

You put up figures. I contested them. Your defense of those figures has been to lob insults and make generalized complaints.

Exactly. I put up figures, and you put out some bullshit that the Public Schools are paying for buildings (that were built a long time ago) and the Catholic Schools aren't..because, um, the Church provided those buidlings... or something.

 

[SAT2]

The Republican establishment has started attacking Newt as a bomb thrower.

 

[JoeB131]

SAT2 & JoeB131 sitting in a tree...

Oh, I agree, it's tiresome, because he keeps making the same argument over and over and over...

 

[JoeB131]

The Republican establishment has started attacking Newt as a bomb thrower.

Which will probably make him more popular with the GOP Grassroots.

I think the Beltway establishment doesn't understand that down here in "flyover country", we are as sick of them as we are of the Democrats.

 

[SAT2]

[Exactly. I put up figures, and you put out some bullshit that the Public Schools are paying for buildings (that were built a long time ago) and the Catholic Schools aren't..because, um, the Church provided those buidlings... or something.

You've long since admitted that the Catholic Church subsidizes their schools, so give it up. I also gave a list of other costs faced by public schools, and your response was basically that the poor kids and disabled kids were shit out of luck.

 

[SAT2]

The Republican establishment has started attacking Newt as a bomb thrower.

Which will probably make him more popular with the GOP Grassroots.

I think the Beltway establishment doesn't understand that down here in "flyover country", we are as sick of them as we are of the Democrats.

I sure hope you get your way.

 

[JoeB131]

[Exactly. I put up figures, and you put out some bullshit that the Public Schools are paying for buildings (that were built a long time ago) and the Catholic Schools aren't..because, um, the Church provided those buidlings... or something.

You've long since admitted that the Catholic Church subsidizes their schools, so give it up. I also gave a list of other costs faced by public schools, and your response was basically that the poor kids and disabled kids were shit out of luck.

So essentially, they never bothered to teach you reading comprehension during your "democratizing" experience in Public school?

 

[SAT2]

[Exactly. I put up figures, and you put out some bullshit that the Public Schools are paying for buildings (that were built a long time ago) and the Catholic Schools aren't..because, um, the Church provided those buidlings... or something.

You've long since admitted that the Catholic Church subsidizes their schools, so give it up. I also gave a list of other costs faced by public schools, and your response was basically that the poor kids and disabled kids were shit out of luck.

So essentially, they never bothered to teach you reading comprehension during your "democratizing" experience in Public school?

Unfortunately for you and the wingnut world, that's exactly what they taught me.

 

[Lumpy 1]

I just wondered if Democrats were embarrassed by these repeated vicious media attacks on Newt...?

 

[The T]

I just wondered if Democrats were embarrassed by these repeated vicious media attacks on Newt...?

Why should they be? They can't compete in the arena of discussion/ideas...just character asassinations. It's the only way they ever get anywhere.

 

[Jackson]

stealing is unethical, right up noots alley.

newt, delay, norquist.


hahahaha

Jon Stewart said it about Ted Kennedy. But it works for Newt, too!

it looks like he needs to be newtered after all.

and after all that training in lobbying he still sucks at pr.

Do you even know what a consultant is?