Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I didn't realize Bill Clinton was impeached for adultery? I thought it was because he lied to a grand jury and used his office to influence others to lie? Amazing what you can learn on the internet
Technically, you are right.
Practically, nobody cared.
Because every MAN in this country would have told the exact same lie if asked.
People forgave Clinton for the lying because the question never should have been asked in the first place.
Just like they thought the "hi-tech" lynching of Clarance Thomas was wrong 7 years earlier.
Interrogating people about their sex lives isnt' kosher to a lot of people.
Now, in the interest of complete fairness, Clinton brought most of his troubles down on himself. He should have settled with Paula Jones years earlier. And he got a whole lot of millage out of sexual harrassment BS at the time of the Thomas hearings.
But all the real damage was done when Lewinsky's name came out. By pressing the issue, the Republicans made themselves look bad.
I didn't realize Bill Clinton was impeached for adultery? I thought it was because he lied to a grand jury and used his office to influence others to lie? Amazing what you can learn on the internet
Technically, you are right.
Practically, nobody cared.
Because every MAN in this country would have told the exact same lie if asked.
People forgave Clinton for the lying because the question never should have been asked in the first place.
Just like they thought the "hi-tech" lynching of Clarance Thomas was wrong 7 years earlier.
Interrogating people about their sex lives isnt' kosher to a lot of people.
Now, in the interest of complete fairness, Clinton brought most of his troubles down on himself. He should have settled with Paula Jones years earlier. And he got a whole lot of millage out of sexual harrassment BS at the time of the Thomas hearings.
But all the real damage was done when Lewinsky's name came out. By pressing the issue, the Republicans made themselves look bad.
I find it interesting that you probscribe your personal values to "practically" everybody. I would suggest that a few more than "nobody" cared. Using executive privelege to lure women into sexual relationships is at best, sleazy...At worst, corrupt. Maybe a few of the problems in this country are caused by people who give a pass to the sleazy and corrupt?
By far the best debater and most informed candidate and could easily kick Obama's ass in a debate...
Turned Clinton from a deficit spending President in a fortunate economy to a budget surplus and Democrat sexual harassment hero..
Soo.. what's your beef with this Guy...?
Well if you must ask lumpy.......................
By far the best debater and most informed candidate and could easily kick Obama's ass in a debate...
Turned Clinton from a deficit spending President in a fortunate economy to a budget surplus and Democrat pro-sexual harassment hero..
Soo.. what's your beef with this Guy...?
When "the best debater" and "most informed candidate" can't even convince his own campaign manager and spokesman to stay with his campaign at this early date - then something is definitely wrong!Newt Gingrich: 2012 Campaign Staff Exodus Makes Me 'Feel Liberated'
06/15/11
Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said during an appearance on Fox News on Tuesday night that he feels "liberated" by the mass exodus of staffers from his presidential campaign.
Last week, news of aides jumping ship from the Gingrich 2012 political operation sent shockwaves across the political spectrum. Campaign manager Rob Johnson and spokesman Rick Tyler were just two of numerous members of the presidential candidate's team to resign.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/06/15/newt-gingrich-2012-campaign-liberated_n_877333.html
I find it interesting that you probscribe your personal values to "practically" everybody. I would suggest that a few more than "nobody" cared. Using executive privelege to lure women into sexual relationships is at best, sleazy...At worst, corrupt. Maybe a few of the problems in this country are caused by people who give a pass to the sleazy and corrupt?
I think Newt and Ron Paul should find where they agree and push the others out of the way... Then let the best man win.
...your main problem is your utter inability to understand anything that goes on around you. No one gave a shit about President Horndog fucking around on his wife. Oh, yeah, like that was really shocking and unexpected. We, and Newt, had a problem with him BREAKING THE LAW WHILE HE DID IT. I realize, however, that laws are just suggestions and not to be taken seriously to the leftists.
Your main problem is your utter inability to understand anything that goes on around you. No one gave a shit about President Horndog fucking around on his wife. Oh, yeah, like that was really shocking and unexpected. We, and Newt, had a problem with him BREAKING THE LAW WHILE HE DID IT. I realize, however, that laws are just suggestions and not to be taken seriously to the leftists.
And your main problem is that you believe such nonsense. Newt cared about getting the President by any means possible. The impeachment was over Clinton's lying about a matter tangential to the charges against him. Clinton wasn't accused of having an affair with Lewinsky, or of sexually harassing Lewinsky. Clinton was being deposed on the Paula Jones accusation, why was he even being questioned about Lewinsky?
I realize, however, that the most revolting hypocrisy is acceptable to the far right, as long as a candidate shares their teabagging rhetoric.
[Not really, I just wanted to make fun of your grandstanding and pitiful excuse making for attacking Clinton while defending Newt.]
By far the best debater and most informed candidate and could easily kick Obama's ass in a debate...
Turned Clinton from a deficit spending President in a fortunate economy to a budget surplus and Democrat sexual harassment hero..
Soo.. what's your beef with this Guy...?
Well if you must ask lumpy.......................
Big Deal--there is no politician that is PER...FECT. All of them have made mistakes and this one is on Newt. He still far outweighs the others as the true statesman out of the bunch--and he could clean Obama's clock in any debate--and everyone knows it.
To be fair, any litigant in a civil court would be asked the same kind of questions. Except most companies settle and fire the offender long before it ever gets that far.
I've seen people fired for jokes and rude comments, much less what clinton was accused of doing.
To be fair, any litigant in a civil court would be asked the same kind of questions. Except most companies settle and fire the offender long before it ever gets that far.
I've seen people fired for jokes and rude comments, much less what clinton was accused of doing.
Jokes and rude comments are not high crimes nor misdemeanors. We're talking about throwing the nation into a constitutional crisis for the sake of bringing down a political opponent by a SERIES of people who had engaged in sex outside marriage and/or consensual sex with their subordinates.
To be fair, any litigant in a civil court would be asked the same kind of questions. Except most companies settle and fire the offender long before it ever gets that far.
I've seen people fired for jokes and rude comments, much less what clinton was accused of doing.
Jokes and rude comments are not high crimes nor misdemeanors. We're talking about throwing the nation into a constitutional crisis for the sake of bringing down a political opponent by a SERIES of people who had engaged in sex outside marriage and/or consensual sex with their subordinates.
To be fair, any litigant in a civil court would be asked the same kind of questions. Except most companies settle and fire the offender long before it ever gets that far.
I've seen people fired for jokes and rude comments, much less what clinton was accused of doing.
Jokes and rude comments are not high crimes nor misdemeanors. We're talking about throwing the nation into a constitutional crisis for the sake of bringing down a political opponent by a SERIES of people who had engaged in sex outside marriage and/or consensual sex with their subordinates.
Oh brother.....................
I am sure glad the saving and loan scandal went away, we didnt want any democrats to be prosecuted. And the way democrats would rather sit in jail then talk was so organized crime-ish HAT TIP GUYS No side makes better criminals then democrats.
To be fair, any litigant in a civil court would be asked the same kind of questions. Except most companies settle and fire the offender long before it ever gets that far.
I've seen people fired for jokes and rude comments, much less what clinton was accused of doing.
Jokes and rude comments are not high crimes nor misdemeanors. We're talking about throwing the nation into a constitutional crisis for the sake of bringing down a political opponent by a SERIES of people who had engaged in sex outside marriage and/or consensual sex with their subordinates.
Yes we are.... but democrats ceded their right to whine about it when they put serial liar Anita Hill up as a model of feminist heroine.
Clinton got hoist on his own petard, he doesn't deserve a lot of sympathy....
And neither does Newt.
Oh, give it up. Hill was telling the truth.
By far the best debater and most informed candidate and could easily kick Obama's ass in a debate...
Turned Clinton from a deficit spending President in a fortunate economy to a budget surplus and Democrat pro-sexual harassment hero..
Soo.. what's your beef with this Guy...?
Don't have one. He's already my choice, assuming he's still in by the time my state's primary rolls around.
I didn't realize Bill Clinton was impeached for adultery? I thought it was because he lied to a grand jury and used his office to influence others to lie? Amazing what you can learn on the internet
Technically, you are right.
Practically, nobody cared.
Because every MAN in this country would have told the exact same lie if asked.
People forgave Clinton for the lying because the question never should have been asked in the first place.
Just like they thought the "hi-tech" lynching of Clarance Thomas was wrong 7 years earlier.
Interrogating people about their sex lives isnt' kosher to a lot of people.
Now, in the interest of complete fairness, Clinton brought most of his troubles down on himself. He should have settled with Paula Jones years earlier. And he got a whole lot of millage out of sexual harrassment BS at the time of the Thomas hearings.
But all the real damage was done when Lewinsky's name came out. By pressing the issue, the Republicans made themselves look bad.
I find it interesting that you probscribe your personal values to "practically" everybody. I would suggest that a few more than "nobody" cared. Using executive privelege to lure women into sexual relationships is at best, sleazy...At worst, corrupt. Maybe a few of the problems in this country are caused by people who give a pass to the sleazy and corrupt?
Back to my boy, Newt. I LOVE hearing him talk in these debates. He makes the other candidates sound like a bunch of kids squabbling over the last Popsicle. Check out the way Newt discussed Herman Cain's 999 plan. He started by commending and complimenting Cain, and then raised objections to the plan without ONCE denigrating Cain, or even sounding like he was denigrating the plan. He sounds so statesmanlike.
I've been following his website postings about the legislation he would propose as President. It's really good, and quite innovative in places. And I like his plan for his first Executive Order as President to be abolishing all "czars" in the federal government.
You like intelligence and a President who speaks in full sentences? We agree.
But.....then you say you like the plan to abolish czars. Don't you know that this is just a piece of grandstanding nonsense?