Ramadi: Obama's Shame

CrusaderFrank

Diamond Member
May 20, 2009
144,646
67,147
2,330
Ramadi was the site of several major battles between the US an AQ and it's offshoots. At the end, local Iraqi cooperation and assistance back by US firepower quelled the Insurgence

""Raider" Brigade takes over Ramadi[edit]
In January 2007, the 1st Brigade Combat Team, 3rd Infantry Division, on its third tour to Iraq, arrived in Ramadi and assumed responsibility from Macfarland's brigade on February 18 at a transfer ceremony at Camp Ramadi. During the ceremony, which was attended by Sheikh Sattar, MacFarland said that his brigade had lost 86 soldiers, sailors and Marines during the 8 month campaign (though the Brigade had spent a total of nearly 17 months in Iraq).[43][44]

In January 2007, Ramadi averaged approximately 35 enemy attacks on US forces per day. Following heavy fighting over an 8-week campaign, which was led by a Task Force commanded by 1st Brigade, 3rd ID, also known as Task Force Raider, attacks in the brigade's area of operations dropped to one or two per day within the city of Ramadi. In the early months of 2007, 3-69 Armor Battalion, in conjunction with two Marine Battalions, along with TF PathFinder was largely responsible for securing Southern and Central Ramadi. By August 2007, Ramadi had gone 80 consecutive days without a single attack on US forces and the 1st BDE, 3rd ID commander commander, Colonel John Charlton, stated, "...al-Qaida is defeated in Al Anbar". However, despite 1-3 ID's effectiveness, insurgents continued to launch attacks on Ramadi and the surrounding areas in the weeks and months to follow. On June 30, 2007, a group of between 50 and 60 insurgents attempting to infiltrate Ramadi were intercepted and destroyed, following a tip from Iraqi Police officers. The insurgents were intercepted by elements of the 1st Battalion, 77th Armor on 30 June 2007 and on 1 July 2007 they were destroyed by elements of Bravo company, 2nd Squad, 1st platoon, 1-18 Infantry Regiment. 1-18 operated out of the Ta'Meem district of Ramadi's western sector. North of Ramadi, elements of 3-69 Armor, whose headquarters had been moved north of Ramadi, engaged elements of al-Qaeda in Iraq who had taken refuge in rural areas north of the city. After several counter-insurgency operations, 3-69 AR Battalion effectively removed Al Qaeda in Iraq from the greater Anbar province. By March 2008, Ramadi, Iraq had become a vastly safer city than it had been only a year before and the number of enemy attacks in the city had fallen drastically. Years later, by mid 2012, Ramadi remained far safer than it had been since 2003.[45][46][47]

Iraqi Police Development Played a Key Role in Tribal Engagement Strategy[edit]
One major shortcoming in the efforts to wrest control of Ramadi from the insurgency was the failure of the Iraqi Police to effectively combat the insurgency. As part of the Tribal Engagement Strategy, Ready First developed and implemented a plan to quickly recruit, train, and employ Iraqi Policemen on the streets of Ramadi. COL MacFarland, and LTC James Lechner, Deputy Brigade Commander, successfully developed an Iraqi Police recruiting, training, and employment plan that was implemented by HHC, 2-152 Infantry (Mech), an Army National Guard unit that lived in Iraqi Police Stations and Combat Outposts conducting daily patrols and clearing operations with their counterparts. HHC, 2-152 Infantry, also known in Ramadi as "the 152nd", or the Police Transition Team (PTT) Company would provide the Iraqi Police in Ramadi with the leadership and oversight that proved crucial in re-establishing a police presence in Ramadi to ensure insurgent forces did not return to neighborhoods that had been secured. Consequently, the success of the Iraqi Police program in Ramadi convinced the Ramadi populace that their government could effectively provide for their security needs, a critical element of defeating the insurgency. The 152nd PTT Company's Iraqi Police efforts began in October 2006 and would continue through the departure of Ready First and into the tenure of 1st Brigade, 3rd Infantry Division until the 152nd departed in October 2007. The 152nd was responsible for recruiting, training, and conducting patrols with hundreds of Iraqi Police, and opened several new Iraqi Police stations in the city of Ramadi."

Battle of Ramadi 2006 - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

here's Ramadi today

ct-ramadi-united-states-policy-20150519


Arab_today-_ee110brk1.jpg


isil.jpg
 
Ramadi, the shame of the Bush neo-cons and the Sunni army. The first never planned for the fall of Iraq and the second won't fight for their country. Bring our troops home and send our neo-cons, their supporters and their families to permanent exile in Iraq.
 
Obama's assessment of ISIS was that they were a JV team - Obama was so very wrong.

Obama said he has a strategy to defeat ISIS - from all evidence it is proving to be a failure.

Maybe Obama should trying to pretend that he is the "smartest man in the room".

.
 
Doesn't matter what BHO is or is not. The Sunnis, assholes, will not fight. Our troops should not fight. Send the neo-cons and their supporters and families into permanent exile in Iraq.
 
Ramadi, the shame of the Bush neo-cons and the Sunni army. The first never planned for the fall of Iraq and the second won't fight for their country. Bring our troops home and send our neo-cons, their supporters and their families to permanent exile in Iraq.

Read the fucking OP first, then comment
 
Ramadi, the shame of the Bush neo-cons and the Sunni army. The first never planned for the fall of Iraq and the second won't fight for their country. Bring our troops home and send our neo-cons, their supporters and their families to permanent exile in Iraq.

"By August 2007, Ramadi had gone 80 consecutive days without a single attack on US forces and the 1st BDE, 3rd ID commander commander, Colonel John Charlton, stated, "...al-Qaida is defeated in Al Anbar".
 
Ramadi, the shame of the Bush neo-cons and the Sunni army. The first never planned for the fall of Iraq and the second won't fight for their country. Bring our troops home and send our neo-cons, their supporters and their families to permanent exile in Iraq.

"By August 2007, Ramadi had gone 80 consecutive days without a single attack on US forces and the 1st BDE, 3rd ID commander commander, Colonel John Charlton, stated, "...al-Qaida is defeated in Al Anbar".
80 days? Last I checked, Ramadi has now gone several years without a single attack on US forces.
 
The OP is screwed up, Frank. The US had no plan for the fall of Iraq, and everything has happened because of that. The Sunni army won't fight. Our soldiers can't win the damn war without the Sunni army's willingness to fight. Bring our soldiers home, and send you and yours to permanent exile in Iraq.
 
Obama's assessment of ISIS was that they were a JV team - Obama was so very wrong.

Obama said he has a strategy to defeat ISIS - from all evidence it is proving to be a failure.

Maybe Obama should trying to pretend that he is the "smartest man in the room".

.

From Obama's support of the Arab Spring with the removal of Gaddafi and Mubarek to his "strategy" to deal with ISIS; the evidence is that he has been wrong on every count. White House spin aside it is becoming clear that Obama doesn't have a plan:

"Now events may be forcing a rethink. The Obama administration is taking “an extremely hard look” at its approach, in the words of an unnamed official who declared in the wake of the fall of Ramadi: “You’d have to be delusional not to take something like this and say ‘what went wrong, how do you fix it and how do we correct course to go from here?’”

Robert Gates, the former US defence secretary, put it even more bluntly: “We don’t really have a strategy at all. We’re basically playing this day by day.” The urgent delivery of new anti-tank missiles for the Iraqi army has been one short-term response. But larger military and political questions are still unanswered."

Seizure of Palmyra and Ramadi by Isis reveal gaping holes in US jihadi strategy World news The Guardian

.
 
The question is not if the US strategy to defeat ISIS has failed. The question is if there is a strategy to defeat ISIS.

The three steps the US wants to take to defeat ISIS US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

When the strategy was published by the US government, it said it would need 3 years until ISIS is defeated. Was Saddam Hussein defeated in three years or Gadaffi?
That was enough for me to know. The true strategy the government follows is to control its baby ISIS´ independent existence with a carrot-and-stick policy. Where the US does not want ISIS to attack, it bombs ISIS. Where it wants ISIS to attack, it drops supplies. The Iraqis say that the US bombings at the frontiers with the Iraq government are "not so precise" like the bombings in the Kurdish regions.
 
The answer to all questions is this: we are not going great guns back into Iraq.

Either the Iraqis save themselves or not.
 
Obama's handling of Iraq is like the NYC mayor disbanding the police and declaring the war on crime over after a week with no murders. The US forces fought hard and sacrificed much to win and maintain the peace.

I happen to believe that Obama is not a stupid man and was not clueless about the inevitable outcome of withdrawing the US forces. He switched sides and drew down the force for good in the area, leaving it wide open for evil to take over
 
Frank, I believe for several reasons you are increasingly emotionally unbalanced.

The Iraqis have to fight if they are going to be free of ISIS. We can't do it for them.

And the American people will not permit another large war in our lifetimes.
 
Obama switched sides and threw his support to AW and ISIS. He threw Ramadi wide open for his Jihadist brothers and AQ stepped into the vacuum. With training and logistical support, the Iraqis would have learned to defeat the jihadists. Now its all for naught, all the soldiers and Marines who sacrificed so much to defeat evil were betrayed by their CinC.
 

Forum List

Back
Top