I can elaborate in a morals thread if you want.It is more, a sad lack of a moral of "goodwill toward men", than ill considered public policy which constitutes public use.No, it wasn't. We also haven't solved simple poverty on an at-will basis nor corrected for the deleterious effects of capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment. Is it a coincidence or "collusion and conspiracy".Exactly. The fact that Wal-Mart and McDonald's profit from welfare is no accident.
I don't think it was either. Just unexpected side effects of ill-considered policy.
Huh?
Please do. Were you commenting on the same thing I was? ie the way welfare programs are designed to protect the haves from the have-nots? -->
...The real reason we have social programs is not for poor but for the protection of those with money and property.
Last edited: