Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So you still support the illegal wars of Obama all because he allows you to exploit illegal slave labor..
Hey, do I get an Obama deescount if I buy a couple Mexicans? Find out for me, will ya?
Big government is the scourge of the world nowadays and it is hurting everybody. Most countries are inflicted with the big government greed disease. We are seeing it all over Europe and it is close to bankrupting several countries.
You mean those European countries that embraced austerity as the correct approach to recovery after we (the USA) brought on the almost biggest financial collapse EVER. Yep those countries are struggling. No jobs.
But you do realize that big government is just the tool the ultra wealthy use to protect themselves? Right? You understand the ultra wealthy have never had it so good? And they don't really give a fuck what we think about the "welfare state" that freaks you out. They (wealthy) just use that (welfare) as something to keep you from looking at their situation. And it works. You got a lot of company freaking out about this topic.
To the ultra wealthy, stability is more important than your taxes. And if stability means you and I (and the ultra wealthy) providing the means for really poor people to have a meager subsistence living as opposed to rioting in the streets over no food, then that's the way it's gonna remain. Especially when the ultra wealthy participated in taking all those JOBS out of country. It's their way of showing a conscious.
You shouldn't freak so bad about it. If you've done as good as you say, you can afford it. Stability means a lot to middle class people too.
Besides that, we wasted so much fucking money on war activities it makes being so crazy about welfare a joke.
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
Most government spending benefits everyone indirectly. Universal healthcare means a healthier America with less disease, more productive workers, and less medical bankruptcies. The mother that's able to work because of government childcare needs less public support. The child that stays in school because a drop out prevention program will probably be able to support himself as an adult. TANF keep families together and kids out of the foster care. Welfare programs and food stamps help keep the poor from rising up against the wealthy and middle class. The real reason we have social programs is not for poor but for the protection of those with money and property.Justifying Taxes and then spending that raised revenue is much more fiscally responsible and much more fiscally sincere, than spending the (other) Peoples' tax monies, and financing the rest on the Peoples' dime.
Most government spending benefits everyone indirectly. Universal healthcare means a healthier America with less disease, more productive workers, and less medical bankruptcies. The mother that's able to work because of government childcare needs less public support. The child that stays in school because a drop out prevention program will probably be able to support himself as an adult. TANF keep families together and kids out of the foster care. Welfare programs and food stamps help keep the poor from rising up against the wealthy and middle class. The real reason we have social programs is not for poor but for the protection of those with money and property.Justifying Taxes and then spending that raised revenue is much more fiscally responsible and much more fiscally sincere, than spending the (other) Peoples' tax monies, and financing the rest on the Peoples' dime.
Big government is the scourge of the world nowadays and it is hurting everybody. Most countries are inflicted with the big government greed disease. We are seeing it all over Europe and it is close to bankrupting several countries.
You mean those European countries that embraced austerity as the correct approach to recovery after we (the USA) brought on the almost biggest financial collapse EVER. Yep those countries are struggling. No jobs.
But you do realize that big government is just the tool the ultra wealthy use to protect themselves? Right? You understand the ultra wealthy have never had it so good? And they don't really give a fuck what we think about the "welfare state" that freaks you out. They (wealthy) just use that (welfare) as something to keep you from looking at their situation. And it works. You got a lot of company freaking out about this topic.
To the ultra wealthy, stability is more important than your taxes. And if stability means you and I (and the ultra wealthy) providing the means for really poor people to have a meager subsistence living as opposed to rioting in the streets over no food, then that's the way it's gonna remain. Especially when the ultra wealthy participated in taking all those JOBS out of country. It's their way of showing a conscious.
You shouldn't freak so bad about it. If you've done as good as you say, you can afford it. Stability means a lot to middle class people too.
Besides that, we wasted so much fucking money on war activities it makes being so crazy about welfare a joke.
Do you know how ridiculous your little rant is?
First of all nobody is poorer because somebody else is richer.
Second of all the adage that "the rich get richer and the poor gets poorer" has traditionally been wrong. The rich get richer and the poor gets richer also. That is what it has been for a long time but the fiscal irresponsibility of the government has changed all that. Now the middle class is evaporating because the government cost over 40% of the GNP and that hurts almost all working families. The ultra rich is insulated from it somewhat but when it takes the salary of one of the two working middle class adults in a family nowadays to pay the combined tax bill for the year then no wonder Americans are getting screwed.
The answer to all this is very simple. Shut down all but the minimal necessary functions of the government and return the money to the people that earned it. The economy will boom then. The rich will get even richer but everybody else will also get richer. The welfare queens will have to get off their lazy fat asses but there will be jobs available for them
The only thing you have correct in your little rant is that the present system of big government is fucking the middle class. It is time to change that model, don't you think? The answer sure as hell is not steal more money from the rich. That may buy some temporary cash flow (at the expense of investments) but it will run out quickly. The answer is to get the government off the backs of the people.
By the way this stability you talk of by paying off the welfare queens is a piss poor way to run an economy, don't you think?
Lower taxes on the rich (by cutting capital gains).
Raise taxes on the middle class by moving more of a tax burden to income.
Lower wages for the middle and lower classes in order to cut the cost of production (and incentivize investment).
Make up for the lower wages by expanding credit.
This strategy gave us a wild ride in 80s and 90s until the economy finally blew up.
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Weird how cons want the US to look like a 3rd world nation
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Weird how cons want the US to look like a 3rd world nation
America is for sale to the highest bidder, and had been for some time now. What part of that bothers you eh?Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Weird how cons want the US to look like a 3rd world nation
How about the con artists George Soros whose $3.5 billion political slush fund bought him a trained monkey in the White House?
[
The country has done pretty well under Obama, in spite of the well documented, almost treasonous, republican obstruction given him.
No, it wasn't. We also haven't solved simple poverty on an at-will basis nor corrected for the deleterious effects of capitalism's, natural rate of unemployment. Is it a coincidence or "collusion and conspiracy".Most government spending benefits everyone indirectly. Universal healthcare means a healthier America with less disease, more productive workers, and less medical bankruptcies. The mother that's able to work because of government childcare needs less public support. The child that stays in school because a drop out prevention program will probably be able to support himself as an adult. TANF keep families together and kids out of the foster care. Welfare programs and food stamps help keep the poor from rising up against the wealthy and middle class. The real reason we have social programs is not for poor but for the protection of those with money and property.Justifying Taxes and then spending that raised revenue is much more fiscally responsible and much more fiscally sincere, than spending the (other) Peoples' tax monies, and financing the rest on the Peoples' dime.
Exactly. The fact that Wal-Mart and McDonald's profit from welfare is no accident.
Doesn't matter whether you be for or against. Fact is, it was a huge waste of money that you can't or didn't condemn nearly as strongly as welfare funds. Why's that?
You haven't been listening. I said no money for welfare, subsidies, bailouts or entitlements. Foreign aid certainly falls within the subset of subsidies, doesn't it? I would cutoff all the welfare queens, including the foreign ones. Meanwhile that idiot you voted for continues with foreign "aid" of all kinds, including building Muslim Mosques. How stupid is that? You must have really been confused when you voted for that idiot Obama, huh?
Weird how cons want the US to look like a 3rd world nation
How about the con artists George Soros whose $3.5 billion political slush fund bought him a trained monkey in the White House?