Racist Attacks On Scott

The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.

He was born in 1965, smfh.
He was born June 30, 1930. It's a shame that I know more about black history than you.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.

He was born in 1965, smfh.
He was born June 30, 1930. It's a shame that I know more about black history than you.

Tim Scott was born in 1965.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.

He was born in 1965, smfh.
He was born June 30, 1930. It's a shame that I know more about black history than you.

Tim Scott was born in 1965.
I was referring to Thomas Sowell, sorry.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?

Yes, really.

There is a difference between individual acts of racism and systemic racism. He knows there’s racists in this country as well as anyone. He just doesn’t believe like a lot of other blacks that it is systemic.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
they are two different things
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?

Yes, really.

There is a difference between individual acts of racism and systemic racism. He knows there’s racists in this country as well as anyone. He just doesn’t believe like a lot of other blacks that it is systemic.

He understands what it is, he is coonin to be accepted by the very people who are the catalyst at maintaining this racist state.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
they are two different things

No they are not. Now racism is individual, is that the new republican line. White folks brought racism to this land and then they brought us.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
they are two different things

No they are not. Now racism is individual, is that the new republican line. White folks brought racism to this land and then they brought us.
Is what the new republican line? Racism existed long before people came to America....and it wasn't and still isn't..isolated to white people.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?

Yes, really.

There is a difference between individual acts of racism and systemic racism. He knows there’s racists in this country as well as anyone. He just doesn’t believe like a lot of other blacks that it is systemic.

He understands what it is, he is coonin to be accepted by the very people who are the catalyst at maintaining this racist state.

I don’t know if he’s “coonin’” or not but the fact remains that there is a difference between the two. Ergo, your implication that because he suffered racism means he must admit systemic racism is off the mark.
 
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.
The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda.
Why can't it be that people simply like and agree with the merits of what Scott has to say? What do you have against blacks?

What he says has no merits, he tells us he has been the victim of racism and discrimination and then turns around and says there is no systematic racism. Really?
His experiences with racism were prior to the 1965 civil rights legislation when there was real racism in this country.

He was born in 1965, smfh.
He was born June 30, 1930. It's a shame that I know more about black history than you.

Tim Scott was born in 1965.
Scott is an African American. When prog Socialist superiority shews like Joy Behar speaks down to your race with her views on racism, then it stinks. Like she does. She knows nothing. Black guys are foolish for letting Prog women lead them around. But then again us White guys, we do the same. And the system is slowly self destructing.
 
Sadly this is par for the course in politics use a racial slur or variation of one against a black Republican no big deal do the same thing to a black Democrat and its systemic racism and the end of the world as we know it.

How many Black Republicans are there in Congress? 1 in the Senate and 2 in the House, gotta love that party of inclusion.
Not the issue the issue is the use of racial slurs against Scott if that was any black Democrat having racial slurs slung at them pretty sure you would be one of the first ones on here crying racist. Gotta love how the party of respect and tolerance has little to none for those who don't share their views especially blacks who don't tow that liberal line.

Look up what a Uncle Tom is and then get back with me and tell me that isn't what Scott is doing.
Look up racism and tell us that isn't what you and those like you are pushing at Scott. You and those like you love to talk about ending racism but you really have no interest in that you want to use it to demonize, villify and silence anyone you don't agree with. The only thing the left hates more than being called on there racial bullshit is being called out on it by a black person now I have wasted enough time on you I'm going to watch reruns of Coach on Antenna TV.

The only reason you are up Scott's butt is because he is pushing your right wing, racist agenda. You claimed to love Colin Powell so much, but look at how quick you turned on him. Tim Scott better wake and realize that he is just being used by right wing, racist.

You just sound foolish so much of the time. Is it intentional or natural?

Barkley%20Voting-S.jpg
 
Is what the new republican line? Racism existed long before people came to America....and it wasn't and still isn't..isolated to white people.

Do you honestly believe that it is only white people who are prejudiced? That's just flat-out ignorant.
 
Is what the new republican line? Racism existed long before people came to America....and it wasn't and still isn't..isolated to white people.

Do you honestly believe that it is only white people who are prejudiced? That's just flat-out ignorant.
No....I think you are misunderstanding what I am saying. I am saying the opposite
 

Forum List

Back
Top